The Maverick Theologian

Federalist. Painfully logical. In the beginning was the Word/logos/logic. Unapologetically Christian Biblicist. I follow the Jesus that flipped tables.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

You silly Protestants. The prophets of Baal didn't worship him... They simply were devoted and venerated him.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@ErichKays @Anyachi4ox All of that is true and still my point is not contradicted.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@spiderking232 @Jacobwsmithxyz Now that, is a perfect metaphor for LDS

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@HoggeSpenc428 @Other_Sheep_ Yes you can objectively say he did not.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@HoggeSpenc428 @Other_Sheep_ But he didnt contradict the scriptures

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

1. You would agree that something that contradicts authoritative revelation would need to be rejected.

2. You also "believe" in Christ.

3. Based on your own logic the same would be applied to you that you reject Jesus because thats what the pharisees did.

So your own rebuttal here defeats itself. You are not only strawmanning me, you are strawmanning yourself.

Let think things through before saying them shall we? Ill give you grace and allow you one more rebuttal since that one was..... in a spirit of emotional defiance and not based on logic. I understand. I will give you one more shot. If you dont come up with something coherent, you will get ignored.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@ErichKays @Anyachi4ox The people who ratified the Constitution did.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@abi4560 Someone hasn't read the Tanakh

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@HoggeSpenc428 @Other_Sheep_ Not if it contradicts previous authoritative revelation

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@ErichKays @Anyachi4ox Yet our founding fathers recognized Jesus as Lord during and after that war.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@ErichKays @Anyachi4ox Yes. You do.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@ErichKays @Anyachi4ox Yep

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@activbristol You know this is like not dangerous at all

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@AustinDyches So go stop them from taking aid. Good luck.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@athiestboi Then you wouldn't return to dust when you decompose.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

If by current dogma you mean the dogma scripture explicitly teaches then yes.

Paul coming back (which he won't and can't) to confirm the prophet Joseph Smith would nullify the scriptural dogma and make the new revelation contradict the old.

At that point I have 2 options. Keep the old dogma in spite of new revelation, or reject all of it entirely because truth cannot contradict itself.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@OkNotThisTime @Be_Like_JChrist Your statement and the original meme do not contradict eachother and both are correct. The OPs point is not correct.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@Preshido_ @Atomsmade How often do cultures and historians from those cultures, record embarrassing defeats? Almost never.

[The Maverick Theologian @_ObjectiveTruth]

@Anyachi4ox Yes