abiodun

Perpetually Horny | Anti-intellectual | Dumbo | Nobody's Favorite | Allegiance to the best argument and whoever propounds it.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

> Even if intellectual speculation has, at times, led to bizarre doctrines and monstrous conclusions, we cannot but have a certain sympathy for, and interest in, the struggle of the human intellect to attain the Truth.

∮ Father Frederick Copleston.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@maskmanoyebamy @Illusionist_126 Oh yeah, yuval trades in trifles and facile history, and jejune understanding of technology he advocates.

But his story telling narrative is up there.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@maskmanoyebamy @Illusionist_126 Take everything with a grain of salt. It’s slop infested.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@Danhameeda Doing* alright.

[Gabo @Tega_Gabriel]

Loool I will bet that most people feel this way about underscore underscore underscore underscore Abiodun underscore underscore underscore underscore. And for good reason I should add. There is something unbearable about him, something that provokes in his interlocutors a kind…

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@Danhameeda Lmaooo! I’m going alright oo, well, Elon is doing what he’s doing. But we deh for here.

Thank you for checking up on me.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom Ah, see. I told you I was on the spectrum. And it’s hard to infer from written text.

Anyways, I need to read. Till we meet again. 🤝

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

LMAO!

At least, in your lurid way, beneath the feeble disguise of a weak intellect, your mind can still apprehend the presence of creative artistry when its is unmistakable. By being “blown” is an involuntary panegyrics, in defence of a renowned halfwit.

Regardless, thank you!

[The Stool Of Wisdom𓃵 @dStoolofWisdom]

We had an argument a month ago, when he attacked @_OKJ__ for saying that evolution is not random. He was right to say that randomness is part of evolution, but the way he attacked Kevin's intelligence was mind blowing.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom I was merely offering an avenue for fruitful discussion between you and I, if you do not want that. It’s fine.

But don’t ever get it twisted that you can police me. But I guess, like all things, time will tell.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom You fancy yourself my police. Such chutzpah.

Please allow me to laugh. 😂😂🤣😭

No context of the conversation, yet you feel you have the wherewithal to adjudicate.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom And if that’s the case, you’d get whatever it is that’s coming for you. I operate from position of strength, not weakness.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom No. Lmao! You can’t be my police. Nor do I think you have the acuity to understand the depth of my rebuttal, nor is it your business how I respond to what I deem as bad faith interlocutors. Do not pollute my rhetorical space.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom Indeed. I should have put it in quotation marks. 👌

To put it precisely, this means a tacit assumption of civility and good faith is agreed prior to any discussion or quotes? And no subbing like you did, yesterday that serves as the impetus for this unfortunate thread?

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom So an armistice then, or do you want to continue in the vein of Kelvin’s and Jaydon’s primordial beef?

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom I can’t assume that, it’s there, in the context.

I mean it when I said another time. In a different context, perhaps then you can pattern match it to this one.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom Hopefully, we engage again under a better pretext, I’d try my best to explain.

It’s a matter of language, as the “house of being” the ambiguities & how it tacitly affects our intents and locus, not in the analytical bent as you’re using it. Perhaps even a Heideggerian meditation

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom I like your tone.

Read the conversation up to the last tweet.

I made it clear I’m not going to explain it to you, except it’s under a different context, when the opprobrious vestiges of this conversation is no longer in effect.

Would you not want that too?

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom Sure.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom My screenshot said you did. Deny all you want. If that makes you feel better. That’s fine.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom That is not what I said. Read again.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom Indeed. Whatever it is and how quantify worse is definitely within your prerogative. I can’t convince you otherwise, nor do I agree with your judgement.

As such, this line of reasoning, this dialectical goal, is pointless, no?

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom Perhaps, in a different context, not in this one.

A context devoid of the opprobriousness that has afflicted this conversation.

Don’t worry, I know I’m abrasive on first couple of interactions, you might get to warm up to me, or not. That’s fine too.

[abiodun @____abiodun____]

@dStoolofWisdom I don’t know. I went to your profile from your response to Tega in the thread and discovered I was blocked.

I took the screenshot to round up the unfortunate thread. I do not care for your reasons for what you do or do not, just the evidence that you did.