vinn

jeong supremacist ?!!

[vinn @abtjeong]

YOO JEONGYEON

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem bro I’ve tried to dumb it down for you as much as I can but this is just a user error at this point.

men can ejaculate without needing to be aroused by a woman. that sperm can then get taken and put into a women. therefore a gay person just procreated.

boom not disabled

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem never said anything related to vision impaired people. all I said was gay people can physically procreate therefore they aren’t disabled by the tweets standards. that’s all i’m arguing.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem goal post was never moved. the tweet below said gay people cant procreate, but they can.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem gay people able to procreate? not disabled. thats it. there was nothing said about gay people being disabled because some may need assistance to procreate. it was just a generalized “gay people cant do this” but they can. and that’s all.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem theres no arguing here the entire point was gay people cant procreate at all therefore = disabled but that’s literally factually scientifically untrue. that’s it. that’s the bottom line. that’s literally the entire point.

once you debunk the statement nothing else factors in.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem I swear the other point I just made was about how there are ways to procreate without needing to actually fuck the opposite sex. keep missing the entire point.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem the entire point of conversation is that gay people are technically disabled because they are physically unable to procreate but that statement is just factually untrue

a gay man can get a women pregnant and still be gay

a gay women can get pregnant and still be gay

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Nezd_ @Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem theres ways women can get pregnant without needing to actually have intercourse with a man

[vinn @abtjeong]

@Anon369619439 @TommyIsHere1R3 @SSazCharLimit @Prissyamor @ubelfem being gay doesn’t stop the body from being able to procreate. theres a difference between being physically unable to procreate and just not procreating.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@bcjojo77 @GeektorTv @ievepsyche @jaysimarya @lpopchartmaster “this one news headline called them a jpop group so it has to be true” can we be serious

[vinn @abtjeong]

@bcjojo77 @GeektorTv @ievepsyche @jaysimarya @lpopchartmaster so your just ignorant on purpose

[vinn @abtjeong]

@bcjojo77 @GeektorTv @ievepsyche @jaysimarya @lpopchartmaster I don’t understand why you can’t comprehend any of this

[vinn @abtjeong]

@bcjojo77 @GeektorTv @ievepsyche @jaysimarya @lpopchartmaster making things up is crazy 😭 twice is also signed under warner music japan, releases jpop music, promotes and performs in japan, and is also under JYP Entertainment (which again a south korean company). Yet even with all of that being true, is not a jpop group.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@bcjojo77 @GeektorTv @ievepsyche @jaysimarya @lpopchartmaster you using the fact that misamo makes jpop music as the sole indicator to be considered a jpop group is just ignorant. it holds no weight as any kpop group releasing a japanese track would also be considered a jpop group by your standards. it’s just factually wrong.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@bcjojo77 @GeektorTv @ievepsyche @jaysimarya @lpopchartmaster they are not a jpop group- hell they arent even a group. misamo is a sub unit of twice and they are still under jyp entertainment (which is definitely not a japanese label)

[vinn @abtjeong]

@kiiiwiiiz @kay_totoro mind u this app is rated 16+ lol

[vinn @abtjeong]

@kiiiwiiiz @kay_totoro same thing

[vinn @abtjeong]

@deltaozzimo The school followed the law and sent a permission slip offering you to opt your child out, exactly as required. That is how consent works in this context. If you missed it because it was “buried” in with other slips, that’s not a conspiracy, that’s just not reading the form.

[vinn @abtjeong]

@nanaxmomo9 @mnhpudding @haewonssbae you are correct shawty I apologize for my confusion