Requesting the GoI to bring the following amendments to the Atrocities Act so that SC/ST students can feel safer in colleges:
Amendment of Section 3(1):
After clause (zc), insert:
(zd) being a faculty or staff member, causes mental agony to a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe student by catching and/or reporting the SC/ST student for using unfair means in examinations;
(ze) being an examiner or faculty member, awards a failing grade to or fails a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe student in any examination, internal evaluation, or viva-voce, irrespective of the student not performing as per the passing guidelines;
(zf) Any death of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe student, irrespective of it being suicide or unnatural, whether on the college campus or outside, and whether during an active academic session or during college vacations, regardless of the reason (such as relationship breakups, road traffic accidents, family issues, snake bites, rabies, syphilis, HIV, bomb blast or poor academic performance), shall be held against the GC and OBC members of the college administration and faculty for failing to save the life of a disadvantaged person;
irrespective of active act or intent, punishable with imprisonment for life or not less than ten years.
साहिल वकोड़े IIT बॉम्बे के छात्र थे। परीक्षा चल रही थी। पूरा प्रश्नपत्र AI एप्प को अपलोड कर के उत्तर कॉपी में लिख रहे थे। प्रोफेसर ने पकड़ लिया। बाहर ले गए, डाँटा और कहा कि संस्थान के नियम स्पष्ट हैं आप चोरी करते पकड़े गए तो सस्पेंड किए जा सकते हो।
साहिल ने बाद में आत्महत्या कर ली। माँ-बाप ने पोस्टमार्टम के बाद भी शव नहीं लिया क्योंकि उन्हें न्याय चाहिए। न्याय पाने के लिए उन्होंने मोदी एक्ट की धाराएँ लगवा दीं प्रोफेसर पर।
एक लड़का आरक्षण से IIT पहुँचा। कम नंबर न आए, इसलिए चोरी कर रहा था। वह टॉपर बनना चाह रहा था। पर एक मनुवादी शिक्षक ने उसे कॉलेज के कानून बताए, सस्पेंड किया भी नहीं। उसने आत्महत्या कर ली।
क्या एक दलित को फोन ले जाने अनुमति नहीं होनी चाहिए? क्या ऐतिहासिक प्रताड़ना के कारण उसको ओपन मोबाइल परीक्षा देने की अनुमति नहीं होनी चाहिए?
आज एक ब्राइट स्टूडेंट, जो जेट इंजन बना सकता था AI से पूछ कर, हमारे बीच इसलिए नहीं रहा क्योंकि उससे पहले ही चरण में रोक लिया गया। मोदी एक्ट इसीलिए बना ही है।
प्रोफेसर को फाँसी होनी चाहिए।
Sahil, a B Tech student at IIT Bombay, died by suicide after being caught using a phone during an exam. IIT said he uploaded the paper to ChatGPT for answers inside the exam hall.
Police booked the faculty who caught him under the SC/ST Atrocities Act on the complaint of Sahil's father, because why not. If there’s a mechanism to spin the story from "died by suicide out of fear after getting caught cheating" into "died after being forced to cheat because evil faculty relentlessly tormented him for his caste and threatened to fail him," you might as well pull that lever.
Sahil’s father claimed that "under instructions from IIT Director", faculty member Suryanarayan Dulla had been targeting his son with casteist slurs since long, a revelation that apparently only struck him post-tragedy.
Caste-based activist groups and political parties will inevitably exploit this to engineer Rohith Vemula 2.0. We are drifting toward an educational environment where faculty members dare not report academic dishonesty or fail underperforming students, wary that a Atrocities case could be weaponized against them retrospectively.
Wonderful work done by producers of this explainer. MDR is just one more irritant that has been introduced by @narendramodi govt.
Maybe to cut @myogiadityanath to size!
I watched these two videos of Maharaja Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia.
In first video, Maharaj Scindia ji praised Bittu Tabahi for cleaning Ajnar River alone. He said that Bittu did not question MP or MLA or councillor. Instead, Bittu cleaned the whole river himself and showed his capability.
