Impulse is the first piece of the WarpCore family to go public: open-source delivery versus payment for Kaspa, where both legs of a trade settle in one transaction or each side takes its own back.
One hash lock also links a Kaspa vault to a Solana escrow, so a Kaspa token can settle against USDC on Solana. It’s an early step toward making WarpCore available to everyone.
https://t.co/YwGDDcy34n
#kaspa
Abdul El-Sayed wants to hand Michigan over to the radical left and their insane ideology.
@MikeRogersForMI wants to fight for all Michiganders and put America first.
Michigan, let’s send Abdul packing and tell him we don’t want people who hate our country in the US Senate.
ULTIMO MINUTO!
El Presidente del Tribunal Superior Electoral de Brasil, Kassio Nunes, acaba de hacer una advertencia demoledora contra Lula..."No existe ninguna regla que permitiera extender las votaciones dos horas", como lo hizo a juro y en forma personal el exabogado de Lula y ahora miembro del Tribunal Supremo, puesto por Lula, Cristiano Zanin...Esa extensión, solo en áreas donde dominaba el partido de Lula, revertió la tendencia que era a favor de Bolsonaro...Da a entender Nunes que la elección presidencial del domingo en Brasil puede ser anulada, toda, o los votos emitidos después de la hora oficial de cierre...En este último caso, Bolsonaro sería el vencedor y nuevo Presidente de Brasil.
🚨 BRAZIL: THE FREE WORLD IS WATCHING!
Election Day is TOMORROW. Brazilians head to the polls for a presidential runoff between Flávio Bolsonaro and leftist incumbent Lula.
Look at this energy in the streets. South America is waking up. People are done with failed leftist rule and hungry for freedom again.
Flávio Bolsonaro is the clear America First choice in this race. Lula is the past Brazil needs to leave behind.
Time for the people of Brazil to take their country BACK!
Vote like your future depends on it. Because it does.
Crypto is back in Israel’s national conversation. ⚡️
Earlier this year, KaspaCom CEO @cryptosione appeared on national economic TV to talk Kaspa, its technology, and adoption.
Tune in. 👇
i’ll do everything in my power on the technical side to help this initiative move forward and navigate any protocol-level obstacles along the way.
on a personal note, Alex has a rare mix of technical depth, bizdev talent and deep Kaspa knowledge. i honestly can’t think of anyone better suited to lead it, and i really appreciate him taking this on
My prophecy: Kaspa core will keep researching, budling and delivering. Yonatan will continue to lead it in terms of vision, far-reaching long-term research and short-term endless day-to-day brainstorming. Core R&D will continue to scale and expand to wider and wider circles. Builders and developers will keep joining L2 testnets and build dapps which utilize Kaspa’s inherent superiorities. Kaspa’s marketing will decentralize more and more. There will be no central voice. As part of the many voices, core members will find ways to communicate their vision and nuanced discussions to the broader crypto community. Truthfulness will prevail. Kaspa core will identify with people who actively contribute, build, research and think about Kaspa from the moment they wake up until the moment they fall asleep. Educators, pedagogues and evangelizers will do what they do best and communicate at different levels based on their knowledge and expertise. I will keep researching, thinking, developing and posting about Kaspa and speak as directly, accurately and truthfully as I can. I love you all (not a prophecy). We just started.
The case for the uniqueness of fast pow
tl;dr
Finality has two moving parts: (i) fast inclusion (= high bps, how quickly a tx gets into a block), and (ii) fast confirmations (= how quickly that tx becomes irreversible). Any system with rapid block production can achieve the first. The second is where the tension shows: in pos, fast confirmations press directly against decentralization. In fast pow, the two properties are decoupled.
prologue
A few weeks ago I came across Solana’s founder claiming: “Solana is the fastest monetary system in the world”. Since Kaspa already runs at a faster block rate, I was curious to check Solana’s finality times. That curiosity quickly pointed me to a deeper issue: not raw speed, but how speed interacts with decentralization.
——————
The tension is structural. In pos, finality means accumulating staked votes, and the more decentralized the stake distribution, the more time is required to reach finality. Here I’m not talking about hardware requirements or validator specs. The axis I’m discussing is centralization around the security mechanism itself: stake in pos vs. hardware in pow. To be secure, a block must be confirmed by a supermajority--typically >66.7% of the total economic stake. In a truly decentralized network, where n stakers with uniform share grows without bound, the time to coordinate this supermajority becomes a real bottleneck.
Pow works differently. It samples the hardware space without requiring the protocol to explicitly collect evidence from a majority of miners. Each block is itself a statistical proof that the finder out-competed the full network’s hash power. This process--and its timing--remains independent of how many individual miners participate.
Ethereum’s researchers understood this when moving to pos. Unlike Solana, which tolerates concentration to reach ~13-second finality, Ethereum’s designers could not accept that trade-off. Their solution was to introduce rotating committees. A rotating committee is a smaller subset of validators, randomly chosen from the full set, that votes on behalf of everyone else.
But this comes with a different security model, known in the literature as exposure to a BFT adaptive attacker. The committee is selected first and then votes. That “select-then-work” sequence is theoretically exposed to adaptive attackers, since members are known in advance. Pow, by contrast, is “work-then-select”: the winner is only revealed after the work is done. Think of it this way: in pos, you know who the referees are before the game starts, which gives an attacker time to pressure them. In pow, you only learn who won after the work is already done, which removes that attack surface. So n confirmations provide consistent confidence regardless of miner granularity, and the system stays secure even under adaptive targeting.
Beyond attack subtleties, the real issue is economic weight. When I send a billion-dollar transfer in a pos system, the question I care about is simple: how much stake is actually securing it? A committee vote provides strong statistical evidence, but only a true supermajority puts the full economic stake of the network behind my confirmation. In other words, a sampled committee may convince me that things are probably safe, but only the weight of the entire stake provides an overwhelming guarantee. And this is exactly where pow shines: each confirmation is not just a probability estimate, but a direct proof of work done against the full hash power of the network, no matter how many miners there are.
closing remark
I don’t claim to know every engineering detail of Ethereum or Solana. But I’m convinced the core principle holds.
I’ll state it simply: fast pow uniquely enables fast finality without forcing a compromise on decentralization.
@Kaspamoos@michaelsuttonil@elperorr hahah :)) well, you dont deserve even an answer - coz it is just a waste. keep being the judge with your keyboard and worthless words in your basement .
@michaelsuttonil@Kaspamoos@elperorr well I am coming up with ‘kaspa-dev-tool’ to enable even non technical people by using LLM. I will share publicly when ready. I am using this for my AI project. it is you @Kaspamoos not doing a shit and bothering people like @michaelsuttonil and us. do something and be useful
just to be clear, there’s a lot going on across many fronts. it’s just not helpful to talk about things before they happen; they simply need to happen, and serious things take time. some serious efforts also won’t necessarily mature for various reasons, which is another reason ppl don’t always lay out their plans publicly (until they happen). i anticipate something of a “baby boom” in a few months, but teams will simply pursue delivery rather than talk