Abby N

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@AislingDewitt @MattFinnFNC I don't trust Erika. That's just my personal opinion. I don't trust people who habitually lie. People who lie as much as she has have something to hide.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@AislingDewitt @MattFinnFNC The prosecution wouldn't need to request an extension bc they took their time. The defense asked for one once & it was granted, hence why I said this hearing was supposed to be in May, not July, but that still wasn't enough time for them to go over all the evidence.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@lmtobias I couldn't agree more. @chicksonright said this to me for having an opposing opinion. Then they blocked me before I could say what you said in this post.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@AislingDewitt @MattFinnFNC Yes, they do take that into account, but the legal system isn't perfect. Yes, the current judge did. The defense didn’t ask for another extension when the July deadline arrived bc this hearing was supposed to take place in May. Instead, they did what I said in the previous post.

[KENNY KO @KENNYKANCELLED]

Erika Kirk isn’t innocent

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@AislingDewitt @MattFinnFNC No, I believe the defense opted to fight the admissibility/public viewing of the evidence rather than request a delay. Also, Erika demanded a speedy trial.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@AislingDewitt @MattFinnFNC Not Erika specifically, but the prosecution. I just know that they're not required to hand over evidence until the legal deadline. I think with how she's been moving, though, anything's possible.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@AislingDewitt @MattFinnFNC CK’s autopsy report was finalized in Sept. 2025; it was held back from the defense until Nov., and the crime scene pics were not handed over until Mar. 2026.

[Zara Quinn @_Zaraquin]

Erika Kirk's short list of a few lies:
Lied about being with her mother & collapsing in a parking lot after hearing about Charlie being shot.
Lied about not dating for 5 years before Charlie.
Lied about playing college basketball for 2 years, it was 1 year.
Lied about a witch putting a curse on Charlie & him being scared of it.
Lied about Charlie's steel neck.
Lied about Charlie's messages that he was going to be killed.
Sent fake photos as an alibi for 8th September.
Lied that she arrived home at 5:24 on the 8th & made dinner for Charlie.
Lied about waking Charlie up on the 9th for an interview, he was at the office.
Erika & Justin lied to Candace face about Pierre Falcone & his mega donation.
Lied about someone random entering her in a beauty competition, she was competing in pageants for years.
Lied Charlie's book was finished in July, he said he was working on it in Aug.
Lied about going to China to help trafficking victims, she was with her bf.
Lied about her education at ASU.
Lied about her education at Liberty University.
Lied about which plane Andrew Kolvet was on.
Lied about what time she found out that Charlie was dead.
Cancelled the "Doge style" Audit that Charlie ordered just before his death.
Lied about reading the Bible "cover to cover in 2008": also says 2016
Never seen communicating with Charlie's parents & family.
People that have nothing to hide, hide nothing
RIP Charlie, sorry you were betrayed

[Vivian Kubrick @ViKu1111]

Andrew

Let me offer advice.

Experienced investigators pay close attention not only to what a person says, but to what they avoid, what provokes disproportionate anger, and where they repeatedly try to redirect attention.

When someone confronted with factual questions responds by attacking the questioner’s character, motives, sanity and reputation, that behavior does not make the questions disappear. It makes investigators more interested in why those questions produce such an extreme reaction.

Your response is not the language of a man calmly confident that the evidence supports him. It is the language of someone desperate to control the frame: Charlie’s death must be discussed only on your terms, Tyler Robinson must be accepted as the killer, alternative explanations must be ridiculed rather than examined, and anyone who refuses to comply must be publicly destroyed.

That is not a rebuttal. It is containment.

Candace has been conducting what every genuine investigation requires: collecting testimony, crowdsourcing information, following leads, testing theories and discarding those that fail. Some leads will inevitably reach dead ends. That is not proof of dishonesty; it is the nature of investigation. What matters is whether substantial questions remain unanswered—and they do.

