@FiadhBaikal As Asmongold once said, normal people watch him and Hasan. Different beliefs are fine. That’s the point. Strawb, Rev, and Powdur don’t have to agree. Politics gets better when you listen to facts, not the cult of one side.
The right is splintered at the base. Outside a few big creators, everyone’s squabbling over small differences, manufacturing drama, and fighting over things that don’t matter. It’s louder now because people are unhappy with the administration. A report said the right is more open to ideas than the left. I’m not sure that’s still true. It feels like the right is picking up the same toxicity as the left.
Christianity is becoming more popular again not mainly in packed pews, but in Bible sales, apps, and raw curiosity. People are looking at Scripture on their own.
That makes sense if you watch what politics tried to do. As church influence faded, parts of the left treated the party and the state like a substitute: rely on us, we will provide, we will take from the people you call the enemy, trust the program and do not look too hard at the results. Public money, corporate grocery power, and rules that squeeze small business get sold as care, then excused because “they’re all corporations anyway.” The habit underneath is the same as bad religion: blind faith, a designated enemy, and a mob that punishes anyone who thinks out loud.
People still want somewhere to put their faith. A party is a human machine. It loses, it spins, it demands loyalty. God is a safer object for that trust than a political cult. So the interest in Christianity is not mysterious. It is people looking for meaning that does not collapse every election night.
“Some” doesn’t save it. Haliva ran intel, then he left, then he said the line on a leaked tape. He wasn’t assigning shots when he said it. Fogel and Lieberman are 2018. Different job, different war. A former officer talking is not the aim in a specific shooting. Quotes plus a bystander still isn’t fact. You posted it as one. Don’t worry I’ll pray for you.
Intent can be inferred, but the inference still needs a factual foundation. The COI never produces a verified case of an IDF soldier identifying a civilian child and deliberately killing them for no military purpose. “Pattern and precision” is not a substitute for that when the combat context (Hamas embedding, child fighters, dual use sites) is erased. UN Watch didn’t just disagree it showed the evidentiary gaps. That’s the actual dispute.
Most of that list doesn’t command troops. Haliva said the worst military line after he was already out of intel. Ugly speech still isn’t the aim in a specific shooting. Quotes plus a bystander isn’t fact. You posted it as one. Most of your posts have the same hypocrisy in them. I’m kinda done arguing if that’s all it is. Hope you find God. Goodbye.
If a pattern can make your inference right, it can make mine right too. That’s the hypocrisy. You said a pattern of incidents can establish the inference. Hamas fighting from houses, tunnels, and civilian clothes is a documented pattern in this war, including NYT reporting off Hamas’s own videos. Your incidents are still a dead child and a bystander who saw no fighter. That can start a question. It doesn’t show the aim. You don’t get to count your repeats as proof and treat this method as off-limits in the same scenes. Count both patterns and you still don’t have a fact. You have an inference you already posted as one.
@KyzerBengal@thorshammer914@realBobStein@MarkRuffalo https://t.co/XBWyrdfnE9
https://t.co/8wfG1jCg7I
https://t.co/0FZwH5njuy
https://t.co/02r3GPunRx
https://t.co/AHjQU2Sdws
pattern is inference as you have stated
@KyzerBengal@thorshammer914@realBobStein@MarkRuffalo the point of those hypotheticals is pattern same as yours its a pattern hamas uses those tactics and your biased source never checked them as i have said before and as we have previously stated pattern is inference
@KyzerBengal@thorshammer914@realBobStein@MarkRuffalo how much of a dumbass are you my point was never to say my allegation was true it was because your allegation is just as wrong hahaha jesus christ dude dude you really suck at proving your point