The Prophet ﷺ said:
“Before the Hour there will come years of deception, in which the liar will be believed and the truthful will be disbelieved, the treacherous will be trusted and the trustworthy will be considered treacherous, and the Ruwaybiḍah will speak.”
They asked, “Who are the Ruwaybiḍah?”
He said, “The insignificant (foolish or base) person who speaks about the affairs of the public.”
Some questions aren't meant for a comment section.
Introducing Ask Abu Mussab — private, one-on-one consultation sessions where you can sit down (virtually) with Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari and talk through what's actually on your heart.
Islaam. Marriage. Parenting. Doubts. Direction.
Whatever it is, this is a space built for honest conversation and real guidance — not a fatwa service, just sincere advice from someone who has spent almost 20 years teaching and guiding people from all walks of life.
🕒 15, 30, or 60-minute paid sessions
🔒 100% confidential
💻 Held over video call, wherever you are
🌍 We're in beta — your feedback helps shape the experience
Book your session
https://t.co/tmvjwzddGu
Something that must be addressed is that there are scam courses called "aalim" courses, making laypeople think that they become a 'aalim after completion!
Know, may Allah direct you to goodness, that if you even study 4 years at an islamic uni, you JUST became a student of 'ilm!
If you find yourself arguing with someone who has been affected by the ʿaqīdah of the Khawārij, send him this playlist by Shaykh @Alhaqqan90 حفظه الله.
If he's sincere, he will leave his way.
If he's not, then arguing with him is a waste of time.
https://t.co/OE72PSTtt0
Genuine question:
Does Uthman Farooq consult anyone before making major decisions in daʿwah, such as debating slanderous, vile, dishonest Christian apologists who will inevitably clip the debate and milk it for anti-Islam content?
This trend seriously needs to stop.
Started with this gem of a playlist, very very very detailed. The best seerah series in english by our beloved @FarisHammadi
Pearls from the Seerah https://t.co/tGU7NUCDIm via @YouTube
We need less “debaters”, more Ulama. Be students of knowledge. Follow the steps of the ulama who are upon the way of the salaf, not the steps of these so called “debaters”.
Can debates be good?
Absolutely, if it is within correct conditions. Such as it not being for views…
Young women are usually raised without having knowledge of anything from the Quran, without knowing even how to wash from menstruation, without knowing the basics of prayers, and without being told what are the rights due for her husband.
- ibn ul-Jawzi rahimahullah
Teach girls!
May Allah have mercy on our father, the founder of the UAE, HH Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan. He said:
“Anyone who remains silent about something wrong I have done, while believing otherwise is correct, then (firstly) Allah is my witness; and all of you are my witnesses; that the sin is upon him, not upon me.”
Meaning: Do not remain silent if you see me in the wrong; advise me.
This is the path of our leaders after him.
All of these are being taught by our ustaadh @Alhaqqan90 at @SokAcademy
https://t.co/i8wPMFEjT8 use this to gain beneficial knowledge and then upon you is to teach it to others barakAllahu fiekum!
As expected, the K͟hārijī runs away and declines the debate offer. However, so that he does not look completely shameless in doing so, he throws out the “mubāhalah” cop out as a counteroffer instead.
Typical.
I did not expect him to accept, and for two main reasons:
Firstly, because this k͟habīth is not fit for debating. He knows he cannot answer a shubhah that is posed to him in real time that he’s never seen before, (and we have many new ones, from their scholars and from the Salaf and the Khalaf that we haven’t shown for possible future debates ). He would be shocked and dumbfounded, and would begin stuttering on the spot, just like he did on that live around two years ago. The only way this guy can operate on this topic is by hiding behind 2+ hour videos where he monologues and PDFs that take him months to produce while he attempts to find a way to give Jahmī taʾwīl to the clear āthār of the Salaf.
Secondly, because the people upon his manhaj, and those who share his beliefs, know that he is not fit for it. They know he would embarrass them, and that it would be a complete bloodbath. He knows how to dodge a bullet, I’ll give him that.
I’ll let these images speak for themselves.
The khariji cycle
- Use a weak evidence
- Have it explained to you
- Dont use it again for a few months in hope that people will forget about the explanation of said evidence
- Regurgitate it months later
This is all they are capable of doing - the insincerity is laughable as they intentionally spread things that we have already explained to them
Same applies for this claim now which is being recycled due to the liar Mohammed Hijab
Video and scan refutation is attached below from my old tweet months ago where another fool tried to make the same point and then deleted his tweet
Whats funny here is the video the brother is refuting a Sufi who makes the same claim. We have Sufis, Khawarij, Ikhwanis and Shia all uniting against Ahlus Sunnah and spreading lies against Sheikh Rabee and this is only a further testament that he is a thorn in their necks رحمه الله رحمة واسعة
https://t.co/wBvLJ3KrTu
If you’re currently watching and enjoying the World Cup, and you also hold Nāṣir al-Fahd to be a trustworthy scholar, then sorry to break the news to you: according to your scholar, you are watching and enjoying kufr and shirk.
Naṣīr al-Fahd in Al-Fatāwā al-Ḥāʾiriyah, pages 35-36:
He was asked: Do competitions and the rules within them fall under “judging by other than what Allāh has revealed”? And if so, what is the ruling on those who engage in them, practice them, and acknowledge them, including the referees?
He replied: “The principle is that whoever judges between two—even children in marbles or shooters in shooting—is a judge, as established by the Ṣaḥābah and narrated by the scholars such as Shaykh al-Islām and the Imams of the daʿwah. It is not permissible for any judge to rule except by the judgment of Allāh and His Messenger ﷺ.
So know that the referee in sports competitions is a judge who rules by other than what Allāh has revealed, ruling by FIFA’s laws—may Allāh curse them. For example, if a player intentionally hits another, the ruling in Sharʿī law is qisās (retaliation), whereas their ruling is a red card. Ruling by other than what Allāh revealed is disbelief. This is one of those matters in which the ‘maʿrūf’ (good) has become ‘munkar’ (evil), and the ‘munkar’ has become ‘maʿrūf’. And Allāh is the One whose help is sought.”