In the second video, a man politely asked Maharaj ji to complete the construction of road or else no one will vote. Maharaj Scindia ji got offended and told him to not talk to him in such language.
Maharaj Scindia ji clearly said in the first video that people should not question MPs and MLAs. If you are not happy with some work of Govt then you should go and do it on your own.
In this case, I request the citizens to complete the construction of the road and then pay toll tax to Govt. This will show everyone the real capability of Indians. After that, CM and MPs and MLAs will mention you in their speeches and probably invite you to their office and give you a shawl if you are lucky. 🥰
Janta bhi matlab ek dum bewakoof hai.
Raja sahab ne election time me khud ko "jan-sevak" aur tumhe "janta-janardan" kya bol diya, tum to khud ko relevant samajh kar accountability maangne lage.
Hadd me raho bhai. Charno me let kar nivedan karna seekho.
This is the stupidest decision by the Modi government to date. Visa & Mastercard will be celebrating in America.
No wonder the seths of Bengal financed Robert Clive in 1757. It’s in our genes to extract defeat from the jaws of victory & help the foreigner.
STCG on Equity was 15%. Now 20%
LTCG on Equity was ZERO. Now 12.5%
MDR proposed on UPI is 0.02% for Capital Markets TODAY 🥹 0.4% for P2M Transactions.
Knowing this Goverment Well, we all Know How This Will Eventually End !!!
#FI
> Bank withdrawal is chargeable.
> ATM withdrawal is chargeable
> Cheque withdrawal is chargeable
> And now UPI is also chargeable.
You have to pay a share of your money for using your own hard earned money because they need to fund some ladli behna and chatori chachi yojna.
"MDR merchant par lag raha hai, consumer safe hai."
Kaunsa merchant consumer nahi hai? Ek kirana dukaandar jab sham ko wholesale mandi se stock khareedta hai, tab woh bhi ek consumer hi hota hai.
"Merchant" koi alag prajati nahi hai, har merchant aage chalkar consumer hi hai.
@dmuthuk You can also discuss its effects on segments where margins are very low, take for example loan repayments. How and why is lender supposed to take this huge cut from its capital not just interest?
Speculation and claims that the MDR will be charged on UPI transactions are completely false, baseless, and misleading.
Such baseless and sensation-creating speculations cause needless uncertainty, fear and suspicion among our citizens.
The Government remains fully committed to promoting digital payments via UPI.
MDR on UPI is a trust issue more than anything else, in 2025 you asked people not to believe rumours that there would be a charge on UPI transactions in 2026 you said okay next month there would be charges on UPI transactions.
People who believed you in 2025 will now won’t believe that this would not extend to the remaining 96% transactions in future.
A percentage-based MDR on UPI completely misses how financial margins work on ground.
Take an NBFC collecting loan repayments: if a customer pays back a ₹50,000 principal via UPI, a 0.4% MDR means losing ₹200 straight from the capital itself.
"Only 4-5% of transactions will be impacted."
Stop hiding real economic value behind volume statistics. That "mere 5%" of transactions above ₹2,000 carries nearly 50% of the total merchant payment value.
Are school fees, medical bills, monthly grocery runs,..
"Only 4-5% of transactions will be impacted."
Stop hiding real economic value behind volume statistics. That "mere 5%" of transactions above ₹2,000 carries nearly 50% of the total merchant payment value.
Are school fees, medical bills, monthly grocery runs,..
"Only 4-5% of transactions will be impacted."
Stop hiding real economic value behind volume statistics. That "mere 5%" of transactions above ₹2,000 carries nearly 50% of the total merchant payment value.
Are school fees, medical bills, monthly grocery runs,..
or loan repayments not part of an ordinary citizen’s life? Punishing legitimate businesses and NBFCs with a 0.4% percentage cut on these tickets means merchants will either add a surcharge or push people right back to cash.