Amnesty, B'Tselem and the UN Commission of Inquiry have each concluded in reports that Israel is committing genocide, based on their findings of acts and intent. "Allege" accurately reflects that these are investigative assessments, not binding court judgments. No court has ruled on the merits; the ICJ case remains pending with pleadings into 2029. Some scholarly bodies, including a 2025 IAGS resolution, share the conclusion while others do not.
Home is where my heart is and home is where I'll stay.
It's going to take more than the likes of Hunter Eagleman or the other Con Inc grifters to convince me otherwise.
In the same breath, if we hate fake news so much maybe we should stop giving them air time for our interviews.
Israel has the right to defend itself, just like every country. October 7 was a horrific atrocity, and Hamas, Hezbollah and the IRGC own their violence. I never said otherwise.
But "right to defend yourself" isn't a blank check. Even in war, self-defense has limits: you go after combatants, not civilians, and the harm you cause has to be proportionate to the military goal. That applies to every country, including Israel, the US, and any country you're rooting for.
And "they started it" isn't a moral defense. It's what every side in every war says. Hamas says it about the occupation. Israel says it about October 7. If that settled things, nobody could ever be held accountable for anything.
That's exactly what my post was about. Dionysios started a revolt, and the Ottomans answered by flaying him alive. Both sides were brutal, and "he started it" didn't excuse the second part then either.
My position hasn't moved: no one gets a pass for killing civilians, no matter who fired first. You can back Israel's right to defend itself and still insist it follows the rules. If you think it shouldn't have to, say that.
Your stepson works at the embassy with a top secret clearance and sent Israelis a QR code asking for cash wedding gifts in dollars or shekels. He only said “oops, family only” after Politico called him on it. That’s not a mix up. That’s sloppy as hell for someone in that job. Same guy who helped welcome a convicted U.S. spy into the embassy. Screaming “hit piece” and cheering when Trump boots the press doesn’t fix the email. It just makes it look like Israel comes first yet again.
The bishop led a revolt with a bunch of peasants carrying farm tools, they hit Ioannina, it fell apart fast, and the Ottomans made an example of him. Flayed him, stuffed the skin, marched it around. His guys got burned or worse. Churches got wrecked, people died or got pushed to convert.
But painting every Muslim as a barbarian because of what one empire did in 1611 is lazy. Same way it’s lazy when people only remember the Crusades or the Inquisition and act like that’s the whole story of Christianity. Back then every empire answered rebellion with terror. Christians did it to each other, to Jews, to Muslims. We flayed people too. We burned people. We had our own dark centuries.
The Ottomans weren’t running a 400 year slaughterhouse. They let the Orthodox Church keep running, gave the Patriarch real power over his people, and most of the time people just lived their lives paying the extra tax and staying secondclass. It sucked. It wasn’t constant massacre.
We can honor the guys who died without turning it into “their god is the problem.” That’s not history. Both sides have plenty of blood. I’m not interested in keeping the scoreboard going forever.
When the Turks found the Greek bishop Dionysios the Philosopher in 1611, they flayed him alive, stuffed his skin with straw, and paraded it from city to city. Eventually, this "attraction" reached Constantinople, where it was received with enthusiasm by the muslims.
When it passed below the sultan's seraglio, the sultan, hearing the commotion, rose from his throne and stepped out onto the balcony to see what was happening.
Three days later, the muslim Turks also discovered Deli Giorgos and Lambros. They burned Lambros alive, while they crucified Giorgos and, instead of a crown of thorns on his head, they drilled holes into which they placed feathers. Dionysios’s skin, together with the heads of 85 Greek Christian rebels, was sent to Constantinople, where it was thrown into the Sultan’s stables.
Afterwards, Osman Pasha carried out reprisals against the population of Thesprotia, while a climate of terror spread to Ioannina and throughout Epirus.
Many churches and monasteries were destroyed, such as that of Saint Demetrios at Dichouni, and their properties were confiscated. Many inhabitants of these areas were killed, enslaved, or forced to convert to Islam, while most of the survivors scattered into the mountains.
From the fall of Constantinople in 1453 until 1822, the Greeks suffered systematically unimaginable tortures and slaughters for their faith. It was barbarism that the human mind cannot imagine or comprehend. These are dark pages of history that the world does not know.
But you have learn and search about what the barbarians did in the name of their god.
- Homer Pavlos
It’s not telling the entire story accurately…
Dionysios wasn’t some random innocent priest. He already tried a revolt in 1600, went to Spain asking for backup, came back, gathered hundreds of peasants with farm tools, hit two Ottoman villages first, then stormed Ioannina and burned the pasha’s house. Ottomans smashed it the next day. They flayed him alive, stuffed the skin with straw and sent it to Constantinople to scare everyone else. He started the fight. They made sure nobody wanted to copy him.
1.Seoul is a bad comparison. Seoul is about 35 miles from the border and in range of thousands of cheap artillery guns that are hard to knock out quickly. Iran has missiles and drones, which are expensive, limited in number, and often get shot down. And it didn't stop anyone. Israel hit Iran in 2024, and the US hit Fordow and Natanz in 2025. Some hostage.
2.The North Korea history doesn't back him up. Clinton did back off in 1994, but then the two sides made a deal that froze Yongbyon for about eight years. North Korea got the bomb after that deal fell apart, not because the US got scared off.
3.What Iran is doing now doesn't prove what it planned before. Countries lash out when they get attacked. You can't point at what happens during a war and say it proves the plan all along.
https://t.co/CKbnxPk9WZ and London is a stretch. Iran's missiles reach roughly 2,000 km, and Paris is over 4,000 km away. That would take a totally different kind of missile.
5."Death cult" is just a insult. This regime has kept itself alive at every turn. It accepted the ceasefire with Iraq in 1988, signed the 2015 nuclear deal, and kept its 2024 response to Israel measured. US intelligence said for years that Iran hadn't decided to build a bomb.
6.He admits he's working backwards. "Iran can never have a nuke" is a goal, not proof that this war gets us there. Bombing can push a country to rush for a bomb, kick out inspectors, or quit the nuclear treaty. He never deals with that.
7."Every European leader secretly agrees" can't be checked. Europe also triggered UN sanctions on Iran in 2025, which doesn't look like cowardice. And blaming Muslim populations is a smear, not an argument.
8.Being against this war doesn't mean wanting Iran to have a bomb. There's inspections, sanctions, negotiations, and narrower strikes. Calling people traitors and useful idiots is what you do when you'd rather not argue the point