Sort of reflecting on how THE BRUTALIST and NICKEL BOYS are probably our two most significant films this year. Wildly ambitious conceptualizations executed with precise, innovative craft & a devotion to confronting dark truths of mid-20th Century America.
Decade defining art.
A Different Man: I loved The Substance, but this is the essential self-hatred text of 2024. Effortlessly smart, a movie with a million layers underneath a cruel, nasty joke of getting exactly what you want. Sebastian Stan and Adam Pearson are unbelievable.
@RomeForReal For sure! That’s sort of what I’m getting at in my rambling, mostly that because the dolly is a fundamental tool, it’s prevalent in AI art not because it’s necessary but because it is just replicating what is common.
Those who say this looks like AI made it simply lack an understanding of film as language, how complex that language is, AND why “cinematic” AI art really isn’t cinematic even though it will overuse simple (yet fundamental) parts of that language- in this case, a dolly in.
Something else is out there 🏔️ Discover THE LEGEND OF OCHI, a bold new wonder from filmmaker Isaiah Saxon. Starring Helena Zengel, Finn Wolfhard, Emily Watson, and Willem Dafoe. Coming soon.
So, as this trailer is edited using multiple dolly-in establishing shots (that AI art often tries to replicate), people are conflating a real knowledge of craft with AI art’s oversimplification of cinematic art & language.
A lot of “cinematic” AI art you see on the internet are misty, fantasy lands & characters, paired with some sort of simple movement, be it dolly in, out & across, etc.
The dolly is so effective in the language of cinema because it draws the viewer in & adds depth to a frame.