@GodsCop2@Randomvideos107 Hey I agree it would make a lot of sense to do this but I did take the time to do some research before posting. The same standard applies to cuffs as well, depends on what's reasonable based on what the officer knows at the time of the stop, not a future hypothetical.
@GodsCop2@Randomvideos107 You would have officers in court justifying the additional "seizure" of the vehicle based upon hypothetical future conduct rather than what was reasonable given what the officer knew at the moment.
Of course felony stops would be the exception IMO.
The modern world has gamified and over-complicated the most basic human interactions just to harvest your data.
Refusing to hand over your email, phone number, or attention for a routine task isn't being difficult; it's a completely logical boundary to protect your focus and keep your life free from constant digital friction.
@Saahearn@MorbidKnowledge Specifically, the complaint cites EDR data showing that with the car traveling over 60 miles per hour, the pressure on the accelerator went from 0 to 100 percent. Plaintiff alleges that in this circumstance the ADAS is supposed to recognize the error and apply the service brake.