@adamKDean@MicheleHarmonic@BeRewt@amw7@0xMetamatt Wouldn’t this just make it cheaper for an adversary to bloat the UTXO set to the line so users would have to go back to minUTxO?
I feel like removing minUTxO and increasing fees on outputs would make a lot of sense. This would incentivize consolidating UTxOs while increasing UX.
@Justin_Bons@zacodil While it does reduce latency to ~20 second finality, it still won’t be subsecond like other chains due to probabilistic consensus. There are parameters we could do to reduce this further, but this reduction is a good start. There are tradeoffs for BFT consensus too.
@JaromirTesar@DecentralizeADA The wallets would still have to delegate which does cost a small transaction fee and the min ada for UTXO. Maybe a registration like 5 Ada registration for staking could be Sybil protection at least against too cheap of Sybil attacks. Or we could add another body like dSenate?
@BTC_Ecosse@IOHK_Charles@Cointelegraph Really the only good path here is a retraction.
Do you think it would look good to have stories like founder sues crypto media company? They wouldn’t show the context in the title like they never do.
Even though we would win it still isn’t a good look.
@elraulito I looked into this only problem is the 1% opening and closing fee. Arbitraging the lending at liqwid’s 11% wouldn’t make up for it.
But for the people borrowing on Liqwid for 25% obviously it’s cheaper on fluid tokens.
@FluidTokens I wish that I could type in values to see rates instead of it replacing it with 0 to where you can't even see how much it would cost you to borrow.
Like I don't want to have to pull out my liquidity from Liqwid to see what the rate would be to borrow on Fluid Tokens.
@MicheleHarmonic@MicheleHarmonic Have you looked into the @EffectTS_ typescript package?
Seems like a good way to handle complex error handling and have safer data validation with the schema library as part of it.
@ItsDave_ADA Also, it further boosts their defi activity numbers because sandwich attacks are basically high value wash trades that extract value from the real users.
The only users that profit are the liquidity providers but they are exposed to impermanent loss.
@StakeWithPride@F_Gregaard@Cardano_CF@worldlibertyfi I believe this comes down to how cardano’s accounting model being UTXO is too different than almost every other account based model. While adding support for other account based models like EVM to solana is mostly just porting it over. Cardano’s EUTXO model is totally different.
@IOHK_Charles@bobasfk While I don’t believe that we should cut out IOG especially at this point where they have already worked on leios at risk.
I believe there should be future planning and research that is conducted by the PhDs referenced. This should probably be more for next year’s budget though.