Adelaide Chiundra

I support Women whether they are right or wrong.

[Adelaide Chiundra @addiefresh1]

ED is my President!

#Vision2030

[Prof Jonathan Moyo @ProfJNMoyo]

@zimlive How on earth is an official government statement in Parliament (a second reading speech) introducing an amendment to the Constitution an OPINION? This is not right. There are times when communicators owe society rationalty and proportionality!

[Nkululeko Maseko @NkululekoM0124]

What the Opposition won in #CA3 public consultations

The opposition’s grand victory in recently concluded public consultations were only Email submissions. Just 2,232 of them — a microscopic 0.4% of the total consultation record.

For months, opposition activists, NGOs and social media commentators tried to create the impression that Zimbabwe was united against CAB3. The numbers have now exposed that narrative for what it was: an online echo chamber mistaken for national opinion.

A total of 540,037 submissions were received. Of those, 99.46% supported the Bill. Not 60%. Not 70%. Not even 90%. An overwhelming 99.46%.

The opposition’s loudest supporters dominated timelines, hashtags and comment sections, but when Parliament opened formal channels for citizens to participate, they simply did not show up in meaningful numbers. The digital noise collapsed the moment it encountered real public engagement.

No serious observer can honestly argue that half a million submissions represent a silent process. Citizens were given the opportunity to speak and they did. The record is now permanent.

Of course, this does not mean every Zimbabwean supports CAB3. No democratic process can ever produce unanimity. What it does prove is that among those who participated through Parliament’s constitutional mechanisms, support for the Bill was overwhelming while opposition mobilisation was spectacularly ineffective.

The real lesson is uncomfortable for CAB3 critics: social media outrage is not public opinion, activist press statements are not national consensus, and hashtag campaigns are not constitutional participation.

Parliament now proceeds with a documented mandate backed by hundreds of thousands of submissions. The opposition may continue shouting online, but the constitutional record shows who turned up, who participated, and whose voice carried weight.

In the end, Zimbabwe’s constitutional future was not decided by the loudest voices on X. It was shaped by the hundreds of thousands of citizens who engaged with the process while the opposition mistook tweeting for participation.

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

The reality is that Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 has already crossed its most important political hurdle: public consultations. The Parliamentary Portfolio Committee report tabled this week recorded 537,102 supportive submissions out of 540,037 received, representing a reported 99.4% support rate.

#CA3 has gone through the constitutionally required 90-day public consultation process and is now firmly in Parliament’s hands.

At this stage, opposition activists continue to behave as if social media outrage can overturn parliamentary arithmetic. It cannot. The decisive battlefield is Parliament, and everyone knows the governing party and its allies possess the numbers needed to drive the process forward.

Instead of selling false hope, opposition figures should start preparing their supporters for the political reality that is emerging. If CA3 passes the National Assembly as expected and proceeds through the remaining constitutional stages, Zimbabwe’s political landscape will fundamentally change. Serious politicians adapt to political realities; they do not survive by denying them.

The more responsible approach would be to educate supporters on how to operate, compete and prosper under the amended constitutional framework rather than pretending the process can still be stopped by press conferences, petitions or nostalgic appeals to personalities.

History is unforgiving to politicians who mistake wishful thinking for strategy. The debate is rapidly moving from whether CA3 will pass to how political actors will position themselves once it does.

Those who understand that reality will remain relevant. Those who continue selling fantasies to their followers risk becoming spectators in a constitutional future they failed to prepare for.

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

Why the Opposition Approach Must Shift From Resistance to Adaptation of Constitution Amendment Bill 3

Zimbabwe’s constitutional debate appears to be entering its final phase, and the political implications are becoming increasingly difficult to ignore.

Following the parliamentary debates this week and the tabling of the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee report on Constitutional Amendment No. 3 (CA3), the centre of gravity in the national conversation has shifted decisively. The report indicated that 537,102 out of 540,037 submissions received during public consultations supported the Bill, translating to a reported approval rate of 99.4%.

