@amoginfinity@MarioNawfal Peru's left wing coalition is *very* left wing, including members of a former communist guerrilla (defeated by Keiko's father in the 1990s). In Peru, ethnic/racial grievances are one of the a rallying cries of the left
Today, Bill Gates admitted that pushing climate doomerism was a mistake.
@LLBiggers: “That shift to common sense is welcome, but it comes after decades of fearmongering that harmed young people, stalled development, and punished dissenting scientists.”
The following is an actual question from a University of Arizona chemistry midterm, along with a real student’s answer.
The student’s response was so “profound” that the professor shared it with colleagues via the Internet, which is why we now have the absolute pleasure of enjoying it as well:
Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most students provided proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or a similar principle.
However, one student wrote the following:
First, we need to determine how the mass of Hell changes over time. This requires knowing the rate at which souls enter Hell and the rate at which they leave, which is unlikely. I think we can safely assume that once a soul arrives in Hell, it does not leave.
Therefore, no souls are departing. As for the influx of souls, let’s consider the world’s religions today.
Most religions claim that if you are not a member, you will go to Hell. Since there are multiple religions and people typically belong to only one, we can project that all souls end up in Hell. With current birth and death rates, the number of souls in Hell should increase exponentially.
Now, applying Boyle’s Law, which states that for temperature and pressure in Hell to remain constant, its volume must expand proportionally as souls are added.
This leads to two possibilities:
1. If Hell expands more slowly than the rate at which souls enter, the temperature and pressure will rise until all Hell breaks loose.
2. If Hell expands faster than the influx of souls, the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So, which is it?
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my freshman year—“It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you”—and consider that I slept with her last night, then option two must be true.
Thus, I am certain that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary is that since Hell has frozen over, it no longer accepts souls and is therefore extinct, leaving only Heaven. This proves the existence of a divine being, which explains why Teresa kept shouting “Oh my God” last night.
This student received an A+.
@WRGuinn @JohnMcNichols1 Non-restrained deportees did hijack a return flight (to Haiti, on Biden’s watch), that’s why the Biden Admin started using these restraining methods. Look it up.
@WRGuinn @JohnMcNichols1 Non-restrained deportees did hijack a return flight (to Haiti, on Biden’s watch), that’s why the Biden Admin started using these restraining methods. Look it up.
Most governments don’t want USAID funds flowing into their countries because they understand where much of that money actually ends up.
While marketed as support for development, democracy, and human rights, the majority of these funds are funneled into opposition groups, NGOs with political agendas, and destabilizing movements.
At best, maybe 10% of the money reaches real projects that help people in need (there are such cases), but the rest is used to fuel dissent, finance protests, and undermine administrations that refuse to align with the globalist agenda.
Cutting this so-called aid isn’t just beneficial for the United States; it’s also a big win for the rest of the world.