@StasBekman There’re options with cheaper inter node comms with better scalability, for example: https://t.co/CfKJRG8p3Q - maybe you’ll find it useful!
@SonglinYang4 > Minimax used a very simple linear attention variant
https://t.co/bWZcs5z4AM it looks like they tried gdn as well, but maybe "we did not scale the size" is the reason behind worse perf
@eliebakouch GDN hybrid is fine, Mamba2 < Mamba2 + qknorm ≈ GDN. But all those models are relatively weak in reasoning-intensive benchmarks (like BBH) compared to full-attention.
Meanwhile, for all those experiments, we did not scale the size and observe the downstream preformance.
@zhongwen2009 Curious if any papers explore reweighting the reward with router statistics. For example, we can compute the router entropy for each token and assign higher rewards to decisive tokens with less uniform expert distributions (or something along those lines)
@m_sirovatka i think this is normal, but it depends on the type of CP you’re using. if you’re using something like zig zag attention, then each CP rank would have a chunk from the beginning and the end of the sequence, so input ids are not just cut into 4 equal parts but are also shuffled