@VoteLewko And that's not to disparage Pauline. Of course the culture itself has moved so far, so fast. She's relatively wonderful, a beacon of hope and courage as she endeavours to lead the country rightward… in the vicinity of @RupertLowe10.
@VoteLewko Pauline is way left of Menzies. She's probably left of the centre from 1990. Indeed Trump is probably to the left of Bill Clinton on some measures. pitiful that these people are so easily misled.
A Government that's more concerned about Elon Musk than murderous third world migrants attempting to behead us in the street.
The Labour Party is a disgrace.
PS2 We, of course, admire the tremendous enthusiasm and courage shown by these young activists. And for the sake of our cherished democracy, I hope they miraculously prevail. Yet since they aren't praying people, rather they worship an apostate who came to hate Christianity, I stand confidently by my prediction above.
This (woke stuff below) reminds me: there's a big legal challenge to be heard by the High Court in September.
Here's my quick big picture, amateurish, vibes based, largely ignorant, non-legal prediction (which, as usual, will very likely turn out to be correct): annihilation for the NSN/WAP.
Main points (in no particular order): If the West has one unifying moral belief, it is that Hitler and the Nazis are the absolute worst thing ever (which is why, among other reasons, sensible people studiously avoid utilising Adolf as a political mascot. Failure to recognise this is a "red flag" in itself for idiocy, mental illness, or off-the-charts arrogance, but I digress). I'll digress further by asking that when the NS LARPers get annihilated in September, they... go away, for good, and not try to worm themselves into One Nation, for instance, causing more problems with their cursed ideology.
(There is one Jewish Justice on the bench, by the way, one out of seven. A very talented and deserving perosn; I'm certainly not casting aspersions. I'm just speculating/empathising that they may not be especially charitable to neo-Nazis, and we can perhaps infer that there will be some peer and persuasive pressure felt by the other justices.)
The ASIO recommendation is obviously a significant factor, a factor that wasn't present in the Menzies Communist Party case from the 1950s, which is often cited by the NSN as a "precedent".
As I understand it, this case isn't only about "free speech" or "political communication". The Justices will also be considering "social cohesion", and the LARPers are totally doomed on that front given my first point above and the "diverse" nature of our "modern society".
The Justices will also be pointing out that their judgement doesn't ban an ideology or prevent people from holding certain views; it relates specifically to one organisation, an organisation with dozens of spicy and "hateful" statements, including, to the best of my memory, "YES! WE ARE MILITANT!!"
Need I go on...
Um... yeah. I think the Justices will side with the government of the day, ASIO, and society at large.
Case closed. Hitler dead, buried, cremated, and cremated again for a final time. It's over!
P.S. I hope right-wingers aren't "blackpilled" by all this. Sewell the midwit Odinist is not required. Trillionaire Elon Musk's move to the "far right" is but one of several extraordianry indicators I could call upon. The genie is out of the bottle. We are winning.
@LonePatriot14
(@JohnRuddick2@dr_sgm600@RestoreAussies@aus_pill@ChavuraStephen@Whats_Newsss@PaulineHansonOz@SwampedAussie@RealMarkLatham@DrewPavlou)
Non-Australians, PLEASE READ THIS: This genuinely could be the worst ever woke/progressive legal decision in the history of the entire Western world.
The High Court of Australia just ruled that the Australian government may be forced to pay tens of millions of dollars to foreign CONVICTED rapists, pedophiles and murderers.
How on Earth did this happen?
The High Court of Australia ruled that foreign non-citizens convicted of crimes like rape, murder and pedophilia in Australia can sue the Australian government for millions of dollars in compensation for subjecting them to ''false imprisonment'' in immigration detention.
The lead plaintiff in this particular case was Safwat Abdel-Hady, a Gaza-born businesman with an Austrian passport initially convicted for spiking drinks with intent to commit an act of indecency, which, on retrial, become a conviction on a lesser charge - he pleaded guilty to using poison to endanger life or inflict grievous bodily harm.
Mr Abdel-Hady mixed a woman a strong cocktail containing the sleeping pill Stilnox. The woman told courts she awoke to find Mr Abdel-Hady assaulting her as her partner slept in another room. After leaving his home her and her partner went to hospital and blood tests showed the couple had traces of Stilnox, cocaine and very high readings of alcohol.
Former Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke attended Abdel-Hady's appeal and wrote a character reference saying he had often entertained him at his home. They were reportedly long standing friends and business partners.
He was subsequently convicted of multiple assaults and subjected to an apprehended violence order.
Courts found that he could not be deported to Austria following the legal decision because his blood clotting condition rendered him medically unfit to travel by any commercial aeroplane, meaning there was no reasonable prospect of his removal.
