🤷🏻‍♂️

electrician, Dad, enjoy fitness

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Abdelrahmen Adnan Abouelela, an 'asylum seeker', who raped a woman in Hyde Park arrived illegally in the UK in April 2023 and claimed asylum.

He was a convicted Islamic terrorist. A bomb-making conviction. It has been reported that the Home Office was aware of that.

Who was immigration minister? Reform's Robert Jenrick.

Who was Home Secretary? Reform's Suella Braverman.

Jenrick and Braverman welcomed him into the country and put him up in a four star Hilton Hotel in London.

The same hotels that Jenrick bragged about opening...

He went on to rape a woman.

The judge said of the rape.

"You were driven purely by your own sexual desires."

"It must have been obvious to you that she was a woman under the influence of alcohol who was alone and vulnerable."

"You made the decision to take advantage of her vulnerability."

"You simply did not care that she could not consent: you just took what you wanted."

Reform need to be honest with the British people about what their MPs have inflicted on women across the country.

What did they know about this man? Why did they allow a convicted Islamic terrorist to claim asylum in Britain? Why did they house him in four star accommodation?

The people deserve answers.

Reform's Jenrick and Braverman must be nowhere near power, ever again.

[🤍𝕁𝕆🤍 @jomickane]

So it turns out the 999 call that was released wasn't the full call. This is the full call which is 12 minutes long, the version that was released had a lot of bits taken out. Now why would they do that 🤔. Notice the emphasis on it being an attack on a brown person and they want immediate action. Also the mention that they were restraining Henry. The call handler also says that an ambulance is on its way due to Henry bleeding from his mouth. I've had to share it in 3 parts as it wont let me share the full length version. Part 1 👇

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I am a member of the Public Accounts Committee in Parliament and we have just released our findings on Britain’s broken asylum system. It is beyond damning.

Some extracts from our report…

“…Government departments still do not have a grip on how they will manage asylum as an end-to-end system, or a clear sense of what they are trying to achieve.”

“Major policy risks and operational changes have been pursued without a realistic grip on delivery risks, costs or system-wide impacts.”

“…no single point of accountability for outcomes or a governance structure for the end-to-end system.”

“…absence of a clear strategy, decisions around planning and resource allocation have been reactive and disjointed.”

“The Home Office was unable to show… that it has the commercial capabilities needed to manage asylum accommodation effectively.”

“…weaknesses in its ability to prevent excess profits accruing for contractors…”

“…no evidence that lessons from past mistakes are being used to clearly inform current actions.”

“Poor data quality and weak management information continue to prevent effective management…”

“…current data sharing limitations make it impossible to directly track individual cases through the entire asylum process.”

“The Home Office does not yet have a credible long-term strategy for asylum accommodation…”

“… there is little evidence the Home Office fully understands the impact of its approach on local services.”

“The government is at considerable risk of repeating past failures.”

But don’t worry, the government says it has a plan...

It says it has “learned a lot of lessons”.

And that it’s going to put 10,000 civil servants into what they call an “Asylum Group”.

Funded by us, of course.

How about improving data-linking systems?

The Ministry of Justice says it simply needs more of our money.

And what about ending the use of hotels and transferring to larger, “purpose-driven” sites?

“The Home Office’s own analysis suggests that large sites will cost more than hotels, as seen in previously costly attempts such as Wethersfield.”

The numbers…

£4.9 billion spent on the system each year, including:
£2.7 billion on asylum accommodation
£700 million on cash support
£600 million on unaccompanied asylum-seeking children
Nearly £1 billion on casework, appeals, detention, and removal

All spent to produce between 50,000 or so refugees each year.

And of course, these costs don’t include what is then paid by us, the taxpayer, in Local Authority housing, welfare, childcare assistance, and advice and translation services once once they receive their refugee status and are no longer in the asylum system.

Want more?

At the time of the NAO report (December 2025), Home Office reported there were roughly 224,000 individuals still waiting in the system, excluding those awaiting an initial asylum decision.

Further, since April 2024, MoJ say the number of asylum seekers waiting for an appeal decision alone has trebled, from 27,000 to 70,000, with appeals taking nearly 60 weeks to be heard.

Who pays for them while they wait over a year for a decision?

Us.

And the tens of thousands of failed asylum seekers each year - what happens to them?

The Home Office isn’t sure.

It says it knows “where some of them are”, but the rest are “elsewhere in the country”, and that it is possible they “remain in the UK without detection”.

Don’t fear though, because the Home Office won’t guarantee that it will find them, only that it would “seek to find them”. Whatever the hell that means…

And to deal with the backlog of cases and appeals?

“Home Office relaxed its recruitment arrangements, resulting in newly recruited staff being ill-suited to making complex decisions on asylum cases, which in turn affected decision quality.”

The result?

“In a rolling twelve months to May 2025, 42% of sampled decisions had significant or fail errors.”

Astounding incompetence.

But there’s more good news...

The MoJ is recruiting even more over-paid salaried and fee-paid judges, as well as recruiting judges from other chambers to sit in asylum cases.

