Bhati-an would be a plural for Bhati not for Bhat, for Bhat it would be Bhatan. Just like for Rajput it is Rajputan, for Jats it is Jatan. Also there are no three sources that call Jaipal a Brahmin. Only ferishta calls them Brahmin. Also stop using Google & ChatGPT
Social media pr velle baithe h max to max, hr koi gyanpelu hai like kon kya pehan raha kya khaa raha kon naach raha kon joke pass kar raha sb pe gyan pelna hai 🆒 dikhne k liye
Kuchh chije outrage deserve karti hain but ab unnecessary topic pr unnecessary outrage hota rehta h
Stop using Gemini AI against someone who understands Persian better than you. Muhammad Baqīr was a local who also remarked like Elliot that Jaipal is nowhere mentioned as Brahman by Al-Biruni! Rather Brahmin Kings ruled after Laghaturman. Jaipal wasn't written specifically a Brom