This is an impact-triggered avalanche on Mars๐
It's important to preface ๐ฒwhat I'm about to share๐ฒ by firstly sharing what an impact-triggered avalanche looks like.
The materials are activated by impacts and fall downhill, as if they were liquid.
1/
https://t.co/RyK1zTlZqg
The coverup and delay of justice seen in the billions of dollars of fraud is by design. They're giving the fraudsters the time and opportunity to buy their way out.
You don't indict them then let them go back home and keep sending them $50,000,000 unless you're fleecing them.
All the ridiculous errors in the "life on Mars" announcement should tip you off that they have no clue what they're talking about.
That was laughable though.
They needed a paper which said there's life or they weren't doing a return mission. Heat can produce the same results.
It's funny how the proposed bulge went down RIGHT when the water level rose in the great lakes. That darn bulge, impeccable timing!
What really happened is their prediction failed and the jig was up, so they decided it was time for their bulge to subside. It's a joke.
https://t.co/2sRiFEfeQm
This is the kind of paper that is produced to cover up the fact the previous work was utter nonsense.
They are wrong about their idea, and just listen to this mental gymnastics:
What I learned is that my idea will eventually succeed. It's true and the best defender of the established ideas did not have a compelling objection to it. This doesn't mean it will be accepted in my lifetime, but it gives me hope.
For the past year I've been discussing my new geo idea with a relevant scientist. He had objections, but could not object to any of my rebuttals. He, essentially, conceded every point up until one single angle of evidence that we don't know or understand. He blocked me.
I'm glad I took the time to build my case. I had an answer for every objection. Dave knew there was no avenue to write me off or mount a strong defense to my rebuttals. He waited all the way till he thought I had a weak answer. My answer isn't necessarily weak, just unsatisfying.
He said he is sorry if I'm right, but he can no longer discuss it.
This is Dave Petley, of course. The vice-principle of Sheffield university.
He was my opportunity to reach academics and warn them of our ignorance of a very large geohazard (landslide) risk. I failed.
My next option is to appeal to other scientists and the public. So, I will be sharing my research in the coming days. It's shocking research that suggests we do not live on a tectonic planet, but something different, and potentially much more interesting and hazardous.
I applaud @skdh for the incredible courage and scientific thinking that went into this decision and video. I'm shocked, but somehow not. This had to happen. It was inevitable. You love science or you simply want to work within the business of science.
This Sabine Hossenfelder video is the most important video on modern science.
Science isn't science anymore. It's business, and there is very little room for the truth in business.
https://t.co/HeTlsG4LqH