In other words, MoJ’s response is to spend more of our money and remove judges from other work.

This is because more asylum seekers “are now representing themselves and that this requires additional support from tribunal staff.”

“The system of monitoring failed asylum seekers needs a complete overhaul,” says the report.

I have a better idea. My own view?

Scrap the entire system altogether, and deport every single illegal migrant living in Britain.

And to those of you say that it’s impossible - to any MPs, public servants, or commentators who think I’m cherry-picking information, I implore you to read every word of the PAC report, every word of the NAO report, and to watch every minute of the 2.5 hour PAC meeting from earlier this year…

And then tell me that the system is working, and that’s it’s delivering value for money, and that it’s sustainable.

It isn’t. And it never will be.

It is an intentional, monumental catastrophe designed to cripple the nation economically, socially, and culturally.

A Restore Britain government will crush the entire asylum system as its first duty to the British people.

Deport them all.

[🤷🏻‍♂️ @_ODON]

@mariana_hills_m @Chr1st1e love your work! Freedom for all $XPR

[🤷🏻‍♂️ @_ODON]

@ThePosieParker Stop benefits for anyone who hasn’t contributed

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Listen when they tell you. “Everyone in the country will have a digital ID”

Even if you don’t want one! “This isn’t a heavy handed approach but we will make sure everyone has one”

Oh 🤡

[Farmer Luke 🥔 @Ondaintreefarm]

Can I sell my potatoes directly to you guys??I’ve set myself a challenge to do it! The market has still crashed with me still sitting on a shed load of potatoes and their future and mine doesn’t look great. So can I do it??? Well with your guys help, by liking, sharing, commenting and buying I might just do it! Plus you can still buy a bag for us to donate to a local food bank or charity! 🥔👨‍🌾🚜

You can order your posted potatoes or still donate a new bag of potatoes at: https://t.co/SYOW8H9rS9 🥔📮

#FarmerLuke #DownOnDaintreeFarm #Mrsfarmerluke #spudwife

[🤷🏻‍♂️ @_ODON]

@mariana_hills_m @name Very creative, you should do a series of them! WebAuth chr1st1e

[Maggie Oliver @MaggieOliverUK]

RESIGNATION LETTER TO @AndyBurnhamGM

Following my comments yesterday in the media around the huge failures in my opinion of part 4 of @AndyBurnhamGM independent review in Manchester, I am sharing my resignation letter sent to him and his deputy last January 2024, as I have been approached by numerous news outlets for more information. I share it below in full.

I always try to give credit where credit is due, and I will remain eternally grateful to @AndyBurnhamGM for instigating the Independent reviews into Op Augusta in Manchester and Op Span in Rochdale. They both confirmed without doubt that all I had said was true and that has been incredibly important to me and survivors as we tried to make sense of all that happened.

The final part of the process however was meant to be an “ Assurance Review” and it was meant to deliver assurances that CURRENT practises in @gmpolice regarding their treatment of vulnerable victims of sexual abuse were now fit for purpose, based on current evidence. Instead what happened in this 4th part of the review was not honest, transparent, or in any way fit for purpose in my opinion.

It’s a complex subject matter and there’s an awful lot to cover, but this letter below which I sent to @AndyBurnhamGM last January explains some of it, especially why I and @TMOFCharity resigned from a process in stage 4 that was little more than a tick box exercise. Even the two independent professionals who had carried out the previous 3 parts resigned, unwilling to put their names to something they knew was not in fact wanting to speak the truth.

What I saw in Mr Burnham and @gmpolice was a willingness to say there had been huge “failures in the past” but when looking at action around failures still going on today, there truly was no “duty of candour” on display! Instead they turned away. Again.

Once again the voices of those victims and survivors whose voices SHOULD have been front and centre of this report were totally silenced and blocked out of the “Assurance review” making it worthless. The establishment again “marking its own homework”.

Just Like in @IICSAVSCP the 7 year statutory national enquiry for which we are currently taking this government to a Judicial Review, like in Oldham and in so many other cases throughout the country over the last 3 decades.

So there is a willingness to admit past failures as that can no longer be denied, but there’s still a huge avoidance of addressing what’s still going wrong today.

In other words continuing to turn away when what our country (and victims) need is a hard scrutiny at the problems TODAY, based on real life experiences of survivors and not a cover up yet again from those at the top of our PUBLIC institutions whose duty it is to act in my opinion.

Our public servants, must begin to show courage, integrity, honesty, and bravery, something we have not seen in decades. And that’s has to change!!

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

STATEMENT: THE MANCHESTER EVENING NEWS IS ATTEMPTING TO SILENCE ME

The Manchester Evening News has contacted me with a list of allegations it intends to publish. I am making this statement because the public has a right to know what is happening and why.

The allegations are false. Every one of them. They were put to me without a named source, without a single document, and without any indication of who commissioned them or on what evidential basis they were prepared.

