El exceso de prudencia ahoga porque es también exceso de estructura y le da mucho lugar al pensamiento intrusivo. Gran parte de la emoción habita en la adrenalina. Como cuando María Lezo escribe: caminando siempre por la orilla uno no se ahoga, pero nunca nada. Nada. Nunca.
Nivel superior: vienen del secundario sin saber interpretar un texto
Secundaria: llegan de primaria c problemas de lectoescritura
Primaria: llegan del jardín sin saber expresarse
Jardín: vienen de casa sin saber hablar
Casa: mí bebé es superdotado mira como pone solito youtube
😵
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
Ezra Klein, con quien tengo muchos desacuerdos pero siempre escucho, escribió esto que me parece acertado sobre el asesinato de Charlie Kirk:
“You can dislike much of what Kirk believed and the following statement is still true: Kirk was practicing politics in exactly the right way. He was showing up to campuses and talking with anyone who would talk to him. He was one of the era’s most effective practitioners of persuasion. When the left thought its hold on the hearts and minds of college students was nearly absolute, Kirk showed up again and again to break it. Slowly, then all at once, he did. College-age voters shifted sharply right in the 2024 election.
“That was not all Kirk’s doing, but he was central in laying the groundwork for it. I did not know Kirk and I am not the right person to eulogize him. But I envied what he built. A taste for disagreement is a virtue in a democracy. Liberalism could use more of his moxie and fearlessness. In the inaugural episode of his podcast, Gov. Gavin Newsom of California hosted Kirk, admitting that his son was a huge fan. What a testament to Kirk’s project.”
“Kirk and I were on different sides of most political arguments. We were on the same side on the continued possibility of American politics. It is supposed to be an argument, not a war; it is supposed to be won with words, not ended through bullets. I wanted Kirk to be safe for his sake, but I also wanted him to be safe for mine, and for the sake of our larger shared project. The same is true for Shapiro, for Hoffman, for Hortman, for Thompson, for Trump, for Pelosi, for Whitmer. We are all safe, or none of us are.”
No siento antipatía por los palestinos, víctimas de quienes les caciquean al dictado de Irán.
Pero cuando veo a un occidental ondeando su bandera, sé que estoy ante un sectario y/o un imbécil.
Es como una baliza.