My 1st year in the UK I caught wind of the grooming gangs scandal. It sounded horrifying so I looked into it & quickly realised how big this thing was. Clearly a dark stain in the history of the UK.
Really weird seeing Brit influencers' posts now "Wow I had no idea it was so bad"
There is so much more footage. Prosecutors showed twenty minutes of crystal-clear campus video catching Tyler Robinson’s face clearly on the stairs.
It is evil watching bad-faith actors lie to their audience about what actually happened inside that courtroom during the hearing. I was THERE.
@FuentesUpdates I saw that kinda thing in Florida about 15 years ago. Orlando, Cocoa Beach (of all places) etc. Restaurant staff exasperated because we were taking a few minutes to decide whatever
@disclosetv Invasions in 2026 are masked by not using guns and militaries but swarms of migrants. 50k people don’t all decide to go at the same time. There’s an orchestrator to this, and it keeps happening.
@CatholicUSA1776@FuentesUpdates He’s not lying about Tucker’s background. I just find the wilful ignorance about what ppl are discovering re. the CK case bizarre. His criticism could be more nuanced, but it’s not - it’s very black and white. “Candace Owens needs to be wholly discredited” It’s weird
Even criminal attorney Mark Geragos can't believe grainy video is being used as "evidence" TR is guilty. @nickjfuentes acts uninformed on what Candace has discovered &finds official 'evidence' believable🤦♀️Ur coming across as a bad faith actor at this point
https://t.co/F7fVHwaFM1
🇺🇸 A veteran defense attorney just watched the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. And says the prosecution may have blown up its own narrative.
Mark Geragos is calling it not a conspiracy theory, but bad lawyering.
His core point: this was a hearsay-heavy preliminary hearing that ran a full week, when 999 out of 1,000 prelims wrap in a few hours.
When a prosecutor stretches a hearing that long and lets in evidence that can't be cross-examined (like a recorded statement instead of live testimony) Geragos says it invites exactly the scrutiny it was trying to avoid.
Two details stood out to him specifically.
DNA on the rifle reportedly tied to several different individuals. And ring camera footage, testified to by the lead detective himself, allegedly showing the suspect's car with additional unidentified people inside.
Geragos's point isn't that this proves anything. It's that evidence admitted this loosely is, by definition, open to more than one reasonable interpretation, which is the textbook standard for reasonable doubt.
He draws a direct line to how these high-profile cases tend to unfold. Prosecutors show grainy footage and narrate a conclusion the footage doesn't actually support, expecting jurors to fill the gap.
When the defense gets real cross-examination, which he says happened just this week in an unrelated high-profile case, the tidy version often falls apart fast.
Geragos is careful to separate two different questions: motive isn't an element of the crime, and neither is having an accomplice.
But he says the pattern across major cases, Robinson, Luigi Mangione, Bryan Kohberger's now-contested guilty plea, keeps rhyming: multiple people involved is historically the more common outcome than the lone-actor narrative, even when officials present it as settled.
If the preliminary hearing already created this much doubt, what happens once a jury pool gets asked to unanimously believe there's no reasonable doubt left?
@markgeragos
@RealCandaceO Can someone please post the timestamp for the bit that "Might even free a young man who is being wrongly framed for the murder of Charlie Kirk."? Thank you.
@RealCandaceO@AndrewKolvet Why is no one talking anymore about Tyler Robinson's payment receipt at that restaurant 3 hours away from where he was supposed to be according to the official story?
Trump folded himself into a pretzel for Israel, ruined his reputation for Israel, messed up America for Israel and they still hate him for saying he’s saving Israel because it suggests they couldn’t do it without him.
They expect 100% subservience & have zero loyalty in return.
@ShadowofEzra That’s because the democrats are the only ones willing to go after Trump. Who cares if they’re not doing it because he lied to his base, they’re doing it and that’s all that matters. We play to win