@Nishiko_khaos Ese publicación es claramente engagement bait. Esa persona con opiniones tan deplorables solo quiere sacar unos dolaritos de más por hacer enojar gente, irónico que su publicación trata de lo ricos que supuestamente son los gringos como el :)
Growing up hearing “Wikipedia isn't a valid source” and then entering a workplace where people say “just ask ChatGPT” is a surprisingly strange timeline
@gabosalazar21 ¿El sistema de propulsion está compuesto por motores sin escobilla de corriente directa? ¿O por hubmotors construidos dentro de las llantas? Para un vehículo con potencia de 13.5 kW y de esas dimensiones parece que la velocidad de 50km/h es una limitante importante
This doesn’t even make sense. What a simplistic view. You can condemn sacrifice without turning Indigenous civilizations into cartoon villains.
The “Aztecs were barbaric so conquest was good” argument always collapses the second you apply the same standard evenly. Human sacrifice existed in Mesoamerica. It should be talked about honestly.
But Europeans arrived from a world of inquisitions, mass burnings, public torture, dynastic slaughter, religious wars, colonial extraction, and industrial-scale conquest. The idea that one side represented “civilization” and the other represented “savagery” is mostly hindsight propaganda. Guess the propaganda got to you.
Also, the “Bronze Age” framing barely works here. Makes me question your understanding of the Americas. Mesoamerican societies developed under completely different environmental and material conditions. They had no large draft animals and simply different metallurgy priorities. Different trade systems. Yet they still built massive cities, hydraulic engineering, aqueduct’s, astronomy, mathematics, calendars, causeways, market systems, and state networks that stunned Europeans on contact.
You don’t have to romanticize the Aztecs to admit the “primitive savage rescued by Europe” framing is historically shallow.