ชล : sorry sorry 😧 some of you is in ramadan right? oops sorry sorry … sorry na
It’s okay. I understand when people are hungry. I don’t want to make them more hungry so let’s just talk ☺️
— ชาล็อตเป็นคนที่เคารพทุกคนมาก น้องเข้าใจว่าเดือนนี้มีแฟนคลับบางท่านถือศีลอด น้องเลยไม่ทานข้าวในไลฟ์เพราะเกรงว่าแฟนคลับบางคนจะเห็นแล้วหิว เป็นสิ่งเล็กน้อยที่ให้เกียรติมาก
#ชาล็อตออสติน #CharlotteAustin
@Daniicristina18 Because I’ve stayed silent for so long, and I still get criticized and mocked even though I never did anything wrong. Don’t I have the right to defend myself?
With respect, I would like to share a different perspective, as I believe your theory contains several points that may not fully reflect the broader context.
First, it is fair to say that Nawat recognized the financial potential that can emerge from chemistry between two artists and saw long-term business value in it. However, stating that all attempts to recreate similar success have failed is not entirely accurate, though it is also not completely incorrect.
The success of any pairing or individual does not rely solely on management, but also on the artists themselves each year. At present, it is clear that the organization has continued to learn and adapt in artist management by diversifying projects and assigning work based on individual strengths. There are artists who have achieved visible success, such as Engfa and Gochabel, as well as others like Snack, who is set to appear in a film and shows promising potential from the teaser. More artists are also being given opportunities to audition and pursue paths that align with their own abilities.
Second, referring to the EngLot fandom—particularly the Smiley group—as the “most stable profit-generating machine” unintentionally diminishes the value of other artists and fandoms. It is also important to recognize that an organization’s work goes far beyond livestream sales or merchandise.
Artists generate income through many channels, including television dramas, series, films, brand endorsements, events, and other commercial projects. Therefore, evaluating success or value based solely on livestream figures does not provide a complete picture.
Third, the idea that Engfa does not take couple work seriously is a misunderstanding. Engfa is a disciplined and highly professional artist who commits fully to every project she undertakes. However, her career is not limited to couple-based work alone. She has consistently balanced solo projects in dramas, films, and endorsements alongside other responsibilities.
Differences in visibility are often the result of scheduling. Engfa manages multiple projects at the same time, while Charlotte may have more availability for certain promotional formats. This naturally results in different patterns of public presence.
If you believe that Charlotte’s fans appear regularly in livestreams, that is your personal opinion, and there is no right or wrong in that. However, the reason Engfa or other artists may not appear frequently in livestream sales is because artists under the organization have diverse and varied schedules, which may differ from one another.
Regarding claims that the organization is attempting to “confine” Charlotte, this remains a matter of personal interpretation. However, reducing an artist’s value to purely transactional terms is unfair to all artists involved. Every artist has their own worth, talent, and opportunities that align with their individual strengths.
Speculation about contract renewals or external agency interest remains personal opinion unless supported by verified information. Without confirmed facts, such assumptions should be approached with caution.
And the current situation is an individual matter and does not involve Engfa. She is not someone who can be controlled or influenced into wrongdoing. Throughout her career, she has consistently demonstrated professionalism, gratitude, and respect toward the organization and her colleagues—qualities that have been repeatedly acknowledged by those who have worked with her. For this reason, suggestions that she may be “next” are, in my view, unfounded.
You are, of course, entitled to your opinions. However, I respectfully ask that Engfa not be drawn into this discussion.
From what I have heard through news reports, the current issues involving Charlotte relate to several matters, such as contacting work opportunities without going through the primary agency, traveling to or attending important events without notifying the organization, as well as certain behavioral issues that have been reported publicly. These statements come from individuals within the organization and may contain both factual elements and possible additions or interpretations that could contribute to conflict, which cannot be independently verified. Nevertheless, as long as a contractual relationship remains in place, the most appropriate course of action is to coordinate professionally with the organization in order to prevent potential issues related to safety, shared interests, and mutual responsibilities.
Finally, I am sharing all of this solely to promote understanding and not to take sides with any particular party. Working in this industry requires professionalism from all involved, including organizations themselves, which should also refrain from discussing internal matters in public.
In this context, I believe that responsibility is shared among all parties, and these issues are not related to other artists or Engfa.
Therefore, I kindly ask that Engfa not be mentioned in this matter.