@tariqnasheed He was there to murder a white boy, and he did just that. You little story about systemic racism is old and tired. Go back to posting about Jim Crow 2.99. This kid is going to prison.
@CorbinCasteel Funny that UT is so great (blah blah), yet they have a proven history of stealing players and coaches from TTU. You even mention one as if it's some kind of flex. Insufferable cunt.
But you're over here coping, so...
They Are Already Howling. And Every Scream Exposes the Rot.
The jury has been seated in the Karmelo Anthony murder trial. No African Americans sit among them.
The usual racial grievance apparatus is already in full seizure…demanding to know how “justice” can possibly be served when the defendant’s skin is not numerically represented in the box.
They are not asking a question.
They are issuing a threat dressed as principle: that any verdict rendered by a jury lacking the correct demographic quota must be presumed illegitimate before the first witness opens their mouth.
This is not a defense of Karmelo Anthony.
This is not even primarily about the facts of the stabbing under that Frisco tent. This is about the deeper, more lethal pathology on display every time a certain cohort encounters a legal process that refuses to treat race as the sole relevant variable in human judgment.
The demand itself…that a Black defendant possesses a constitutional right to Black jurors…is not a cry for fairness.
It is an explicit assertion of racial essentialism. It assumes, with the casual arrogance of the ideologically captured, that human beings are nothing more than avatars of their melanin, that only those who share your skin can possibly render an impartial verdict on your actions, and that any deviation from this racial arithmetic constitutes proof of systemic conspiracy.
It is the same poisonous logic once used to justify all-white juries in the Jim Crow South…only inverted, rebranded as “equity,” and weaponized by people who have never bothered to read the Sixth Amendment, Batson v. Kentucky, or the centuries of common-law evolution that deliberately rejected race-based jury composition as incompatible with individual justice.
They want a constituency on the jury, not impartial finders of fact.
They want engineered outcomes, not evidence-driven deliberation.
And when the process declines to deliver their preferred demographic result, they declare the entire machinery corrupt rather than confront the possibility that twelve citizens…whatever their races…might actually weigh the evidence without being permanently hijacked by limbic tribal heuristics.
This reaction is not random political noise. It is the predictable output of a specific cognitive and cultural pathology: identity politics as neurological training.
It rewires the brain to interpret every institutional outcome through a racial lens, to treat statistical under-representation as automatic evidence of malice, and to replace the difficult adult work of evaluating facts with the emotionally gratifying work of maintaining permanent grievance posture.
Forensic psychology has mapped this terrain for decades. Pretrial publicity, confirmation bias, and motivated reasoning can distort perception.
The proper response is rigorous voir dire, cause challenges, Batson scrutiny, and judicial instructions…not racial quotas in the jury box
They want guaranteed loyalty. They want jury nullification by skin color. And they are furious that the Constitution was written by men who had already seen what happens when justice is subordinated to tribal score-keeping.
The piece that follows is not a defense of any particular verdict. It is a dissection…legal, historical, psychological, and unsparing…of why the demand for racially calibrated juries is not merely illiterate but actively corrosive to the only form of justice a free society can sustain.
It explains how American juries are actually forged, why sequestration is a discretionary tool rather than a constitutional mandate, why Batson prohibits racial strikes without requiring racial outcomes, and why the current outrage reveals far more about the complainants than it does about Collin County or the Sixth Amendment.
Read it if you still believe that justice is supposed to be blind rather than color-coded.
https://t.co/2kJkM4v3RM
@SeniorChief79@SarahisCensored Texas isn't a Stab your ground state, especially with premeditated actions, so looks like getting you shit pushed in or tossing salads for the rest of his life may be a fate worse that death. Darkness indeed.
12 Crackas? Only fair if the skin color matches, racist.