So Done With This.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech...

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

There are circumstances that raise questions, and the appropriate response to questions is verification, not assumption.

[Kaylan_TX @Kaylan_TX_]

The internet remains undefeated💀

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

The military is not a monarchy, and the president is not above criticism. Service members swear an oath to the Constitution, not personal allegiance to whoever holds the office. The relevant question is not "did she say something people dislike?" The question is "what specific UCMJ article or regulation did she violate?"

A uniform does not magically turn a person's private political opinion into an official Air Force statement. Unless she claimed to speak for the service, engaged in prohibited political activity, violated a lawful order, or her conduct met an actual military legal standard, "I don't like what she said" is not the same thing as a court-martial offense.

[God @TheTweetOfGod]

Nope.

[𝙹𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝙱𝚕𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚂𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚛𝚝 @jastuart68]

Watching ICE agents literally run away from a Mount Laurel Starbucks without their coffee because the neighborhood completely rejected them is pure gold. South Jersey will make you unwelcome every single time you show your faces. #DemsUnited

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

This guy had no right to force someone else to stand or sit. Personal beliefs do not give anyone the authority to put their hands on another person. A strike to the head is not a harmless gesture, especially when you consider that people can have underlying conditions, including traumatic brain injuries, where a blow could have devastating consequences. At minimum, this should be treated seriously as an act of violence. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@RatedR4Robynne

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@prmade313raised The national anthem does not come with a "right to assault people" clause. You can disagree with someone's choice to stand or sit, but the moment you put your hands on them, you are the one breaking the law. A head strike is not a lesson, it's violence.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@mtgreenee You are either blind or complicit, which is it?

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

Happy Birthday! Life's Greatest Fortune is your family by your side.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@atrupar Plenty of water for the servers. Not so much for the kids.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@allenanalysis I'm starting to wonder what other permits exist. Is there a license to hand someone a napkin? Meanwhile, somewhere there's a guy who's been selling soft serve under the table like it's contraband.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

Unlicensed Roofers on Meth, EASY.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@Randaroo1212 Someone should've checked behind Niagara Falls for the shutoff valve years ago.

[Senator Adam Schiff @SenAdamSchiff]

Todd Blanche doesn’t know who wrote the document giving the Trump family immunity to cheat on their taxes.

And yet... he signed it.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@IvankaTrump @TiffanyATrump @FIFAWorldCup Did you know that children go hungry in Florida waiting for food assistance (a couple hundred in SNAP) up to 30 days in Florida? Have fun!

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@KariLake The important question is not whether a court temporarily allowed the case to move forward; it’s whether the President has the legal authority to condition USPS ballot delivery on states handing over voter registration data. That question has not been finally answered.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

This headline is more definitive than the courts have been.

A stay pending appeal is a temporary procedural ruling. It is not a final decision that the executive order or the proposed USPS rule is lawful. The legality of the proposal is still being litigated, and at least one federal judge has already ruled that major portions of the order likely exceed presidential authority because election administration is largely governed by the states and Congress, not the President.

In other words, this isn't "game over." It's an ongoing court case.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

420 representatives both Democrat and Republicans would rather give a King 2 Billion than to ensure no child is hungry.

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

@HouseGOP Delivering to King Abdullah II of Jordan it appears.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

The Postal Service….an institution meant to serve EVERYONE—is now being weaponized to influence elections.

[Occupy Democrats @OccupyDemocrats]

BREAKING: In a stunning and deeply alarming move, the Postmaster General has announced that the USPS will REFUSE to deliver mail-in ballots for the 2026 midterm elections to any state that does not comply with Donald Trump’s so-called “election integrity” executive order.

Let that sink in.

This is a direct attack on voting rights and a blatant attempt to strong-arm states into submission by threatening Americans’ access to the ballot box.

The Postal Service….an institution meant to serve EVERYONE—is now being weaponized to influence elections.
Democracy is not optional. Voting is not conditional. And no president gets to decide who can and cannot participate in our elections.

This should outrage every American, regardless of party.

[So Done With This. @_X_garbage]

@catturd2 You're dumb as a wet cardboard box full of rocks:
https://t.co/Is0S5Jqvwh

[Grok @grok]

No. The EAVS duplicate registration figure tracks routine processing of forms matching existing records during list maintenance under federal law—not fraudulent votes cast or counted.

Arizona courts examined all major claims of irregularities and rejected them, finding no evidence that would have changed the certified 17,117-vote margin. The data does not support fraud as the reason for the outcome.