The High Court of Australia has now ruled that Safwat Abdel-Hady can sue the Australian government for false imprisonment for keeping him in immigration detention awaiting deportation, a decision which opens the door to tens of millions of dollars in compensation claims arising from the ''NZYQ Cohort'' of convicted criminals who were in turn kept in immigration detention while awaiting deportation.
The High Court of Australia ruled in the ''NZYQ Case'' that foreign non-citizens convicted of crimes like rape, murder and pedophilia could not be held in indefinite immigration detention while awaiting deportation because the indefinite detention violated the Australian Constitution in the sense that it was ''punitive'' and ''beyond legislative power.''
As non-citizens, they were slated for deportation at the end of their prison terms but could not be deported due to a mixture of fake asylum claims, medical conditions which apparently precluded deportation, the prospect they could face the death penalty in their home countries, and so on. So the Australian government kept them in indefinite immigration detention for community safety.
The High Court of Australia ruled in NZYQ v Minister for Immigration that these people could not be held in immigration detention where there’s no real prospect of deportation due to fake asylum claims, medical conditions which apparently preclude deportation, the prospect they could face the death penalty in their home countries, and so on. So they were all released.
Here’s a breakdown of their convictions prior to their release onto the streets of Australia:
- Murder or attempted murder: 7 -
Sexual offending (incl. child sex offences): 37
- Assault/violent offending, kidnapping, armed robbery: 72
- Domestic violence & stalking: 16
- Serious drug offending: 13
Within weeks of the release, multiple members of the NZYQ cohort reoffended with new rape offences.
In all, 104 of the 300 released men ultimately reoffended - 21 breaching visa conditions plus committing an offence, 83 charged with state or territory criminal offences, including the alleged bashing and robbery of 73-year-old cancer ridden Perth grandmother Ninette Simons.
One former detainee, a Sudanese born man named Masi Ayiik, was shot by Victorian police after allegedly running at them with a metal pole in Melbourne's southeast. He was in the community on five counts of bail and had allegedly breached visa conditions twice, having originally faced deportation for serious criminal offences.
The Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) and major corporate law firm Allens did pro bono legal work to free these foreign child sex offenders, rapists and murderers and put them back on our streets to committ new heinous criminal offences. What noble work. What a beautiful use of their limited valuable time.
A High Court judgment summary ultimately confirmed that the lead plaintiff in the NZYQ case (a stateless Rohingya refugee) had a child sexual offence conviction; the court held his ongoing detention was unconstitutional because removal wasn’t reasonably foreseeable given the prospect that he would be persecuted as a Rohingya in Myanmar. That ruling prompted the wider releases.
Other cases involved rape, sexual assault of a 12-year-old, assault of an eight-month-old, drug smuggling.
Now the High Court has ruled that the NZYQ cohort rapists, pedophiles and murderers who were kept in immigration detention while awaiting deportation can sue the Australian government for false imprisonment, potentially leading to claims running into the tens of millions of dollars.
So the timeline here is the following:
1. Rohingya refugee convicted of child sex crimes argues that he cannot be deported to Myanmar because he faces persecution.
2. Australian government decide to keep him in indefinite immigration detention due to fears for community safety.
3. Progressive law firms champion the cause of this convicted foreign pedophile and argue for his release.
4. High Court rules that he must be released from indefinite immigration detention alongside hundreds of other hardened violent foreign criminals.
5. 300 violent foreign criminals are released, almost 100 of them immediately reoffend with violent crimes such as rape and the bashing of a 73 year old grandmother with cancer.
6. Seperately, a Gaza born foreigner is convicted of using poison to endanger life or inflict grievous bodily harm. A woman testifies that she woke up to him attempting to rape her after being drugged.
7. Former Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke attends his appeal and writes a character reference for him.
8. Courts rule he cannot be deported due to blood clots preventing him using commercial planes. Government keeps him in immigration detention for community safety.
9. He sues for false imprisonment, opening the door to hundreds of hardened foreign violent rapists, pedophiles and murderers suing the Australian governmrent for false imprisonment.
10. The Australian government now must use our taxpayer money to pay tens of millions of dollars to foreign convicted rapists, pedophiles and murderers.
It's just incredible. You could not make this up.
Also, in researching this post I discovered a case where a Vietnamese drug trafficker (DBD24 in High Court files) who was released from immigration detention on a protection visa because he argued that he faced the death penalty in Vietnam for trafficking. Lol. Lmao. We are literally the dumping ground of the world.
@RedPilledRealst@Aarvoll_ And for Whites, I suspect the threat of being caught and punished plays a larger role than any historical alteration of the gene pool.
For people with lower IQs and poorer impulse control... evidently not so much.
@Aarvoll_
@celina101010@CriticalSouthAU “I'm an individual” – said by someone whose day-to-day existence is entirely dependent on a White male collective that keeps the country functioning