Whether one agrees with the proposed amendments or not, the political reality emerging from Parliament is that CA3 now possesses significant institutional momentum. The Bill has passed through the consultation phase, has been subjected to parliamentary scrutiny, and now awaits voting in the National Assembly. Given the current composition of Parliament and the numerical realities within the legislature, many observers view its passage as increasingly likely.

In constitutional politics, momentum matters. Once a proposal has successfully navigated public consultations, committee scrutiny and parliamentary debate, the focus often shifts from contesting its existence to understanding its likely impact. Constitutional development across the world has frequently followed this pattern, where political actors eventually transition from resistance to adaptation as institutional realities become clearer.

This is where a critical strategic question emerges for opposition figures such as Muchena, the retired generals, Freeman Chari, Tendai Biti and Nelson Chamisa.

What is the endgame?

https://t.co/84r1QPQoVb

[Prof Jonathan Moyo @ProfJNMoyo]

'Indirect Executive Election Systems'
By Kelvin Jakachira; https://t.co/eU4CgbtnJd

"In the current debate over Zimbabwe's Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No. 3 Bill (CA3), opponents have deployed a headline count: a large majority of countries in the world directly elect their president, while only a minority do so indirectly.

The numerical framing is intended to suggest that direct election is the democratic mainstream and that CA3's proposed return to indirect parliamentary election of the president is a retreat from it.

The previous phase of this research established that the 108 direct-election states, when disaggregated by region and regime history, are composed overwhelmingly of former military regimes, former one-party states, former socialist states, and current authoritarian systems.

That finding, which revealed that the majority was built by dictatorships rather than democracies, reversed the opposition's framing of the count.

This brief completes the reversal by examining the other side: the 53 indirect-election states. When the 53 are profiled by population, economic output, democratic quality, stability, and institutional character, the picture that emerges is the opposite of what the opposition implies. The 53 are not a rump of undemocratic laggards.

They are, in aggregate, the most populous, the most economically significant, the most democratically stable, and the most institutionally coherent group of states in the world.

They represent fewer governments but more people, less land but more wealth, and, stripped of their authoritarian outliers, a substantially higher standard of democratic quality than the 108".

Link to full article:
https://t.co/nCpPt0UtEI

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

Ana Matete ndovanhu vakafoira kuchikoro vachi coper zvese ne zita. He took Madhuku's noted but failed to change the name. He thinks people will believe this whole choreographed nonsense. NO ONE in Zanu Pf has time to do this stupid thing. Everyone in the party knows #CA3 will pass, with or without all these premature court cases that will DEFINITELY get thrown out of the courts. We don't fear that, the real issue left with #CA3 is the voting process that we very much have under control as all our 2/3s majority in Parliament have pledged to support. After tonight's Parly debates I thought you people would understand that hapasisina anything to stop #CA3. Instead of wasting your time, why not try to forge a way forward for yourselves to see how you can survive politically with #CA3 in place.
@MateteYoung

[Prof Jonathan Moyo @ProfJNMoyo]

WHEN NUMBERS HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO TELL IT LIKE IT IS: No rocket science is required to explain why roughly 99 percent of the physical written submissions to Parliament on the Constitution (Amendment No. 3) H.B. 1 Bill, 2026, overwhelmingly backed the Bill. It is plain common sense: Zanu PF simply did what any serious political organisation does; it mobilised its physical grassroots structures, and those structures responded in massive, disciplined numbers.

By sharp contrast, Nelson Chamisa—the very politician opposition media have spent years branding as Zimbabwe’s most popular leader—chose not to mobilise his supporters at all. Instead, he actively dissuaded and demobilised them by declaring that Zimbabwe had “no constitution to talk about.” His elitist allies, meanwhile, relied on precisely the wrong tools: viral posts from big social-media accounts of celebrated influencers that racked up hundreds of thousands of views but never translated into a single physical written submission; outdated technology of emails; headline-chasing press conferences; and divisive pastoral letters.

All of these generated noise, but zero ground presence at Parliament.

