@BichlerNitzan It's arguably moderately different. You're keeping your private information out of public records by paying a third party to register in your name. Whether registrant information should be public is a separate question. The price they're charging is definitely extortionate tho.
There really does seem to be a weirdly anti-theoretical outlook shared by the critical theory crowd and the anti-formal methods crowd, functioning in both as an appendage to their respective pessimistic views of the different forms of intellectual labor they're concerned with.
@slow_food@zetalyrae Yeah, that's a reasonable characterization tbh. However I don't think the incompleteness theorems and similar results are relevant to the hypothetical project of formally expressing the ontology/inference rules of mathematics (or of knowledge more generally).
@RobertGReeve@HenryTarquin I don't think you could use any of these authors to coherently argue this point. Eco is the odd one on this list, so I imagine you have a gross misreading of him in mind here.
those of a selfish bureaucratic clique; if we are little better than witless forces to be disposed of by our rulers, we cease to be persons, and the boundaries of our own separate individuality become those of our interests."
ourselves responsible for it in some degree; that we should feel honoured in its honour and shamed in its shame. If we have no responsibility; if our sole duty is to obey passively and blindly in the service of ends that are unknown to us โ ends, nominally public, but usuallyโฆ
There's a tendency to (wrongly imo) write off Marx's theological digressions as cute, incisive jabs which are theoretically opaque and therefore unimportant. This is hardly an original observation, but it seems like such an obvious mistake that it bears repeating.
@anti_minotaur Footwork, IDM, and wonky fairly popular genres that more-or-less fit this description. The parts of Jazz that many people find off-putting are still around in plenty of contemporary genres tbh.
I'm into that kind of thing, but I get where people who aren't are coming from tbh.
@0xsublime_horor Sure. Intensifying cultural norms/practices through self-cultivation seems like the sort of intervention that horrorism says cannot work. Social reproduction in general already consists of many self-affirming cybernetic circuits, so Neo-Confucianism is, at best, superfluous.
@BichlerNitzan Being an social agregate of measurable physical quantities, SNALT is possible to directly measure in theory, though there's likely no practical way of doing so. I'll concede that utils are probably not directly measurable even in theory.