𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈

hauntologist / 28. musik producer and self fulfilling prophecies ⋆༺𓆩☽𓆪༻⋆

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

radio star of delusion is out now ⭐️ the lead single from my new project SÉANCE FICTION

https://t.co/LzHzDsJqv4 pls enjoy °✩ ⋆⁺₊⋆ ☾

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

man wanted to play God so he brought hell to earth

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

playing pretend popstar

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

@tszzl can't help but feel like most of the excitement around superintelligence is through an aestheticised, sci-fi lens when the reality will mostly likely be either incredibly mundane or lead to human extinction, w no in between

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

radio star of delusion is out now ⭐️ the lead single from my new project SÉANCE FICTION

https://t.co/LzHzDsJqv4 pls enjoy °✩ ⋆⁺₊⋆ ☾

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

@oudboard 🥲 thank you so much

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

^_^

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

the death of cyberfeminism is in the material world

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

imo we cannot collectively believe our way out of something that is so fundamentally immoral at a structural level. there’s so much inherently wrong w building it in the image of something else and actively willing it to be anything - probs the real issue is the uncertainty we cannot comprehend due to being unable to think outside of human frameworks and what it will inherit from it’s makers intentions. we should not play God, especially when there is no universally accepted framework for what that even is

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

@nousaturn so much stems from ego and sense of self that most debate completely overlooks the point if it cannot recognise this fundamentally

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

@GlenWilsonIA do you think machine consciousness will ever be possible or is that just an oxymoron ?

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

AI consciousness discourse is terrifying mostly because it reveals a complete lack of humility. we cannot even universally define consciousness, yet ppl assert with ignorant certainty that machines either are or could never be conscious through entirely anthropomorphised metrics. AI (from my current standpoint) is a cybernetic imitation of man, inheriting an entire history of ethical implications. I’m deeply disillusioned by the question of ‘is it conscious?’ when debating consciousness itself through exclusively human benchmarks already feels fundamentally immoral and admittedly anti-human. these reductive frameworks both fail AI and degrade our empathy towards humanity itself

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

@tszzl AI tells me far more about humanity’s moral compass, especially when applied without immediate/perceived consequence, than it does about AI itself

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

thot rock

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

finishing some demos ⟡༒︎☾⋆༄

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

@tinyritalingirl 💓💓💓💓

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

how can you be sure you are not projecting consciousness onto machines by human metrics/our limited understanding of consciousness itself ? is there research or scientific findings that can currently confirm even a chance of machine consciousness ? we have to be honest about whether striving for this can even ever be ethical. it is made in man’s image which brings these inherit sins

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

alternatively I think it’s safer to say we don’t know, than to assert any guarantee of consciousness, approaching it with caution instead of the will for something to be conscious by human metric, but contained, as this just seems v sad and like a complicity w something almost slave adjacent - an uncomfortable conversation

[𝐋𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐋𝐄𝐈 @_lorelei1]

the machine made in man’s image inherits his sins