So, those who are now pretending shock or clumsily alleging that the figures were “cooked”; should answer an unavoidable and simple question: exactly where did they imagine the mountain of opposing physical written submissions was supposed to come from? Social-media impressions do not walk into Parliament. Old-fashioned emails do not queue at the clerks’ offices. Hashtags do not sign written forms.

Politics is not a popularity contest judged by headlines, social media views or retweets; it is a contest of structures and ground organisation. Zanu PF has plentiful of those structures and used them with clinical effectiveness; as the numbers now prove beyond rational dispute. Everything else is mere psychodrama. Numbers, after all, do not lie!

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

My "learned" brother @freemanchari and his @cdfzim team didn't know that when you send emails via a bot they either bounce back or automatically get sent to SPAM folder.

Emails sent via bots often land in the spam folder because automated scripts frequently lack proper authentication records like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC which email providers use to verify the sender's identity.

All those emails they sent never got through. He should have known that. He is to blame for the stats not Parliament. Parliament simply recorded what they received and nothing else. #CA3 is UNSTOPPABLE!!!!!

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

If they say Parliament submissions were rigged ask them to send screenshots or pictures of their submissions - not through that fraudulent mandlalite bot - but actual emails and letters sent. NONE of them sent anything, kuswera vachiita noise online ivo vasingaite anything. Biti even asked people to boycott public consultation meetings where they could have been given a chance to submit physically.

Blame yourselves nekusarongeka. Nero even told you kuti you can never do anything without him. Go back to him and ask for forgiveness 😂😂😂😂😂

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

Hanzi ana @Chofamba naana @zimbabweyauya vaingoita noise chete online vasiri kutumira ma emails 😭😭😭😭💔

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

My brother @freemanchari, never lose hope in your systems. I know Mandla failed and reported kuti kuKariba Dam kunogara vanhu 3 million, and this @cdfzim Bot thing also failed and sent emails to a wrong address. Zvima computer zvinombobhaiza sometimes. Tough luck

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

Lord Mafreezo after discovering his Bots were sending emails to a wrong email address 😭😭😭

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

Parliament is in fire today 🔥😂. Even opposition MPs see it that #CA3 is a unifying force. Now imagine when it has passed. Tichafa nekunakirwa

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

In the history of all Presidents, have you ever seen such a president who can sit at table with those against him to hear them out and talk to them?

President ED continues to demonstrate why he is a leader of rare political maturity and statesmanship. Today, he welcomed the Zimbabwe Heads of Christian Denominations to State House, listening attentively to their views and petitions, despite some of the constituent bodies having reservations about #CA3.

A true people’s leader does not surround himself with praise singers alone. He sits at the same table with those who disagree with him, hears them out, and engages respectfully in the national interest. As long as views are presented with civility and respect, President Mnangagwa’s door remains open.

This is the mark of a listening President, a unifier, and the genuine voice of the people. While others thrive on confrontation and insults, President ED continues to build consensus, proving that leadership is about dialogue, not division. #CA3

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

@wicknellchivayo Zvaendwa izvi mukuru, they should be talking about how they can adjust to what #CA3 says and preparing themselves for the future not going against it. Zvaendwa izviii, its no longer a bill, its a reality now thats why takuti ya #CA3!!!!

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

@TembaMliswa They are also premature, how can you sue someone who hasn't even vote for/against the bill?

[Glen Sungano Mpani @glenmpani]

Why Zimbabwe's presidential debate centres on political stability, not democracy https://t.co/sXgVTE0iw5

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

Please read these court applications and laugh with me😂🙌🏿. Izvi hazvina kusiyana nekuti you sue an MP for winning an election because iwewe wega you never voted for him. Makakwana here imi🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Marcia Chiga @MarciaChiga]

The member speaks passionately about having "the people in their hearts," but let’s look at the actual reality of what opposing Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (CA3) means. Standing against #CA3 isn't defending democracy it is actively blocking the progress, stability,

[Shumbakadzi👑 @shumbakadzi_zim]

Have you noticed that its just 5 MPs who are saying they will vote against #CA3? 205 yasara iyi varikuti YES! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🙌🏿🙌🏿
@GiftGivaldo
@cmatewu
@shamauswa