> critiques bourgeoisification of Marxism and espouses an anti-liberal & proudly sectarian mindset
> buys wholesale into linear historical progress teleology with fact-value distinction to boot as long as you add "Communism" at the end
I agree that the traditional supply and demand equilibrating story within a Marshallian partial-equilibrium story is not right, but Sraffa didnโt believe supply and demand were fake. His 1926 paper mostly just contends that supply should be seen as horizontal.
The BE and FD convo is a perfect example of that terminally online leftist shit being alienating asf, just insanely socially maladjusted and feeling like you can talk to people any way
Communizers are at least asking the right questions about the communist movement, even if I disagree with them on basically everything, I can respect them not being immersed in debates about great men from the 1920s.