Aaron Siri

Author of Vaccines, Amen ( and Managing Partner of national law firm Siri & Glimstad LLP ( 100+professionals.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Mandates are the tool of bullies, criminals and dictators. If a patient refuses a medical product after being conveyed its benefits and risks, then that is called informed consent. They were informed and did not consent. Mandating over this objection is immoral and illiberal.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

The FDA has a monopoly within healthcare and for something to become the standard of care it requires an enormous amount of money and resources which only large pharmaceutical companies or well-funded biotech firms can realistically afford.
@SabinehazanMD

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Dr. @SabinehazanMD , a gastroenterologist, explores the critical role of gut health, not losing any of her thousands of COVID patients, the science behind fecal transplants, and the connection between bifidobacteria and mental health.

(00:00) Introduction to Dr. Sabine Hazan

(01:31) The Science of Fecal Transplants

(05:47) Understanding the Microbiome

(13:21) Environmental Microbes and Immunity

(23:54) The Gut Battle: Good vs. Bad Bacteria

(26:20) Bifidobacteria: The Key Microbe

(29:47) Bifidobacteria and Autism

(42:07) FDA Regulations and Research Challenges

(45:49) The Impact of Modernity on Microbiome Health

(51:24) Methylene Blue Effects on Bifidobacteria

(1:01:02) During COVID, “No One Died on My Shift”

(1:07:32) Bad Protocols During COVID

(1:18:29) Addressing the Crisis in Children’s Health

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Yesterday’s Supreme Court decision reflects that the capture of government by big industry is nearly complete. It affirmed the right of chemical companies to injure, maim, and even kill you and your children with their pesticides, herbicides, etc., with near complete impunity.

This means you can expect increasingly toxic pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, etc., because the more toxic they are, the better they will kill weeds, pests, etc. And farmers that then use the most effective products, no matter how harmful to humans, will have a competitive advantage. The result will be that the farmer who adopts the most effective products (meaning most toxic) will have the largest crop yield. Other farmers, to compete, will then also be forced to adopt the more harmful product. With that, the race to the bottom has begun.

I expect that in the coming decades we will look back and wish to return to the “safer days” of glyphosate. So, bottom line: your government has abandoned you and your children. Think about this decision: 7 out of 9 Supreme Court judges sided with the chemical company against the public, and Trump’s DOJ intervened in the case on the side of the chemical company. Anyone who thinks this administration cares about you over industry profit is, at this point, delusional.

Shame on the DOJ, shame on the Trump admin, and shame on the Supreme Court for letting chemical companies get away with injuring, maiming, and killing Americans with their products instead of just allowing normal market forces to protect us and our children. Now, in addition to vaccines, we can add pesticides, etc., to the list of products that can injure and kill with near complete immunity.

Below is the decision and, in a nutshell, it holds that failure to warn claims brought under state law (which is the primary type of claim one would bring for harms from a pesticide, herbicide, etc.) are preempted by the EPA-approved label such that, if the harm is not on the label, your claim loses (since EPA didn’t add it to the label as a harm), and if the harm is on the label, your claim loses (since it has been disclosed on the label). Meaning heads or tail they win, and you and your children lose.

https://t.co/KGl3RCQqTt

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Dr. @SabinehazanMD explains how she helped two nonverbal autistic twins regain speech.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Dr. @SabinehazanMD , a gastroenterologist, explores the critical role of gut health, not losing any of her thousands of COVID patients, the science behind fecal transplants, and the connection between bifidobacteria and mental health.

(00:00) Introduction to Dr. Sabine Hazan

(01:31) The Science of Fecal Transplants

(05:47) Understanding the Microbiome

(13:21) Environmental Microbes and Immunity

(23:54) The Gut Battle: Good vs. Bad Bacteria

(26:20) Bifidobacteria: The Key Microbe

(29:47) Bifidobacteria and Autism

(42:07) FDA Regulations and Research Challenges

(45:49) The Impact of Modernity on Microbiome Health

(51:24) Methylene Blue Effects on Bifidobacteria

(1:01:02) During COVID, “No One Died on My Shift”

(1:07:32) Bad Protocols During COVID

(1:18:29) Addressing the Crisis in Children’s Health

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Military reverses course and again mandates flu shots for most military and civilian personnel.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Dr. @SabinehazanMD , a gastroenterologist, explores the critical role of gut health, not losing any of her thousands of COVID patients, the science behind fecal transplants, and the connection between bifidobacteria and mental health.

(00:00) Introduction to Dr. Sabine Hazan

(01:31) The Science of Fecal Transplants

(05:47) Understanding the Microbiome

(13:21) Environmental Microbes and Immunity

(23:54) The Gut Battle: Good vs. Bad Bacteria

(26:20) Bifidobacteria: The Key Microbe

(29:47) Bifidobacteria and Autism

(42:07) FDA Regulations and Research Challenges

(45:49) The Impact of Modernity on Microbiome Health

(51:24) Methylene Blue Effects on Bifidobacteria

(1:01:02) During COVID, “No One Died on My Shift”

(1:07:32) Bad Protocols During COVID

(1:18:29) Addressing the Crisis in Children’s Health

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

While fighting to assure the vaccine injured are left destitute, the DOJ rushes to defend Moderna's profits: "The U.S. Department of Justice has told the Federal Circuit that multibillion-dollar patent infringement litigation should be directed at the government, instead of Moderna, for the drugmaker's development and supply of COVID vaccines during the pandemic."  https://t.co/WfODhUVrfE

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

If more doctors spoke their truth without fear of controversy or losing their jobs, we would see a shift in the national conversation.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

A pediatrician with 10 years of experience shares his experience practicing in California, the outcomes among his vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, issuing medical exemptions, and why physicians fear sharing the outcome among their vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
@DrJoelGator

(00:00) Introducing Dr. Joel Warsh

(03:27) Unvaccinated vs. Vaccinated Children

(05:55) Health Outcomes of the Unvaccinated

(14:56) The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Vaccination

(17:41) Censorship and Speaking Out

(20:50) Real-Life Stories: Medical Exemptions and Their Implications

(24:42) Challenges in Medical Exemptions and Parental Rights

(33:45) The Explosion of Chronic Health Conditions

(39:24) Who is Most likely Not to Vaccinate

(49:58) Reclaiming the Label Antivaxxer

(57:51) The Argument Around Mandates

(1:06:52) The Challenge of Vaccine Studies

(1:10:27) The Rise of Vaccine-Injured Parents

(1:12:22) The Role of Informed Consent in Vaccination

(1:22:59) Trusting Primary Sources for Vaccine Information

(1:30:24) The Courage to Speak Out Against Medical Norms

(1:32:28) Hope for Change in Vaccine Policy

[Secretary Kennedy @SecKennedy]

America faces more than a chronic disease epidemic that threatens our physical health. We also face a spiritual malaise that undermines our mental health.

Our children are increasingly isolated, fragmented, and anxious, spending more than 8.5 hours a day on screens.

This summer, put down the phone and reconnect with nature, family, and community. It's time to Take Back Your Health. Eat Real Food. Get Active. Together, we will Make America Healthy Again.

[DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard]

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.

https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4

[Secretary Kennedy @SecKennedy]

The claim that CDC has already spent $1.24 billion on COVID-19 vaccines is simply wrong.

The contracts cited are indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts put in place ahead of the season to ensure availability if needed.

HHS and CDC have not purchased COVID-19 vaccines for the upcoming respiratory season and have made no decisions regarding future purchases.

IDIQ contracts allowing future orders are not the same as spending taxpayer dollars.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

“How many other doctors would you say in the LA area also have more than an insignificant number of unvaccinated kids in their practice?”
@DrJoelGator

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

A pediatrician with 10 years of experience shares his experience practicing in California, the outcomes among his vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, issuing medical exemptions, and why physicians fear sharing the outcome among their vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
@DrJoelGator

(00:00) Introducing Dr. Joel Warsh

(03:27) Unvaccinated vs. Vaccinated Children

(05:55) Health Outcomes of the Unvaccinated

(14:56) The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Vaccination

(17:41) Censorship and Speaking Out

(20:50) Real-Life Stories: Medical Exemptions and Their Implications

(24:42) Challenges in Medical Exemptions and Parental Rights

(33:45) The Explosion of Chronic Health Conditions

(39:24) Who is Most likely Not to Vaccinate

(49:58) Reclaiming the Label Antivaxxer

(57:51) The Argument Around Mandates

(1:06:52) The Challenge of Vaccine Studies

(1:10:27) The Rise of Vaccine-Injured Parents

(1:12:22) The Role of Informed Consent in Vaccination

(1:22:59) Trusting Primary Sources for Vaccine Information

(1:30:24) The Courage to Speak Out Against Medical Norms

(1:32:28) Hope for Change in Vaccine Policy

[The HighWire @HighWireTalk]

A study analyzing 2,605 VAERS reports found that 78% of infant deaths occurred within 7 days of vaccination. The journal that published it just retracted it, and the author says all eight objections came from a single person, he answered every one of them, and the journal stopped responding.

@SecKennedy is now demanding answers from the editor-in-chief of Toxicology Reports, including the full internal analysis behind the retraction decision, the names of experts consulted and any conflicts of interest, and an explanation of why the journal chose full removal over a retraction with an expression of concern.

The author isn't the only one. Epidemiologist @NicHulscher says his MMR study finding hundreds of sudden infant deaths shortly after vaccination was also deleted from the same journal.

Full article by @smiddendorp22 linked below 👇

https://t.co/UROFoJcThw

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

“What is the differential between the vaccinated and unvaccinated kids, as you've seen over the last 10 years in your practice?”

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

A pediatrician with 10 years of experience shares his experience practicing in California, the outcomes among his vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, issuing medical exemptions, and why physicians fear sharing the outcome among their vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
@DrJoelGator

(00:00) Introducing Dr. Joel Warsh

(03:27) Unvaccinated vs. Vaccinated Children

(05:55) Health Outcomes of the Unvaccinated

(14:56) The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Vaccination

(17:41) Censorship and Speaking Out

(20:50) Real-Life Stories: Medical Exemptions and Their Implications

(24:42) Challenges in Medical Exemptions and Parental Rights

(33:45) The Explosion of Chronic Health Conditions

(39:24) Who is Most likely Not to Vaccinate

(49:58) Reclaiming the Label Antivaxxer

(57:51) The Argument Around Mandates

(1:06:52) The Challenge of Vaccine Studies

(1:10:27) The Rise of Vaccine-Injured Parents

(1:12:22) The Role of Informed Consent in Vaccination

(1:22:59) Trusting Primary Sources for Vaccine Information

(1:30:24) The Courage to Speak Out Against Medical Norms

(1:32:28) Hope for Change in Vaccine Policy

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

A pediatrician with 10 years of experience shares his experience practicing in California, the outcomes among his vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, issuing medical exemptions, and why physicians fear sharing the outcome among their vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
@DrJoelGator

(00:00) Introducing Dr. Joel Warsh

(03:27) Unvaccinated vs. Vaccinated Children

(05:55) Health Outcomes of the Unvaccinated

(14:56) The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Vaccination

(17:41) Censorship and Speaking Out

(20:50) Real-Life Stories: Medical Exemptions and Their Implications

(24:42) Challenges in Medical Exemptions and Parental Rights

(33:45) The Explosion of Chronic Health Conditions

(39:24) Who is Most likely Not to Vaccinate

(49:58) Reclaiming the Label Antivaxxer

(57:51) The Argument Around Mandates

(1:06:52) The Challenge of Vaccine Studies

(1:10:27) The Rise of Vaccine-Injured Parents

(1:12:22) The Role of Informed Consent in Vaccination

(1:22:59) Trusting Primary Sources for Vaccine Information

(1:30:24) The Courage to Speak Out Against Medical Norms

(1:32:28) Hope for Change in Vaccine Policy

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Conduct of the @realDonaldTrump admin reflects it does not care about the vaccine injured. The DOJ continues to vigorously fight us in federal court to defend the blatantly unconstitutional “compensation” program for the Covid-19 vaccine injured (CICP), which has almost no funds, no process, and systematically denies almost all claims, while at the same time, our government plans to hand out $1.5 billion to Pfizer/Moderna. Shameful.

DOJ brief: https://t.co/BLjOEHdXfh

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

A great conversation with @DrJoelGator on his 10 years of pediatric experience, including the outcomes among his vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, what other pediatricians say behind closed doors, and issuing medical exemptions.
Episode drops tomorrow!

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Below is the letter we just sent on behalf of @ICANdecide, @React19org and others to current CDC Acting Director, @DrJBhattacharya, regarding $1.5 billion contracts for Covid-19 vaccines. I am confident Dr. Bhattacharya and @SecKennedy would prefer to direct these funds toward treating and compensating the vaccine injured. I hope the White House will let that happen. As a country, we should take care of those harmed before we rush forward harming others.

Here is the text of the letter (with link to the original below):

Dear Dr. Bhattacharya,

We write on behalf of ICAN, React19, and numerous others to express our deep concern and disappointment that CDC has agreed to purchase $1.55 billion worth of pediatric and adult Covid-19 vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and to raise serious concern regarding a potential violation of federal law.[1]

For the millions of Americans harmed by these products, this decision is deeply painful. Rather than directing resources towards treating those whose lives have been devastated, CDC has chosen to further enrich Pfizer and Moderna. The vaccine-injured deserve acknowledgement and care—not abandonment. The tens of thousands of individuals with serious injuries who have contacted our firm alone, and the over 40,000 members of just one group, React19,[2] with serious injuries represent real people whose suffering demands recognition. To allocate more than a billion and a half tax dollars to Pfizer and Moderna while offering those injured by their products nothing is a profound betrayal.

We struggle to comprehend how CDC’s current leadership can continue to disregard, among others, the following established facts:

•CDC fought in court for over 2 years to prevent public disclosure of data which showed that over 7% of the 10 million V-safe users reported needing medical care after a Covid vaccine, on average 2 to 3 times each, with over 70% of those medical encounters resulting in hospitalization, emergency room visits, or urgent care.[3]

•The fact that FDA fought for years to hide data, recently released, showing that when FDA adequately conducted empirical Bayesian analysis internally, it revealed significant safety signals that were hidden from the public.[4]

•In the clinical trial for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, there were 21 deaths in the vaccinated group and 17 deaths in the placebo group—meaning more deaths occurred in the vaccinated group—during the same time period, and where the placebo group contained more participants than the vaccinated group.[5]

•Those seriously injured by this product have been left without recourse because pharmaceutical companies have been granted complete immunity under the PREP Act, while the Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP) remains woefully underfunded and structurally designed to deny compensation (only 0.39% [56 of 14,152] of COVID-related CICP claims have been compensated, with an average payout, excluding three outliers, of a miserly $5,052.57 per claimant)[6]—leaving the injured with nowhere to turn.

•Five years after assuring the world these products are safe, the manufacturers still require PREP Act immunity for the very harms they claim will not occur—an obvious contradiction that requires suspending reality and reason to believe.

Until PREP Act immunity is lifted and the full scope of harm is properly accounted for, the CDC should not direct over a billion and a half dollars to Pfizer and Moderna. These funds should instead be used to treat and compensate those who have already been seriously harmed—the people who have been waiting far too long for help. The people who the CDC assured this product was safe.

CDC should cancel these contracts on the basis that it would be the moral, ethical, and compassionate thing to do. But if it won’t do so on those bases then, in order to confirm these contracts do not violate federal law, and to avoid litigation, please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts with Pfizer and Moderna were not in any manner related to the Vaccines for Children Program (VFC), and that absent Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) approval, they will not be part of this program.

As you are no doubt aware, absent approval from ACIP, the vaccines procured from Pfizer and Moderna pursuant to these contracts cannot be procured, distributed, or administered through the VFC, and any such conduct would be a clear violation of federal law.[7] As provided in Section 1928 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396s), the VFC mandates that only vaccines recommended by ACIP may be provided under the VFC. Specifically, 42 U.S.C. § 1396s(e) requires the Secretary to use “the list established (and periodically reviewed and as appropriate revised) by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.”

Accordingly, unless and until ACIP affirmatively recommends these Covid-19 vaccines for the applicable pediatric populations, any distribution or administration of the vaccines procured under these contracts through the VFC would constitute a violation of Section 1928 and its implementing regulations.

Please confirm forthwith that the procurement contracts have been cancelled and that the funds will be reallocated to assist the vaccine injured. We hope, given your prior statements regarding these products, that you will take this approach. But if the moral and humane approach is not taken, at the very least please confirm forthwith that these procurement contracts are entirely unrelated to the VFC.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Aaron Siri

Here is a link to the full letter: https://t.co/YDJRUMZi2F

[Secretary Kennedy @SecKennedy]

I sent this letter to the Editor-in-Chief of Toxicology Reports demanding a full explanation for the removal of a published article examining vaccines and sudden infant death.

Americans have a right to know why scientific papers are removed, who made those decisions, what evidence supported them, and whether the same standards are applied consistently.

We will restore trust in public health by insisting on transparency, accountability, and open scientific inquiry—not by asking the public to accept decisions behind closed doors.