@JBKSchlossberg Each generation scrutinizes historical political figures. Whatever context JFK would need to allegedly 'punch back' on, consider Nixon's, McCarthy's, or even Napoleon's descendants jumping onto X to say, "Stop it."
@Doctor_I_am_The Shift the context to your lived experience: "Take the vaccine or you'll no longer be a Physicist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Attorney, Biologist, Chemist, and Psychologist—and you can't use your savings or sell your assets either." That's the equivalent of those financially forced.
@ResearcherNP@CaulfieldTim Shaun, sadly you have a genuine concern but won't get a response from the self-proclaimed 'reasonable mind'.
Let's see if the below holds any water from the OP:
"Yes, we need to listen to & respectfully engage those with genuine concerns. Always."
The variants in the plasmid have reproduced themselves for a 3rd time.
We do not see these in the vaccine alone. Only when the vaccine is in contact with OVCAR3 cell lines.
This implies the DNA is active in those cell lines and likely replicating.
@colonelhogans I doubt it's obvious at all who hates Melbourne, given that actual residents will have diverse reasons. Don't let it bother you, tourist.
@CaulfieldTim More like "....to combat anti-establishment voices."
Come on, people. This guy is paid to exclusively push government narratives. PROPAGANDIST.
@CaulfieldTim A BODY of research INCLUDES research and expertise that don't necessarily support your pro-establishment views. You here are talking about a BODY of your PREFERENCES. Be accountable for your own "self-sealing" claims and respond to genomic scientist @Kevin_McKernan's critiques.
@eekymom@NBCNews@CDCgov Not to mention the red flag of saying 'most people' recover. Would a scientist like to point out the critical figure—ie. exactly how many don't recover?? 10%? 49%?
@incognitoone10 @glenpyle My relative got pericarditis after two months. Idiots keep referencing studies with a two-week window or a study group SMALLER than the incidence rate!! Like this stupid CDC one. Then idiots get on their pulpit and say "It's definitive! All else debunked! RAH RAH!"
@glenpyle Pro-vax are frothing over a data-collection exercise. Scientists warn that the 'absence of a signal' in a pivot table cannot clinically falsify the link. Specific autopsy protocols and study design would be required ➡️BEFORE⬅️the death certs. You know, SCIENCE.
CDC data gets you:
@CaulfieldTim@_Jahan GASLIGHTING. You infer this data collection exercise has falsified any link between vaccines and myo deaths. It simply says their data (more likely their methodology) 'didn't support it'. Where is the autopsy research? People BEWARE of what is sold as 'science.'
Lest we forget:
@Doctor_Eric_B This is the 'study' methodology you're defending:
"The study also noted that the small population size made it less likely to see a “rare event such as sudden cardiac death” among the age group."
How dumb do you think people are?
https://t.co/zVPy79r4rC
@Kevin_McKernan@Doctor_Eric_B Another non peer-reviewed pivot table from CDC? No independent autopsy research with protocols designed specifically for detecting vaccinal damage?
Expect this...
@Doctor_Eric_B Cherry-picking one person to represent 'they'?
OMG, dude. Plenty of people are critiquing the 'data analysis'. But I guess isolating those goes against your narrative.
@DrJohnHhess "The study also noted that the small population size made it less likely to see a “rare event such as sudden cardiac death” among the age group."
You call that an extensive study?