I like @a1lon9 and use @Pumpfun a lot, but on the stats I disagree. Median is the better indicator of callout quality than the mean. Market caps and gains are heavily right-skewed, so a few runners pull the average up while the typical call sits much lower. Most people never know the top in real time, so the majority of followers are not actually realizing those average gains. Rewarding accounts on that basis anyway creates a motive to farm callouts rather than put out substance.
PUMPFUN IS REWARDING SCAMMERS!
...is what I would say if it were true
Given the amount of takes surrounding a completely manipulated Callout Rewards table over the past day, I thought it's best if we give you data straight from the source.
Below is a table which ranks the biggest earners alongside the exact same filters used in the table from that post - with one VERY important caveat:
We INTENTIONALLY removed any callouts over 500m for illustrative purposes, which completely skews the average MC of all these users' last 100 callouts to the downside (sorry)
Additionally, for the sake of the KOLs that I am exposing, I added a column for their average callout, since the previous author intentionally used median to hurt the optics of their callouts.
I expect there to be some cherrypicking with some of the people on this list, but the fact remains: for as many 'bad traders' we reward, there are countless GREAT traders who deserve every penny they receive in rewards
Building the most lucrative creator payouts program was never going to be an easy feat, and one of our main objectives continues to be rewarding ethical traders who are safe for users on our app, but we will get there eventually.
If you are a good trader, you're entitled to a huge share of these rewards. Join Pumpfun now to be automatically enrolled in Callout Rewards.
That puts profitability at roughly $170 per deployment on average. Assuming 11 minutes per launch-and-sell cycle, that works out to approximately $927 in reported PNL per hour.
The numbers are impressive, but they also highlight how much volume and automation are required to achieve them.
People underestimate the work behind these numbers. Across 25 wallets, the average is 30K+ token deployments and $5.1M in reported PNL. But the graduation rate is low, meaning only a small fraction of those deployments likely reached meaningful milestones. Assuming 11 minutes per launch and sell cycle, thatโs 15.3 hours a day, 365 days a year, to achieve in one year. Even with automation, the scale is insane.
Hey Steve, we love what youโre doing with giving back and gambling, but the problem is itโs starting to get repetitive. You need a refresh.
What people are craving nowadays is genuineness and passion. We want to see what youโre actually interested in and get a deeper look into your hobbies and passions.
For example, something like giving 100 dogs a home, or you going up against a pro pickleball player. Then sprinkle in the gambling and giving back throughout. I think that would make the content feel a lot more genuine, fresh, and entertaining.
@a1lon9 I just applied. Even though I am truly over qualified for this role I canโt help but be a true degen at heart. If graced with the position I will 100x this space with haste. @RainsRevenge
@metaversejoji I like to go jump rope when i feel tired or lack the motivation. Maybe try pushups and dead hangs for your back for 5 mins every hour to stay locked.
In November 1998, Wei Dai posted a short proposal to the cypherpunks mailing list. ๐
He called it b-money: a way for untraceable peers to have money and contracts without a state in the middle. Money would be created by burning compute. Accounts would be public keys. The ledger would be collective.
He did not ship a chain. The file just sat there: https://t.co/eqzdf47XBp. ๐
Ten years later, Satoshi published the Bitcoin whitepaper. Reference [1] is b-money. Adam Back had pointed Satoshi to Wei Dai. Satoshi emailed him for the citation.
Early Bitcoin even used Daiโs Crypto++ library for SHA-256.
That is the lore. It is real. It is also not a business plan. ๐ฏ
Nowadays $b-money was launched on bsc chain via @flapdotsh ๐ฆ
The hook is simple. Holders receive BTCB from a 1/1 tax. No staking page. No weekly claim. Trade happens, tax happens, Bitcoin-on-BNB hits wallets. The name points at the whitepaper. The mechanism points at BTC.
Website: https://t.co/LbE8csV5Qk
If you hold, you are not only sitting on a ticker. You are getting a drip of the asset the lore is about.
In a market addicted to points, dashboards, and airdrop theater, โdo nothing, receive BTCBโ is easy to repeat. ๐
Distribution so far has been on-chain and retail-shaped: Flap launch, Binance Wallet by contract, FOMO verification, LBank.
Ca: 0xf49725118cb0707b8706ffffe895f3ab16da7777
Potential, in this case, is not cash flow or a roadmap. It is whether the name keeps finding new eyes. ๐
Three things have to stay true at the same time:
1 - The 1998 story remains the frame.
2 - The BTCB mechanism keeps paying and stays simple enough to explain.
3 - The token does not get confused with an endorsement. Wei Dai has already noted the irony.
b-money is one of the cleanest origin objects in crypto. ๐ฃ๏ธ
@bmoneyonbnb
If OG's always win, how cool would the narrative be for @pumpfun to do something for the real original coins that don't have creator fees to redirect?
How about make those first tokens pairable to participate in this new meta? That would be game changing for the ecosystem! @a1lon9@json1444@sapijiju@rainsrevenge@initwithcarl