Yet instead of answering those questions with evidence, you substitute moral outrage, mockery and character assassination. You invoke Charlie, Erika and the children as emotional shields, as though grief grants you exclusive authority over the facts or makes scrutiny immoral. It does not.

You claim Candace lacks proof while demanding that everyone accept Tyler Robinson’s guilt despite evidence that remains weak, contested and inconclusive. You therefore apply one standard to Candace and another to the official narrative: absolute proof is required before she may ask questions, but certainty is demanded from the public before the case itself has established it.

That contradiction is becoming impossible to miss.

So here is the advice an experienced interrogator might give you: stop attacking the person asking the questions and start answering the questions themselves. Stop repeating certainty where certainty has not been earned. Stop behaving as though investigation is a threat.

Because every time you respond to evidence with sarcasm or moral outrage, to questions with insults, and to uncertainty with enforced certainty, you do not make Candace look less credible.

You make yourself look more concerned about where the investigation may lead.

@RealCandaceO @baroncoleman @JohnMappin @ImMappin @joekent16jan19 @TRobinsonNewEra @LionelMedia @IanCarrollShow @AwakenWithJP @jimmy_dore @OwenBenjamin @leahfiles @realstewpeters @EstulinVz @RealAlexJones @HarrisonHSmith
@BlakeSNeff @TPUSA @DonaldJTrumpJr
#TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #TPUSA #Israel

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Science has no place in a discussion about men made of steel and grieving widows.

In fact, it’s demonic!

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@BlakeSNeff @JustTheTweets17 Two things. You didn't deny it, and how is she a “sick person?” She didn't say anything other than she thought it was strange.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

No, @AndrewKolvet—that would be you. The debilitating narcissism it took to believe that you could hijack Charlie’s legacy—his show, his organization, and pervert his vision. You lied about what he believed in, who his friends were, and what and who he feared in the last days of his life. You shamelessly sold replicas of the T-shirt that he bled out in with profits directed to the LLC that you own a stake in. Not “for Charlie”— but for you, Judas.
You displayed the tent he died under, and partnered with the very people he HATED all for money. You presented a grieving widow as an excuse but forgot to instruct her to actually grieve. You hoped the people wouldn’t notice.
You all thought you could pull it off. You had Kash Patel, the DOJ, the President, the White House Administration, Journalists, and the Vegas mafia on speed dial.
You naturally thought you guys were too big to fail but you forgot what made Charlie great and how he won. Charlie never thought he was above the people or his employees. He always debated and never relied on his Rolodex. You coronated Erika like it was her birthright and sneered at people for asking common sense questions. You forgot that it was Charlie’s ability to communicate and listen to people from different walks of life that made him unique.
In the process you crashed and burned the organization he built. But Charlie was always bigger than Turning Point USA. He has changed the world despite what you’ve done. Let TPUSA lay in the ashes of your deceit. The world knows he was betrayed.
The spirit of what Charlie built lives on with the people who are fighting for real justice.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@chicksonright If it was an inside job, they're obvi going to need to make it look like an outside job, so they'll need a fall guy. They'll need multiple ppl in maroon to use that as “evidence” to place the fall guy wherever they want. Explain TR’s face being unrecognizable in everything.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@realhonestash @ChelsyFreedom I don't think that's an employee. He has the red shirt and white hat they give you to wear if you're a student member of the club who helped out during the event. I have the same ones.

[Shyan Curran @shyancurran]

Common sense. Why do they badly want you to believe it was Tyler Robinson who killed Charlie? Why are they currently running a mass PR campaign painting Erika Kirk as a saint? Why not let the evidence speak for itself?

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@LionelMedia @RealCandaceO I say this all the time 👏🏼

[🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 @LionelMedia]

If @RealCandaceO were truly insane, nobody would give her the time of day. Instead, they scream at everything she says because they believe it matters. The louder the outrage, the greater the attention. Perhaps the Streisand Effect is due for a makeover. Meet the Owens Effect.

[Abby N @AbbyNeaverth]

@willcain Why take the picture and use it as evidence if there's a glare over the important part?