lebron james reportedly confused the actus reus with the mens rea and read an unjustified restriction within the meaning of ‘in part’ without any proper explanation as to why the substantiality requirement should be limited to numbers alone 🤣🤣
@redf0undation although important to note that the IPCC skews inherently conservative in projections due to its general structure and the reports needing approval from the member states so i wouldnt take that at face value too much
this take is pretty popular but in my experience ive never been able to say we should analyse postmodern fascism without just saying everyone is literally a direct hitler/nazi/gestapo analogue without people getting really genuinely mad at me it doesnt really make sense
«How» nuclear test, 14 kilotons, 91 m tower, Nevada, June 5, 1952. These photographs were taken with a «Rapatronic» high-speed camera 0.2, 0.7, 4.4 and 11 milliseconds after detonation.
i got upto the last episode of Six Feet Under and ive been putting it off for days becus i cant even handle that rn and i cant stop thinking about how the episode is called ‘Everyones Waiting’ like damn dont rush me please like was that an intended interpretation
i saw khmer rouge apologia on the timeline so i popped open an ECCC trial judgement PDF becaus thats what these things are for really https://t.co/Us88GttPMr
extremely interesting set of words on page 2251 of casefile no. 002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC on interpreting the jurisprudence of article 2 of the genocide convention and the dolus specialis i wonder if more than like 3 people in the world ever have read this