@a_betting@simmo_melb89 @suckmeoffdumdog your political and social awareness. I say this because what willing to act upon here is a direct contradiction to the main driving force behind organisation of large groups of people of which active support survives and thrives on.
@a_betting@simmo_melb89 @suckmeoffdumdog If you are a general supporter and are pro-authority then I may not agree with your stance or belief, but at least you're not contradicting yourself. If you an active supporter and are pro-authority to a point where you are willing to assist authority, then you may need question
@suckmeoffdumdog @stevesmithffx You're making this comment when Carlton are barely a top 8 side, what will you (and me as well tbf) be like when Carlton are actually good?
@patchohoulio @princerubiton Not a brain fart, a directive from Bev that every dogs player adheres to, and clearly the AFL are having none of it. The sooner Bev gives up on this idea he's found a loopholes the better for his team.
@eldantehicks @simmo_melb89 @w_m_jay @suckmeoffdumdog As someone who was deeply involved in the old NT, I always believed in the idea of an apolitical stance as a matter of including people of all political persuasions into the NT. This does not mean you can just say "we're apolitcal" when a situation by it's very nature becomes so
@eldantehicks @simmo_melb89 @w_m_jay @suckmeoffdumdog The apolitcal stance also becomes null and void when a member of your group uses the f-word that is commonly used as a derogatory statement towards gay people. From that point forward, the very nature of the issue is political, there is no getting past that.