So we lost to them the following season under a new manager means our win the previous season hold no weight?
Cucks like you are the reason other teams can run this narrative.
Like what’s the point in holding that final in high regard just to get SMOKED 6 months later.
What makes it worse is that we went toe to toe with them for 80 mins at their ground just for our keeper to put the ball in our net 3 times. Still gets my head hot thinking about it
I think the reason I had so much hate for Rosenior was because of that tie. It completely ruined the CWC for me, I’d be lying if I said this isn’t completely valid
Like essentially what we��re suggesting is that players like JP and Ekitike would win it OVER the likes of R9 and Henry. As good as they are now, there are levels to this
Idk if I agree with this. I would concede that the average player has gotten better athletically but I think when we’re talking about players who are borderline elite winning balon dors in the previous eras, I think it’s a bit far fetched.
I think the only players capable of winning balon dors back then are the ones that are capable of it today and vice versa. Of course there can be exceptions but my point is I think players at the very pinnacle of the game can transcend eras with relative ease
Maybe it’s naive of me but majority of the dumb tweets I see I refuse to believe there’s people among us that genuinely think like that. It’s easier for me to assume that there’s another reason behind it rather than people genuinely holding that opinion.
For 90% of the controversial tweets on this app, I have the mindset that the person behind it is either a) rage baiting or b) being disingenuous to what they actually believe for whatever reason. I very rarely believe people are being serious and this applies to a lot of topics