ఒకవేళ 2029లో జగన్ గెలిస్తే..
1. ఇష్టం వచ్చినట్టు పన్నులు వేస్తాడు..మీరు కట్టను అంటే రప్పా రప్పా
2. కుంటి సాకులు చూపి పెన్షన్లు పీకుతాడు.. అ��ిగితే రప్పా రప్పా
3. సొంత కులానికే అన్ని పదవులు ఇస్తాడు.. ప్రశ్నించారో మిగతా కులాలు రప్పా రప్పా
4. మూడు కాదు ముప్పై రాజధానులు అంటాడు.. ఇదేమిటి అన్నారో రప్పా రప్పా
5. చంద్రబాబు కట్టిన పోలవరం కూల్చేస్తాను అంటాడు.. ఎందుకు అని అడిగితే రప్పా రప్పా..
6. ఇంకో 10 లక్షల కోట్లు అప్పులు తెస్తాడు.. వడ్డీ మీ నెత్తిన రప్పా రప్పా..
7. మీ పాస్ బుక్ లో ఆయన ఫోటో, మీ పొలంలో ఆయన బొమ్మ వేసుకుంటాడు.. ఎదురు తిరిగితే రప్పా రప్పా
ఎవడైనా నోరు ఎత్తితే రప్పా రప్పా..
It is truly disheartening to witness how, year after year, the atheist LDF govt’s apathy has resulted in avoidable hardship for lakhs of Ayyappa devotees.
Pilgrims from across the nation are being put through immense difficulty due to the LDF govt’s poor preparation and mismanagement. On one hand, essential services for devotees remain inadequate; on the other, it is deeply troubling to learn that organisations such as the Ayyappa Seva Sangham, the Amritanandamayi Math, and the Subramanya Religious Trust have reportedly been restricted from offering their voluntary support.
Sabarimala is not merely a pilgrimage site; it is a spiritual anchor for millions in our country. The least a government can do is uphold its responsibility with sincerity and respect.
విశాఖ ఉక్కు ఫ్యాక్టరీని కష్టాల నుండి, నష్టాల నుండి గట్టెక్కించాలనే తపనతో CBNగారు మాట్లాడిన మాటల్ని జగన్ వక్రీకరించి ప్రచారం చేయిస్తున్నాడు. దేశంలో ఏ పబ్లిక్ సెక్టార్ కు కూడా రాష్ట్రం ఆర్థిక సాయం చేయలేదు కూటమి ప్రభుత్వం నీరు,విద్యుత్,పన్నులు ఇతరత్రా రూపంలో 2,600 కోట్లు ఇచ్చింది.
My concern is the easy access illegal immigrants get to SIM cards, Aadhaar, & India Stack; all built with honest taxpayers’ money.
Such individuals should be moved to detention centers & processed lawfully, while the local networks enabling them must be documented, & monitored.
If you want to write something about a place /person you need to do some research by visiting that place. Not by posting a year and half old video.
That will be called stale news or attention seeking news.
@naralokesh@Anitha_TDP@APPOLICE100
This person is spreading fake news
@MNageswarRaoIPS Disgusting !
Hindu Mandirs collection is utilised for secular work, not to utilise for Hindu causes.
Tax payers money, mainly from Hindus, are being utilised for brotherhood purposes.
This is India's Secularism !
ఒంగోలు రిజిస్ట్రార్ ఆఫీసులో ACB రైడ్ జరిగితే, సింగరాయకొండ రిజిస్ట్రార్ ఆఫీసు మానేయడం ఏంటి🤔🤔
గత 50 సంవత్సరాలుగా వంశపారంపర్యంగా మా స్వాధీనంలో ఉన్న వ్యవసాయ భూమి ఉన్నపళంగా ఇనాం భూమిగా మార్చడం ఏంటి🤔
అసలు ఏం జరుగుతోంది సార్ @SatyaAnagani@ncbn@naralokesh@OfficeOfAnagani
Was watching some video online by Sringeri Shankaracharya Shri Vidhushekhara Bharati Swami.
He was addressing a Sastra Sabha and explaining the uniqueness of Shastrartha or Shastra model of debate etc.
He said that Shastra is unique because of Purvapaksha tradition. Where you spend time understanding the opponent and how even a Nastika Charvaka is given a seat at the table to voice an opinion. He also qualifies that not anyone is qualified to voice opinion and even to do that needs serious study etc.
Later he gives an example that opinions are many and tattvam or final conclusion need not to be so. Just because opinions are many and that they are being allowed to voice doesn't mean that there is no conclusive truth.
He gives a quirky example. If someone asks 'Where is Kashi?' then many people may give many opinions. Some may say Tamil Nadu and some may say Karnataka or any other state ( am paraphrasing).
They can all be heard as opinions but in the end you should have the knowledge and wisdom to conclude that Kashi is in Uttarpradesh. You can't leave it open ended to say all opinions voiced prior are true and equally true.
It is a fair point.
Sarva Darshana Samgraham is a good example. It gives room for many views but ultimately navigates towards a certain darshanic truth. That is how a certain Sampradaya may see it.
Problem with our times today is people like the diversity of this old school Hinduism. But they don't like the conclusive portions. They want everything to be seen as equally equal.
Charvaka should be treated same as Advaita because both are Darshanas afterall. That is not how tradition sees it. Just because you got a seat at the table doesn't mean that your opinion is as valid and true and sound as the other person's.
But the liberal Hindu narrative is not so. They don't like any conclusions. They like the questioning baked into Hinduism. See how Arjuna questioned Krishna they say.
Then they proceed to celebrate the fact that you can question authority in Hinduism. There are many other such examples.
Happily ignoring all the answers given by Krishna to Arjuna and restricting Hinduism to tropes like 'speaking truth to power', 'even god can be questioned in Hinduism', 'free individual's free questioning spirit is what Hinduism is' so on. I find these very dishonest.
It is also this school that usually simps for a distorted, isolated and selective reading of Nasadiya Sukta. Not like they all are scholars or something. They just want some excuse to celebrate 'Muh Hinduism Muh Wish - I am God -God is Great- We are not like those two evil religions Atheists are also Hindus only- You are free to do what you want we are open source' style Hinduism.