As a small community supporter, I’m genuinely happy to see such a detailed reply and your clear insights into the Solid mechanism.
From my original understanding, allocating funds to expand the card treasury should drive real revenue growth, since each card can be traded repeatedly (8–10 times), generating a 20% profit on every transaction.
That’s why I’m still a bit unclear on the strategic purpose behind the originally mentioned “token buyback and burn” approach.
As you pointed out in your reply, the real key is building a product and service that real consumers are willing to keep paying for over time.
Thank you again for taking the time to explain. I truly appreciate the thoughtful response!
@TuomHolmberg Thank you for your reply!
From an ecosystem perspective, allocating profits to strengthen the card treasury is indeed a more capital-efficient approach. That said, I’d like to ask: what positive benefits does this decision deliver to the overall product by increasing the $CARDS token price?
If it cannot create a self-reinforcing positive flywheel, might the short-term price surge simply accelerate the product toward its endpoint?I look forward to hearing your thoughts. Thank you very much!