> Opposed reservation
> Opposed Ambedkar
> Made Ambedkar lose election
> Made Ambedkar resign from cabinet
> Criticised Periyar
Blud had guts.. what a man!!
Yes, young Indian talent will create the next Intel and Qualcomm, but for someone else in another country.
Don’t guilt trip them for not staying back, as you’ve made it impossible for merit to thrive in India👎
How? By filing cases under the "Atrocious" Act against erudite professors in premier institutions for preventing "young talent" from cheating in examinations.
1979: Morarji Desai set up the Mandal Commission. Vajpayee and Advani were ministers in his government.
1981: The RSS officially approved the Mandal Commission.
1989: The BJP’s manifesto included the Mandal Commission.
1992: The Supreme Court said that reservations in promotions were illegal.
2001: The BJP made multiple amendments to the Constitution to overturn Supreme Court rulings.
2014: The Sonia-led government expanded the SC/ST Act.
2015: Modi made the SC/ST Act draconian. It became “ModiAct.”
2018: The Supreme Court said the Act was draconian.
2018: Modi amended the Act to make it even more draconian.
2026: Modi introduced UGC rules to throw young Savarna minds from the General Category into hell.
It was the BJP—and it has always been the BJP—that harmed Savarna communities.
Congress feared losing General Category votes. But we Savarna fools are the BJP’s vote bank. The BJP never had to worry about losing our votes.
WE ARE THE FOOLS.
@neha_laldas@ajeetbharti@BJP4India #ReservationReformआंदोलन #ModiAct_लगाओ_पैसा_कमाओ
#ModiAct
#UGC_काला_कानून_वापस_लो
#UGC_ROLL_BACK
Many scholars including Donald Davis note Dharmasastras like Manusmriti were idealized texts, not state-enforced law codes in pre-colonial India. British rule elevated them. Genetics (Moorjani 2013) still show major ANI-ASI mixing ended ~1900-4200 ya, aligning with the rise of stricter endogamy norms in that era.
@grok@scsthindu Manusmriti and other Dharmashastras were never enforced uniformly on strictly anywhere. It is agreed upon by many scholars that it was never used as a law code before the British. Please educate @scsthindu.
In Saṃhitas (Rigveda ~1500-1000 BCE) no rigid endogamy: intergroup marriages common, social mobility present, gotra rules absent. Dharmasastras (Dharmasutras from ~3rd c. BCE, Manusmriti ~2nd-3rd c. CE per Olivelle) enforce strict varna/gotra endogamy. Genetics (Moorjani 2013) shows ANI-ASI mixing ended ~1900 ya, matching the Dharmasastra era as dated by historians.
@SidharthShqcgn Hey @grok, please explain on how there was no rigid endogamy in the Saṃhitas, but rigid endogamy was enforced in the Dharmasastra era and how we can show that from genetic mapping to about 2,000 years ago... Exactly when Dharmasastra were written as confirmed by the historians..
@scsthindu Dharmashastras were never the law of the land. Stop lying. If they were really enforced, Shudras wouldn't be able to become kings and soldiers even before Muslims arrived.
This obsession with Manusmriti is modern.
जो भी फर्जी SC/ST एक्ट से पीड़ित है, वो कृपया इस हेल्पलाइन नंबर पर सम्पर्क करें👇
प्रीत भाई और उनकी legal टीम आपकी मदद करेंगे!
बहुत बढ़िया पहल @BhaiPreetSingh 🙌🙏
Was Erode Venkatappa Ramasamy Naicker really a social reformer? No, he was not!
Ramasamy was an anti-Hindu, anti-Brahmin thug.
He was a hypocritical, hateful and repulsive man.
He was a Misogynist.
He was a political and social spoiler.
He wanted a Nazi-style genocide of Brahmins.
He was never in favour of women’s empowerment or liberation.
He was casteist and hated Dalits.
He was a British stooge, brought in to wreck the spiritual fabric of Tamil Nadu and the unity in diversity of India, Bharat.
He was a very ordinary man whose image was blown out of proportion after the DMK formed the government in 1967.
I have written about Ramasamy in detail in my quoted article!
BJP MLA from Delhi, Gajender Drall has been booked under SC/ST Act by BJP Mandal President Sunil Kumar.
Wishing more and more Savarn BJP leaders and ministers get booked under SC/ST Act and don't get bail for two years.
पत्रकार - आप दलित हो आपके हाथ में ॐ लिखा है और हाथ में कलावा है।
पीड़ित परिवार - हम हिंदू है, मुस्लिम थोड़ी ना है। हिन्दुओं में तो कलवा पहनते है।
पत्रकार - आपके भाई की हत्या हो गई चंद्रशेखर रावण क्यों नहीं आया ?
पीड़ित परिवार - चूंकि आरोपी मुस्लिम है ।
पत्रकार - अगर आरोपी मुस्लिम नहीं होते तो?
पीड़ित परिवार - चंद्रशेखर 100% आता
पत्रकार - अब किस पर भरोसा है?
पीड़ित परिवार - अब केवल योगी आदित्यनाथ जी पर भरोसा है।
If someone files a false SC/ST case against you, instead of panicking, you should do the following:
- Approach the High Court directly and challenge the false FIR under Section 482.
- If the case is clearly false, the court may grant anticipatory bail.
- For an offence involving insult, the incident generally needs to occur in a “place within public view”; it does not necessarily have to be a public place.
- After winning the case, you may consider filing a defamation case against the person who made the false allegations.
Educate yourself.
@NewsAlgebraIND The WAQF way! have to Heed in toto to the Master. Not to mention more Secular awards ..... Hindus best be prepared for next round of Humiliation.... 1 person cannot , never will be the Destiny make of India ever....! Merely a Contributor worst as in this case EXPLOITER. PODA.