@tonista_ Noored on bränditeadlikud. Arvestades, et majanduspoliitikas on laual: sotsid, REsotsid, Isotsid, KEsotsid ja EKREsotsid, siis miks mitte juba tõesti originaali valida? Adidas vs Adibass vs ...
(PP on *pisut* erinev, aga seni ka selles mitte väga veenev)
@AndrewPerpetua Why don't we just buy up all the jet engines from China? Chinese sell to the highest bidder, they don't give a s%it about Russian "allies" once money is on the table.
@mbohnert@BurggrabenH - Raising fuel prices to balancing levels would either unleash HUGE inflation wave or cause CBR to raise interest rates to 20% range at least - non-military economy would outright collapse. Both are unpleasant outcomes.
@mbohnert@BurggrabenH Market prices would be the most logical solution to find balance. However, there are two particular issues:
- Logistics. Russian oil and fuel logistics are based on pipelines - efficient but rigid. That is also broken to an unknown extent (was not the case in the end of USSR).
@JayinKyiv Good point! The last time RU bond yield was at the same level (end of 2024), central bank interest rate was at 21% (or +5% of bond yield). Now it's 14.25% or (-2.5% of bond yield). Should be free money for banks to borrow from CB and buy bonds. But no...
@DarioCpx That said, I wouldn't completely exclude the possibility that oil market was also heavily manipulated *before* SoH crisis began and the real demand was/is way lower than what's been recorded. If that's the case, then flip to contango would not be outrageous.
@BlackLabelAdvsr I honestly don't understand posts like this one. Well, US is much richer these days and Europe does have plenty of problems, mostly own goals. But how does it hurt your a**? Be happy and celebrate!
@DarioCpx What do you think of the bond yields behavior? UK and EZ yields down heavily (30-40 bp) from the top, while US and Japan basically stay at the top (down 10 bp or even less).
@MrMatthewTodd It seems climate change is one of the many unpleasant phenomena we simply cannot do anything serious about. At least with the current technology. Then again, climate cooling would be way worse. Relax, adapt and develop new technologies.
@JavierBlas All tankers loaded before Feb 28 and floating storage should be discharged by now. Physical shortage should manifest itself already..
Anyways, if the physical shortage will *not* appear in May, it will likely not appear at all. Oil prices could CRASH in June.
@JavierBlas Some things don't seem to add up. 13 mbd supply cut and prices around $100. How?
- Marginal demand has *already* disappeared (but where? China?)
- Supply was previously (much) larger than official data
- Supply from Gulf is today larger than official data
@viljararakas Eriti bitch on liitintress siis, kui ka intressi*määr* samal ajal tõuseb. Seda trendi võib väärata ainult globaalne kriis, mis on teistpidi pisut jama.
Rääkimata maksumaksjate/ülalpeetavate suhtarvu tõusust, mis on samuti kasvav ja kiirenev.
Riigivõla "optimum" on NULL.
@viljararakas Meil on sellest aastast üldine maksuvaba tulu määr, hinnaga ~750 milj €, mida finantseeritakse *täielikult* võlaga. Aastane täiendav intressikulu ~30 milj €, mida finantseeritakse *samuti* uue võlaga. 2027 maksab see 780 m €, 2028 juba 812 m € jne. Liitintress on bitch.
@OilCfd Roughly 11-12 mbd missing? Sounds logical. When is it going to really bite? GFC took 3 (!) mbd off demand. Where has the price to go to balance out 11 mbd of demand? And what'll be left of the global economy?
What's the source of this data?
@energy_blogger It took GFC to cut global demand by 3 bpd. Covid lockdowns cut by 26 bpd. Cutting demand by 10 bpd without lockdowns would take pretty serious economic crisis.