@BuffJones2 Because blow off tops (which are noise in entire distribution) are easier to spot. Model still has the same logic it just follows 1458 days average instead 365.
I still like this #Bitcoin Stock to Income model.
Now, don’t hate on me too much, my fellow ₿Itcoin Power Law brothers.
The ₿itcoin Stock to Income model is better than the Stock to Flow model:
1. Stock to flow does NOT account for transaction fees earned by miners, only new ₿itcoin. Stock to income includes miner fees in flow.
2. Stock to flow only used data until March 2019, which is when it came out. Stock to income is re-generated daily, ensuring an accurate model.
3. Stock to income aims to paint a more accurate projection of the ₿itcoin price, using current data and accounting for miners transaction fees earned as flow.
Stock To Income Model by @_digitalik_ incorporates tx fee income into the mix as block subsidy becomes less and less impactful over time
https://t.co/ZwMWBMjDVJ 👀
Bitbo is excited to announce the NEW stock to income model.
Made by @_digitalik_, it aims to improve upon stock to flow by incorporating miner fees & daily re-calculations.
@samuelkullmann@BTC_for_Freedom Aren't they tax free only if you're private investor? As far as I know private investor criteria is not so easy to meet if yor main source of income is coming from crypto investments. If you know something that I don't - Im all ears (eyes actually) 🤓
@100trillionUSD "Ah yes"? Really? First you drop shit on my work in front of 2M viewers and then "ah yes"? Both of those charts are result of your modelling and if you think one of them is "BAD" then it is on you and not me. If you decided to give up on one of your models you should say so loud.
@100trillionUSD Would you care to elaborate on what exactly is wrong with bitbo implementation? I have both versions there and they both have higher precision (showing daily) than what you originaly published. And if you think it is BAD I will be happy to remove your name from them if you want.