WHAT A MESS! Where else can we find a Senate President who boycotts the regular sessions of a chamber which he is supposed to preside, then delivers speeches on Facebook instead of the Senate floor before his peers so we can interpellate him?
Senators were seen crying yesterday as a colleague was being arrested for plunder.
This is in no way an indictment of the accused senator but I would like to remind our lawmakersโฆ
Iyakan nโyo ang ninanakawang Pilipino.
Iyakan nโyo ang binabaha dahil sa nakawan sa flood control.
Iyakan nโyo ang gutom nating mga kababayan.
Get out of your bubble. Please.
mga pinoy, grabe naman iyong three plunder cases and still weโre electing him????
kailan tayo matututo????????????
ayaw niyo ng mahabang pila sa MRT, ayaw niyo ng mataas na tax pero ganitong tao binoboto natin?????
In a condescending tone, a colleague, who is a lawyer took issue with Sen Hontiverosโ lack of โlegal backgroundโ. I have a simple message โ itโs the RULES stupid!
Senator @risahontiveros may not be a lawyer, but she understands her mandate and respects the rules of the Senate.
Meanwhile, some with legal backgrounds use their knowledge not to uphold the rules but to twist policies for political convenience.
You do not need a law degree to understand integrity, accountability, and respect for institutions. โ๐ป
JOINT STATEMENT ON THE SENATE MINORITY WALKOUT
We strongly condemn what appears to be an attempt to rush a major change in the Senate Rules, especially when several members of the minority still wanted to speak and raise serious questions on the floor.
Bakit kailangang madaliin? Bakit kailangang pigilan ang mga gustong magsalita? Bakit kailangang i-divide ang house kung marami pang senador ang nagtatanong tungkol sa proseso?
Minamadali ba ang rule change na ito dahil gusto nilang maka boto si Senator Bato? At ngayong may mga ulat na may mga majority senators na maaaring arestuhin?
We walked out because what happened on the floor looked less like orderly deliberation. The proposed rule change affects how senators may attend sessions, participate in proceedings and exercise their mandate through remote means, and such a measure should be opened to healthy public debate instead of being rushed by the tyranny of the majority.
We have always welcomed healthy discussions on the floor, but this should mean allowing all members to be heard, not forcing the chamber to move at the speed preferred by the majority.
At the time the motion was taken up, there was no duly constituted Committee on Rules and there was not even an elected Majority Leader who could properly guide a rules amendment through the regular process.
How could there have been any action or discussion before the Committee on Rules when no Committee on Rules has been organized to date?
With due respect, the answer that no Senate rule had been violated does not settle the matter, because the rules cannot be treated as a matter of convenience when the very process for amending them is under serious question.
The timing raises a question that the public deserves to hear debated openly. Kaya pinili naming tumayo at iwan ang majority sa plenary. Kaya kami nagdesisyon to question the quorum and call for adjournment.
If the proposal is truly defensible, then let it pass through the proper route.
We owe it to the people who voted for us to do our mandate. This is why we want more time to discuss this further.
Risa Hontiveros: Hindi ako sensitibo sa puna, sanay ako diyan. Pero ang pinakita po na video ay FAKE NEWS. Delivering a privilege speech is not the same as having the privilege to have fake news enter in the official records as if it were evidence.
@risahontiveros ๐๐ผ
๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ก๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ก๐ข ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ง๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ.
The sowing of intrigues has no place in this plenary hall. Fake news has no place in this plenary hall.
๐ช๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ธ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐๐๐ต ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ.