Incorruptible Finance is now real-time.
Introducing the Atlas upgrade for the ZK Stack:
✦ 15K+ TPS sequencer
✦ 1-second ZK finality via Airbender
✦ $0.0001 proving cost per transfer
Every time you:
- Pay with a credit card (Diners Club, NYC, 1950)
- Trade electronically (NASDAQ, 1971)
- Hedge risk (CME, 1973)
- Use regulated stablecoins (USDC, 2018)
- Buy crypto ETFs (SEC, 2024)
You should thank American innovation.
Happy 4th of July, America 🇺🇸
Announcing $100M in new fundraising, bringing the total raised to $155M.
With Celestia underneath ✨, developers can deploy high-throughput, unstoppable applications with full-stack customizability.
https://t.co/gOdTLqV353
انتشار بازی مورد انتظار @playoffthegrid نشان خواهد داد که چرا بسیاری از اپلیکیشنهای مصرفکننده به مقیاسپذیری و قابلیت اطمینان لایه یک Avalanche خود نیاز دا��ند. 💥
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."