False rape cases are being registered for a mere 30,000 rupees
This auto driver's sister got a rape case registered against a man
That man hired a woman in 30K to cry rape against the auto driver
Well done @aligarhpolice police for arresting them all 👏
I just hope rape case filed by the auto driver's sister is genuine and not false otherwise you should throw them also in Jail
#falserape
@bb_b_bb_b_bb Mulla dick sucker honda shernis have this old habit of bringing hindu festivals into everything.
Tum log maa chuda lo kuch nhi hone wala tum logo ka
#WorldClassJudiciary
Paramjit Singh Bedi v. State of Punjab
Paramjit Singh biggest mistake was that he was born in India. In this case, 17 years of Paramjit life have been wasted.
In 2009, an FIR was registered against Paramjit under Sections 363, 366A, 366 and 376 of the IPC.
In 2012, the Sessions Court acquitted Paramjit under Section 366 but sentenced him to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment under Section 376 for rape. What is worth noting here is that the Sessions Court found the victim testimony partially unreliable, and therefore acquitted Paramjit under Section 366, which is related to kidnapping and abduction.
In 2013, the High Court upheld the conviction, and here the High Court relied upon Section 114A of the Indian Evidence Act, meaning a statutory presumption regarding consent, basically that what the girl says about consent is presumed to be true.
Paramjit challenged this conviction in the Supreme Court, where the evidence was examined and Paramjit was ultimately acquitted.
Reasons for the acquittal:-
1. There were serious contradictions in the victim testimony.
2. The victim testimony was considered unreliable for one charge, while the same testimony was relied upon to convict him under another charge. The Supreme Court found this approach to be wrong.
3. The victim stayed with the accused for five to six days and travelled around the city with him on a scooter. The Supreme Court specifically took note of this fact.
4. The Court also made it clear that a positive medical report, by itself, does not prove that rape took place.
And then come the same questions:-
1. Why was no action taken against the Sessions Court and High Court judges?
2. Why was no action taken against the girl?
3. Who will compensate Paramjit for the six years he spent in jail?
With such utterly ridiculous laws and an equally absurd judicial system, one thing is certain:- India is not going to become VISHWAGURU.
@rashtrapatibhvn
भारत की न्यायपालिका का सार्वजनिक सम्मान होता हुआ
आरोपी जज को शुद्ध हिंदी यानी कि देश की प्रथम भाषा में सम्मानित करता हुआ
दिल्ली की पटियाला कोर्ट, वीडियो कॉन्फ्रेंसिंग।
जज कोई अरिदमन सिंह है.!!