The communication was not even signed. A major regional newspaper, demanding a right-of-reply response by Monday 2pm, did not put a name to its own email. That tells you everything you need to know about the confidence this newspaper has in what it is about to publish. That is not journalism by any recognised standard. It is a smear, constructed and delivered under the procedural cover of a right-of-reply request.

The @MENnewsdesk has form. This newspaper has spent the better part of a decade looking away from the institutional failures I have spent the better part of a decade exposing. It did not break the Oldham grooming gang story. It did not demand the national inquiry. It did not stand with survivors when doing so was costly and unpopular. I did. The people of this town did.

Now, at the precise moment Reform UK has destroyed Labour in Oldham and the national inquiry is formally underway, this newspaper has chosen to come for me.

The timing is not accidental.

Andy Burnham is manoeuvring toward a parliamentary return. Labour's grip on Greater Manchester depends on controlling the political narrative. My campaigning, eight years of documented, sourced, legally tested investigative work, is a threat to that narrative. A threat to the project that would see Burnham as Prime Minister. The MEN has historically functioned as a press office for Labour's Greater Manchester operation. What is happening now is the continuation of that function by other means.

I am a decorated anti-racist. I hold an MBE. I have sat in rooms with Prime Ministers and Secretaries of State. I have designed and implemented counter-extremism interventions at the highest levels of government. I have faced down Nazis, white supremacists, Islamists and jihadists. The idea that this man is a racist, peddling hatred for profit, does not survive thirty seconds of contact with my public record. Any journalist who had done the most basic due diligence would know that. The MEN knows that.

They are proceeding anyway.

I have sent the MEN a formal warning letter. I am already conducting active High Court proceedings in the King's Bench Division. I have solicitors engaged. Any publication of these allegations will be treated as an actionable wrong and pursued accordingly.

There is one further matter I am placing on public record.

I am a known figure in a town with a documented history of communal tension. Publishing content that portrays me as a racist because I spoke out against the Pakistani Rape Gangs does not merely damage my reputation. It creates physical risk. If the MEN publishes this piece and I or my child are attacked as a result, the question of editorial recklessness will be answered in court.

I have not been silenced by arrests. I have not been silenced by false charges, by de-platforming, by blacklisting, or by years of coordinated harassment. I will not be silenced by a politically motivated hit piece from a newspaper that spent a decade refusing to report what was happening to the children of my town.

Raja Miah MBE

[Supreme CBD - UK’s #1 CBD OIL @supreme_cbd]

LIKE & RT to WIN Free CBD Oil & Gummies😋

🚨 24000mg CBD Oil + FREE 4800MG Gummies
🔥 ONLY £100

WATCH Ant & Serena explain… 👇

📩 DM “STRONG” here @supreme_cbd to secure yours
⏳ Limited stock
#CBD #supremecbd #deal

[Marshall Hayner @MarshallHayner]

A @metalpaysme credit card integrated with @MetalDollarXMD powered by @LOAN_Protocol running on @XPRNetwork secured by @MetalBlockchain connected to Credit Unions and Banks for seamless access to your money on and off the blockchain.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

How do you know the ‘Climate Crisis’ is a hoax?
Please share and comment

[Kemi Badenoch @KemiBadenoch]

"Wriggle room if the killings did not in fact happen."

Those are the words of Keir Starmer's Attorney General, sent whilst dragging British troops through the courts.

The troops were innocent. Keir Starmer's judgement is not.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

💥This shocking 💥
The Medicines and Healthcare Product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) our health regulator carried out active monitoring of ~ 36000 individuals of which ~ 30000 took the Covid ‘vaccine’. For 4 years they have sat on THEIR OWN DATA which showed that 51% of the vaccinated had an adverse reaction and 1 in 7 or 13% had a severe adverse reaction (which can include death and is considered significant/ life changing ) .
Despite this the MHRA have not pulled the jabs. This information was made public ( quietly ) in Sept 2025.
Let that sink in ! In the MHRA trail 1 in 7 vaccine recipients died or had a life changing injury 💥
My only question is when will the arrests start ? They knew the shots were highly dangerous in 2022.

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

Even if you’re on the left, the right or in the centre… vote and share for huge sample.

SHOULD KEIR STARMER RESIGN❓

[🤷🏻‍♂️ @_ODON]

@mariana_hills_m @solvent_TDBN Chr1st1e

[Mariana Isabel Lomas @mariana_hills_m]

I’m giving away a Metal LOAN NFT to everyone who completes the steps below.

To enter:
- Comment your WebAuth Wallet
- Like this post
- Retweet

⏰ Giveaway ends at 7 PM Eastern Time today — yes, 7️⃣

Don’t miss it 💜 No exceptions 7️⃣ PM

[🤷🏻‍♂️ @_ODON]

@LondonPubMap Give the skybar a go 👍🏻

[House Of The People @HoTPOfficial]

There is no way of knowing how often Parliament votes against what the public actually wants. Until now.

https://t.co/QpJCcn3FBH tracks every bill going through Parliament. You vote. We compare it to how your MP voted. The gap speaks for itself.