@E3wlG@ArabFree وياك يا رب والله ما أردنا إلا التذكير فالمدينة المنورة ليست كسائر المدن لها هيبة في قلوب المؤمنين لها حرمة ومكانة وكل مسلم ينبغي أن يستشعر ذلك في قوله ولباسه وسلوكه
فلا تقلبو الادوار
الإسبال للنساء، والتقصير للرجال. فلا تجعل ما شُرع لهن زينةً لك، ولا تستبدل هدي النبي ﷺ بعرف الناس
إذا كان الإسبال من زينة المرأة، فكيف يرضاه الرجل لنفسه
للاسف، تغير تويتر كثيرا.
كان كثير من الناس يتنافسون في نشر الفايده، والعلم، وما ينفع المسلم في دينه ودنياه. واليوم اصبح هم كثير من الحسابات جمع المشاهدات والتفاعل باي وسيله، حتى لو كان ذلك بنشر التفاهه او الاستغباء او اثاره الجدل بلا قيمه.
التفاعل يذهب، والارباح تنتهي، لكن الكلمه تبقى، وقد تكون لك او عليك يوم تلقى الله. فليحرص كل واحد منا ان يترك اثرا نافعا، لا مجرد ارقام تزداد ثم تنسى.
Using ISIS images as proof of what Islam teaches is like using a picture of a criminal wearing a doctor’s coat to prove that medicine is a crime.
A religion is judged by its authentic sources, not by the actions of those who violate its teachings. If you are genuinely interested in the truth, then produce a verse from the Qur’an or an authentic hadith that commands what you claim. Images are not evidence; they neither establish truth nor disprove it.
What you’ve presented is not an unavoidable fact; it’s your conclusion, and it still requires evidence.
You’re conflating the religion itself, the interpretations of certain groups, and the actions of individuals. That is not a sound method of analysis.
You claim Islam spread by the sword, yet history shows that the largest Muslim populations today, such as those in Indonesia and Malaysia, embraced Islam through merchants and preachers, not military conquest.
You also claim Christianity has not been associated with violence. Yet history includes the Crusades, the Inquisition, and religious wars in Europe. Despite that, I do not conclude that Christianity is inherently violent, because I distinguish between a religion and the actions of some of its followers. Why not apply the same standard to Islam?
If your standard is the behavior of extremists, then virtually every religion and ideology in history could be labeled violent. If your standard is the actual teachings, then discuss the texts in their full historical and textual context, not isolated quotations or the actions of extremists.
Apply one consistent standard to everyone. That is how truth is sought.
ابو مازن ما شاء الله عليك مواضيعك دائما هادفه ونافعه بارك الله فيك ونفع بك
وللامانه هذا الامر نراه احيانا في بعض المساجد فبعض الناس يتحدثون باصوات مرتفعه او يتبادلون السلام والحديث اثناء توجه الناس للصلاه والبعض يرد على الهاتف بصوت عال مما يشوش على المصلين ويذهب بخشوع المسجد وهيبته
وقد قال النبي ﷺ انما بنيت المساجد لما بنيت له اي للذكر والصلاه وقراءه القران وقال ﷺ اذا رايتم من يبيع او يبتاع في المسجد فقولوا لا اربح الله تجارتك
فاذا كان الشرع نهى عن البيع والشراء في المسجد حفظا لحرمته فكيف برفع الاصوات وتشويش المصلين واشغالهم عن العباده
نسال الله ان يرزقنا جميعا تعظيم بيوته وحسن الادب فيها وان يجعلنا من الذين يعمرون المساجد بالصلاه والذكر والخشوع
Why is there so much hostility toward Islam in the first place?
If you want to judge Islam, then judge it by its original sources: the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah, not by the actions of individuals or governments.
Just as I do not judge Christianity by the actions of some Christians, nor summarize atheism by the behavior of some atheists, it is only fair not to reduce Islam to a particular state or group.
As for Iran, it has its own political and sectarian orientations and does not represent all Muslims.
If you want to see Islam as it is practiced by the majority of Muslims—through prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, charity, service to the Two Holy Mosques, and teaching the Qur’an—then look at the reality in Saudi Arabia, where Islam originated. After that, discuss the actual texts and evidence rather than the stereotypes often promoted in the media.
If your judgment of Islam is based on the actions of some people who claim to follow it, then by the same logic any ideology, nation, or civilization could be judged by its worst examples. I don’t consider that a fair or rational standard.
I had hoped our discussion would focus on texts, evidence, and ideas themselves, rather than on stereotypes and preconceived conclusions. Ideas should be evaluated by the evidence supporting them, not merely by what their opponents say about them.
In any case, it seems we’ve reached a point where continuing this discussion is unlikely to produce anything new. So I thank you for the time you devoted to this conversation. I respect your right to arrive at the conclusions you find convincing, just as I retain the same right.
I wish you a happy and fulfilling life, and may God guide all of us to the truth, wherever it may be found.
What’s interesting is that instead of presenting the evidence you claim to have, you immediately moved to a hypothetical question about leaving Islam.
If you’re confident in your argument, then present it first. Discussions are based on evidence, not on questioning the other person’s intentions.
As for your question, “Would you leave Islam if I proved it?” the answer is simple: I follow the evidence wherever it leads. If I believed Islam could collapse under the weight of a single objection, I would not be a Muslim in the first place.
But before we get there, you need to present your case. So far, you haven’t shown a single contradiction, quoted a single verse, or provided a single argument that can actually be examined.
I also notice that you’re trying to shift the discussion from “Is my claim true?” to “Are you willing to change your mind?”—while the first question hasn’t even been answered yet.
Present your argument and let it be tested. If it’s strong, it will withstand scrutiny. If it’s weak, provocative questions won’t save it.
As for testing my commitment to my faith, that is not done through slogans or hypotheticals, but through examining evidence and facts with fairness and intellectual honesty. I invite you to do the same.
In any case, I do not know you personally. From your profile and the way you speak, you seem to be someone who is often harsh in his language.
When I chose to engage with you, my intention was not to challenge you, score points against you, or win an argument. I spoke with you because I sincerely wanted you to take a closer look at Islam and examine its claims for yourself.
If I wanted a confrontation, I could have spent my time trading insults and accusations. Instead, I invited you to discuss evidence and ideas.
Whether you accept Islam or reject it is ultimately your choice. My purpose was simply to point you toward what I believe is the truth and leave the matter to your own conscience and reason.
الصوت حين يلامس الآيات بخشوع، يتحول من مجرد نغمة بشرية إلى سُلَّمٍ يصعد بك نحو السماء، فتشعر أن الدنيا توقفت وأن قلبك صار يُترجم كلام الله سبحانه مباشرة
#النصر_الخلود