@lukedewolf@OmarchyLinux they just took all my dBiTS and zTTo thru a coordinated attack on the WYSIWYG protocol, via DABAPP3.
All of my fartDawgZ….. just gone.
The 1/1 holoFartDawgDeluxxe.. just wiped
I didn’t listen; 1 tiny misstep. aiming to be better and learn from this
Going offline for a while
@lukedewolf@OmarchyLinux Thank you, soon I hope to become affluent enough to also develop my artistry in assigning undeserved importance around unserious discourses, yknow for posturing, engagement, and simply keeping everyone in the loop on the goings on that *really* matter. Don’t shoot the messenger!
Oh no, what kind of oppressive hoops are they forced to jump through with the new license? Must be something really serious based on what I’ve been seeing😦
Imagine if linux *kernel* made the same change, would be the death of OSS, no? Thank God everyone came to sound the alarm🙏
If they got a multimillion dollar foundation, a strong community, and an invested leader with infinite runway and bandwidth, why is “damn Mac ARM weirddd” and another orgs license change suddenly such a blow in this era of infinite-capability, to the point where an organized sounding of the alarm is all over this site regarding the ONE tiny thing that happened to *not* go massively in their favor, which is… that a minuscule subset of people happen to not really like them/their founder, and a few of them did a petty thing in the OSS space? Like the oldest reoccurring event in comp sci?
Even if asahi did do all that 100% out of spite, who fucking cares..?? Like omarchy has had every circumstance and resource they could possibly desire heavily in their favor since they began; yet somehow I can’t avoid the passionate outcry today over trivial oss shit, and I’m supposed to what, feel bad?
From the outside looking in, am I supposed to feel motivated to contribute organic effort helping them get the *one* thing that didn’t go their way out of millions of other things did? Or help in unleashing retaliation to those responsible?
It’s a fucking opinionated linux bootstrap with gigantic institutional buffers of financial support and a passionate, thriving community, the whole thing could not have gone any better. Just do the Mac ARM stuff yourselves with the sick bleeding-edge agent swarms that are always bragged about being able to utilize unlimitedly?
Or whatever, just be the badass type of crusader most of them seem to present as and just steal whatever you want and give no fucks grinding over the repercussions of license violation with capital power, if the principle behind it is that important?
I just don’t understand crying to the streets about it.
Painful concentrations of hullabaloo.
With respect to that, it’s only fair to accept my valid criticism that the content genre of “CEOs/Politicians doing some absurd action fast and comically exaggerated” is just dogshit to look at, and lies at the absolute floor of low effort expression, which only the most debilitated of the mentally challenged could possibly find “entertaining”, much less insightful or thought provoking.
Just absolute baby shit bro.
Yeah the iteration seems to be the main advantage, but I’d say not exclusively for agents, it’s pretty pleasant in that sense compared to other stacks. Admittedly in the sketchier stuff I’ve seen, it’s less actual collapse and more a reckless piling on of “stuff” that ends up making 3js look less capable/performant than it really is compared to native.
Respect, fwiw, I do “perceive” and very much am aware of the intense range present in the million fold gamut composing whatever it is we all somewhat agreeably consider “observable reality”. Interestingly I am also nearly 1:1 synchronous with every point you made once explained at length,and appreciate your kindness to do so, even in a potential where I was acting in bad faith.
That admittedly could be partly; some parts of prose have a higher focus on certain approaches of appeals, but that is just talk doing its natural purpose and the way things do.
Like the other end of intelligence, imo it feels dumb or performative to refuse to otherwise explain vague prophet-esque 2-word rhetoric, to me distilled claims I can’t see some shit you can.
That’s all, I do second most of what you said though. This was unusual but mostly my earnest curiosity so thanks :)
Hopefully one day you will be able to explain such a concept even to the “most lacking” of laymen in a clear manner, otherwise you only serve to stroke this “highly reasoning and understanding” persona you so desire to cultivate and put forth.
The fortress of “conceptual constitution” you so strongly reside in destroys your ability to share or communicate such concepts effectively, even to “smart people”, so there’s not much that differentiates your responses from “ambiguous ramblings of a madman”, catch my drift?
Your point is just not salient, but you’re acting like it is, and that people of “certain intelligence” would find your sentiment obvious. Is that the goal so I hopefully give up and say “wow this is exceptional thinking that’s beyond me”?
Ah, quite nihilistic I suppose, in that it doesn’t even matter if you explain your safeguards? I can only assume that sentiment based on the sustained ambiguity of this response, that broadly skirts around directly addressing the simple, original “two sides to the one coin” concept of alignment yacine originally expressed.
I would love to meet my soulmate though; “combinatorial explosion” seems almost mythical in that kind of field evaluation besides common instinctual misdirects, assuming it even *is* applicable/tangible in some direct practical sense like you’ve claimed.
Every theoretical “leaning” is essentially a vector that, quite literally, has “an opposite direction” that is much easier to exploit if you understand the original, intended vector in detail; genuinely curious what are you trying to insinuate with “define two”, besides a vague attempt at showboating some implied extra-dimensional nuance you fancy yourself attuned to?
Are you being vague out of ego or ignorance?
Im having a decent time using the webGPU renderer and separating the react side , renderer/3D, and core principles, but I guess its not too conducive to an approach that’s like “actually my agents are the tech lead, isn’t that so cool?”, which is definitely not what am doing; and to do so would take away the exact enjoyment and fulfillment that motivates me to do anything with the project in the first place (I’m very aware of the agent-oriented-thing bias towards 3js, but after a certain complexity I imagine it just collapses, so it makes me think 99% of folks using 3js literally don’t actually try).
I always do 2160x1440 in AE, unless 4k is required, it feels like the perfect middle ground to work relatively fast and not always worry about breaking memory buffers of certain 3rd party effects, and 1440p is good on phones, and a little more graceful about being blown up on a large 4k display if it had to compared to 1080p