Canada
Your prime minister was installed. It's true.
He then won the election after having little chance.
Then he made deals to steal a majority.
His biggest accomplishment is enriching his own portfolio.
You are the only nation in the g20 having a recession.
They've shut down debate and are just ramming through bills to become law and entrap you in a digital prison.
And the majority defend it, love it, thank it.
Canada is being fleeced, we're being robbed, and most aren't mad at the people doing it, they're mad at the people seeing it.
@CanadianPolling The minute they bring back the death penalty it will be used to execute dissidents by the Liberal party. Be careful what you wish for.
🚨🚨⚠️ CANADA: BILL C‑22 IS AN 11‑ALARM FIRE ⚠️🚨🚨
If you live in Canada and you’re using “the cloud” for email, documents, messaging back‑ups, or anything sensitive, you need to understand what’s happening right now with Bill C‑22 (“Lawful Access Act”).
This isn’t tech paranoia. It’s a structural change to how easy it is for the state to get identifying data and metadata about you from the services you rely on. Once that scaffolding is built and normalized, it’s almost impossible to dismantle.
What C‑22 does in plain language
It expands “lawful access” tools so police and intelligence can get subscriber information and other identifying data from telecoms and online service providers more easily.
Subscriber information isn’t just your name: it includes account identifiers, contact details, service periods, and device‑related info – more than enough to link accounts, IPs and devices back to you and to map who talks to whom.
It creates a framework for the government to order core providers and “electronic service providers” to collect and retain metadata on everyone for up to a year.
It allows secret orders and gag clauses so providers can be forced to cooperate while being legally barred from telling you.
Translation: if your email, files, chats, or projects live entirely in other people’s infrastructure, those systems can be turned into quiet mapping tools for your relationships, your habits, your reading lists, your political work, and your sources.
This hits whistleblowers, journalists, activists, psychiatric survivors, and anyone in vulnerable situations first. They’re the ones who rely on “private” DMs, proton‑style accounts, self‑hosted services behind the cloud, and ad‑hoc leak channels. If the metadata around those channels is being retained and is easy to compel, anonymity evaporates.
You do not need to be doing anything illegal to get burned. The risk is in how easy it becomes to:
reconstruct who contacted a tips line or advocacy group;
trace who suddenly started emailing or uploading documents around a scandal;
link pseudonymous accounts back to real‑world identities via devices, IPs and patterns;
map entire networks of people based purely on who interacts with whom and when.
PSA: STOP BEING A SITTING DUCK
If you haven’t already, treat tonight as the line in the sand.
Get critical email out of generic cloud accounts. If all of your sensitive mail lives in a single mainstream provider account tied to your real name and phone, that’s your weakest link.
Pull your sensitive files off “free” clouds. Anything that would harm you or others if it were deanonymized (whistleblowing material, mental‑health records, political strategy, legal fights) should not sit indefinitely on someone else’s servers under their log and retention regime.
Assume metadata will be kept. Even if content is encrypted, logs can show which accounts connected, when, from where, and in what patterns. Act accordingly.
Segment your life. Don’t run your entire political, professional, and personal existence through one identity, one mailbox, one cloud drive. Compartmentalization is not tinfoil; it’s basic safety.
This is not about “go off‑grid tomorrow.” It’s about refusing to be a passive, undefended target while the rules are being rewritten around you. There is still time to move, but not if you treat C‑22 as just another bill.
🚨🚨 Call to action 🚨🚨
Move your high‑risk email and files off generic cloud platforms tonight.
Tell your friends, coworkers, and comrades in Canada that Bill C‑22 is an 11‑alarm fire for privacy and accountability.
Email your MP and opposition MP's and tell them to oppose C‑22’s metadata‑retention and lawful‑access framework.
This isn’t about perfection. It’s about refusing to leave every part of your life sitting on someone else’s hard drive, waiting to be queried. Bill C‑22 is trying to turn “the cloud” into a surveillance‑ready archive. Don’t be a sitting duck.
Canadian politics is FUBAR.
The PM travels the world to establish a new world order with one government, the leader of the opposition is going on about used car taxes instead of censorship & surveillance, the Quebecois are squawking about a pipeline thousands of KMs away, the NDP wants to jail Elon Musk for being a trillionaire, Doug Ford doesn’t have enough jails to deal with bail reform, the Ontario liberals are trying to cancel their only viable candidate, Indians want the premier of Alberta jailed for holding a referendum, the liberals are using their stolen majority to ram through dystopian surveillance bills and nobody knows wtf is going on any more am I taking crazy pills
@Tablesalt13 They aren’t compelled to break your 3rd party encryption, but if they are a data controller (ie. they provide the service) they have to hand it over. This is not much of a back-pedal.
“this is a biometric harvesting operation masquerading as child safety”. And that’s just the UK version. Canada won’t grandfather anyone, and it doesn’t even matter. This is BS, age gating social media is just a Trojan Horse for digital ID necessity.
Look closely at what the government is promising you here (published 15th June). They claim that if your account is over 16 years old, you are safe from the dragnet. But then comes the casual, insidious trap: if you do have to prove your age, they say it will be 'as simple as a facial recognition check.'
Do not let that soft language fool you. 'As simple as a face scan' means surrendering the unchangeable, mathematical architecture of your human identity.
