NQ PM Session 3rd of October Short.
Back to trading, with the assistance of @eckhardtdreyer, we have been building some indicators that will be available soon. Who still plots manually?
Thanks to @I_Am_The_ICT for making the concepts available to all.
@I_Am_The_ICT Your view makes God dependent on creation to be loving. In classical Christian theology, Godโs attributes are eternal, not tied to the created order. Love is not something He โacquiredโ after creationโit is who He is in Himself.
@I_Am_The_ICT I mean no disrespect, but in saying the Father is the Son (in your Berean Study), you make God out like some schizophrenicโtalking to Himself, sending Himself, loving Himselfโwhen Scripture shows a real FatherโSon relationship.
(continues ๐)
@I_Am_The_ICT In Trinitarian thought this makes sense: Father, Son, and Spirit eternally love one another. So when Scripture says โGod is loveโ (1 Jn 4:8), it speaks of His very essence. If God were a solitary monad, He could not love until He created.
@I_Am_The_ICT That reduces love to an accident, not an eternal perfection. It means God would need creation to be fully Himselfโwhich is not the God of Scripture. The Bible shows eternal love before creation, not a God who only โbecomesโ love afterward.
@I_Am_The_ICT You also claim the Trinity โemergedโ in the 3rd century. False. Modalism arose in the late 2nd/early 3rd centuries through Praxeas, Noetus, and Sabellius. Trinitarian confession is apostolic, grounded in Christโs teaching, echoed early in the church.
@I_Am_The_ICT Proverbs 30:4: โWho has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered the wind in His hands? Who has wrapped the waters in a cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name, and what is His Sonโs name? Surely you know!โ