@uniquehappy16@PIBinUPSC He was referring to UPSC's likely statement in 2027 prelims " Ghepan lake is in Sikkim." Those haven't read about it will either skip the question or take it as true.
@Kingshuk1314@Samyana_ Not of the opinion that CSAT should be removed , I am from a "humanities" background and successfully attempted more math and reasoning questions than comprehension, but CSAT MATHS should be based on a given syllabus .
@_krish103@ipranavgupta12@sahajtloi Read last sentence of question 'X' was not ready to accept y's opinion means he says law include orders,rules etc. not include customs. We can't have a option that he is partly correct; either he is correct or wrong.
@ipranavgupta12@sahajtloi X is indirectly saying Law includes orders, rules, ordinances, and regulations "only," even though it is not explicitly stated we can find it. so X is wrong.
@Shashwatsrijan5@AvinashiKothari Maybe arts background without any interest in Maths but still 66 was reachable. comprehension coding, logical reasoning ..etc along with some small maths . Myself with BA in P.S . scored 80-90 approx.
@gaurav_writes Go to options- b&c eliminated, now left with 2 options just check 2 st point . Easily option B is answer. Issue with paper was factual Qs like corps 33 srinagar, nationality of nobel prize winner,un peace keeping missions etc.
@gaurav_writes Elimination is still possible here- Even without any in-depth knowledge. just read 3 statements then read 3 points, 3rd point is easy elimination. (1/2)