Here is the brutal reality: this is a biometric harvesting operation masquerading as child safety. Your biometrics - your face, your irises, your unique biological signature - are the most sensitive pieces of data you possess. If a password leaks, you reset it. If your biometric blueprint is hacked, leaked, or scraped into a government database, your identity is compromised for life. They are normalising the idea that you must scan your body just to access the public square. It is the ultimate blueprint for a permanent digital cage.
Once your biological data is stored in their centralised databases (which it will be) your privacy is dead forever. You aren't just logging into an app - you are voluntarily handing over the keys to a corporate and state surveillance engine.
An app-level 'under 16s ban' is universally recognised by security experts as unpoliciable and structurally broken.
Following the mass backlash from tech companies, the UK government reconsidered its stance... But this is what they're not telling you - something we have warned you about for years.
The UK Gov already appointed an expert panel to 'fast-track' a national, official Digital ID scheme earlier this year, that will (despite their current lies) eventually serve as the master credential to 'solve the problem' with an unenforceable 'under 16s social media ban.'
It has NEVER been about Children's safety. Ever. So, to coerce compliance of all UK adults, we will soon see the beginning of another textbook manufactured crisis.
Do not be fooled by the ongoing political theatre. The predictable failure of this ban is completely by design. As the system intentionally glitches, the media will flood the headlines with weaponised fear - amplifying stories of online horror and grooming to rile up panicked parents.
Once again, they are engineering a crisis of fear so severe that the public will ultimately beg for the exact Digital ID grid they would have otherwise rejected.
Cast your mind back to September 2025: 'mass illegal migration' didn't work as an excuse for Digital ID, did it? So the Epstein Class now use Children's safety as the excuse.
By wrapping the digital credential inside the emotionally charged issue of child safety, dissent is effectively silenced. Anyone arguing against the tracking framework is politically painted as being against child protection.
https://t.co/0I7TNOXtJq
I hate saying it, but I have to be real.
Canadians, no one is coming to save us.
The globalists are in control and are outright brazen with their intent and disdain towards those that value freedom.
Those that know and are prepared to weather the storms ahead, I salute you.
To those that are scared, confused and/or paralyzed, you must break free from the psychological prison they have created for you.
Do not panic, put the time in to heal and then embrace those that are eager to welcome and walk with you. Use discernment and never surrender your dignity.
Now is not the time for hesitation.
It is time to actualize.
I will help as many as I can, and am with you till the end 🫡👊🕺💃
@mashakleiner@One_BCHQ@SipsintheCity@Kamloops_SD73 She’s the ex-chair of sd73 DPAC (district level parents advisory committee), she resigned weeks ago because she’s running for trustee. She’s an activist who cares only for ideology, cares not for any facts to underpin it. God help us all.
@anac_tad@Tablesalt13 If the went to 🇺🇸, hopefully they can avoid those enhanced/distributed ticks, or they won’t be eating steaks for long. We have the same issue in 🇨🇦, but it seems to have been deployed more heavily in 🇺🇸.
Digital ID: Here is the WEF's plan for you, straight from their website.
Their goal is to create a situation whereby every aspect of daily life—healthcare, banking, food, travel, internet, social media, communications, energy usage, etc—requires a valid digital ID, without which you are locked out.
Once that situation is in place, the conditions of validity can be adjusted to anything they want.
You didn't take the latest experimental mRNA injection? Then your Digital ID is invalid.
You posted something deemed "misinformation" on social media? Then your Digital ID is invalid.
Your social credit score fell too low? Your Digital ID wil be invalid.
You exceeded your monthly carbon allowance? Your Digital ID will be invalid.
You voiced criticism of your new technocratic overlords? Then your Digital ID is invalid.
If governments are ever allowed to succeed in rolling out digital ID—even if it's through the back door via under-16 social media bans—we will find ourselves living in a giant open-air digital prison, from which it will be virtually impossible to ever escape.
But they can only succeed if humanity complies with their agenda. DO NOT COMPLY.
🚨 Canada’s institutional capture is now complete.
Since 2015 the Liberals have appointed:
⚖️ 740 of 1,000 federal judges
🏛️ 7 of 9 Supreme Court justices
📜 100 of 105 senators
📰 Fund 30% of every reporter’s salary in Canada
And that’s just the foundation.
Add to that:
📺 CBC: $1.4B annually to defend the Liberal narrative
🏦 Bank of Canada: Redefining recession in real time
📊 StatsCan: Counting Census workers as permanent jobs
📬 Senate: Hiding 240,000 democratic postcards in a warehouse
🌐 Bill C-8: MPs can delete you from the internet without a judge
🎙️ Carney on tape: Admitting central bankers bypassed voters on ESG
They control the courts.
They control the Senate.
They control the Supreme Court.
They control the media funding.
They control the state broadcaster.
Now they want to control the internet.
Not one institution left standing independently.
This is not democracy.
This is managed decline with Canadian characteristics.
And most Canadians are still waiting for CBC to tell them about it.
🇨🇦 Repost and Bookmark🔖 this post.
🇨🇦💀 #CdnPoli #Democracy #InstitutionalCapture #Carney #DefundCBC
@smith71jason@johnwtomkinson The entire country has turned into people pandering for grants. Fighting their siblings to suckle at the tit of government redistribution.
@JasonBassler1@TLAVagabond Servers to meet the compute demand for actual digital tools, fine. Servers for surveillance, not fine. We need to restrict the latter. Surely we could legislate this?