Another way to know weak arguments is when folks continue shifting their point without acknowledging it.
And empirically, the point they eventually anchor on is the most polarizing one because the goal isn’t to make a good argument, it’s to get attention.
My takeaway is that many people don’t actually know how to articulate themselves. I see words being used that mean a certain thing, but the conclusion the poster arrives at with the words makes no sense.
A lot of the arguments have poor premises. And people are generalizing to broad negative statements when they mean a specific thing.
We should do better please.
My takeaway is that many people don’t actually know how to articulate themselves. I see words being used that mean a certain thing, but the conclusion the poster arrives at with the words makes no sense.
A lot of the arguments have poor premises. And people are generalizing to broad negative statements when they mean a specific thing.
We should do better please.
My takeaway is that many people don’t actually know how to articulate themselves. I see words being used that mean a certain thing, but the conclusion the poster arrives at with the words makes no sense.
A lot of the arguments have poor premises. And people are generalizing to broad negative statements when they mean a specific thing.
We should do better please.
This tweet argues the following:
1. Nigerian employers don’t contribute anything to the talent ecosystem except complaints.
2. Because of 1, Nigerian employers are bottom barrel.
3. Because of 2, drag the Moniepoint CEO.
4. 3 assumes the Moniepoint CEO is bottom barrel because premise 1 is assumed to apply to him/his company.
But 4 is _evidently_ false because they employ thousands of people and they have at least 2 programs targeted at building budding talent.
I need them to drag that moniepoint CEO well because naija employers are bottom barrel, they don't contribute anything to the talent ecosystem except complaints.
@Risevest's in-app support system and USD deposit flow could be better. Sometimes I have a good experience, sometimes I have a really frustrating experience.
Personal hack & (I believe the most efficient) to upping your confidence is to simply do hard things. No number of self help books can replace that ..
Consistency mehn
Most people don't have the discipline and this is what separates people walahi. Go and check the greatest in your field
Jefferson the Founding father and the 3rd president of america , in his letter to John Adams, identified a natural aristocracy among men, founded on virtue and talents distinct from the artificial aristocracy of wealth and privilege.
I would say discipline, whether positive or negative, is the true separator. Highly Successful people are consistent. And to Jefferson's point, you cannot cultivate any virtue or talent without discipline.