@nosilverv And if you ask Claude for reasoning on that? Also curious about its reasoning for Jesus as well. Fuck it why not all, could you please ask it for reasoning behind each featured name being featured and its placement.
@buglepong@HarrisonGarlic1 Not with porn. It is genuinely addictive. The right patterns of light hitting the eyes resembling genitals are just as effective at impacting the nervous system as a chemical interaction.
So this happened to me except not the second part. As long as we were together I was happy, it was that simple. Sometimes the monks and sages are wrong and external circumstances actually are the key to happiness
@Confusionist@NoahTopper Honestly I still don't see what you're getting at. You don't want to live in the world that results from that, yet you assert that potentially something very bad does need preventing.
How does that make sense?
@pixlpa Little big planet with boobs and triangle hand
Cylinderlimb dog laying belly up
Jax Jesus trianglehands
And something from Steven universe maybe or maybe its some Pokemon man idk
@_tedks Its counting micro-deaths, every ppm of co2 is like one little death. So you are dying 875 times a second which is bad but better than dying 2000 times a second. Ideally it should show a negative number.
I am an expert at this, one time i
ALL powerful doesn't mean able to violate logical coherence.
Stop thinking of God as something like Zeus and instead think God = your scientific model of the universe, just with an assumption of mindlike/personal nature to it, and a lot will make more sense.
There are valid ways to critcize belief, but this is not one of them. You are standing in a forest, complaining that you see only a bunch of trees but no proof of a forest.
@Confusionist@NoahTopper So is said, yet the act of naming those specific reasons is absent from conversations on this. So, go ahead and name them please, explain.
"an...god" this is why you don't believe. When you understand god you understand its *logically incoherent* for there to be more than one. Its like saying "an everything"-there is only one everything. Faith in God is faith that there is a coherency to reality at a minimum, and in many cases - and I think what leads to this common misconception - extends to a belief in god as having being-like qualities, mind-like qualities. There are many ways to conceptualize those qualities and traditions of what exact qualities "should" be believed in, which gets misunderstood as if it were many competing gods. Its not. Its many competing ideas for who and what God is like. Sub in "mind-like qualities of the totality of all being" for "God" and you may find a lot of statements about God a lot more respectable.