In the past two weeks, Cenk Uygur has posted about Israel over 200 times.
He averages more than one post about Israel every hour.
This is actual derangement.
@cenkuygur The level of creativity you have is astounding. As an Israeli, I can’t even imagine coming up with so many ways to talk about Israel day after day.
The obsession and commitment are second only to Tucker.
The current anti-Israel and even anti-Jewish sentiment online is a social contagion, no different than transgenderism or autism before it.
Of course, there is actually a condition known as gender dysphoria. But every family in Hollywood didn't suddenly and coincidentally have at least one child with gender dysphoria at the exact same time by natural processes.
And of course there is actually a condition known as autism. But every family in Manhattan didn't suddenly and coincidentally have at least one child with autism at the exact same time by natural processes.
You aren't an Israel skeptic, and you didn't start "noticing." You were told, and shown by interested parties, and you were rewarded with attention and dopamine by the tellers and showers.
And as with every social contagion, what you have been told and shown is an overwhelming quantity of selectively chosen half-truths -- or full-truths with half-context.
You believe you are a free thinker, but when every "free thinker" arrives at the same conclusion at the exact same time... well, the thinking isn't as free as you believe it is.
@RealCandaceO Every time you falsely claim you have evidence that Israel did something bad you come back the day after with a story about a “dream you had”
“Netanyahu paid Hamas $35 million per month” is another way of saying “Israel allowed Qatar to send aid to Gaza.”
“Israeli soldier testifies that he was given a stand down order on Oct 7th” is a dishonest way of saying “A soldier saw Hamas maneuvering before October 7 and was instructed that it was probably not worth responding to.”
Feel Free to stop being dishonest.
I guess Israel made him say this back then too, right? 🙈
If anyone thinks Bibi made Trump go to war, that person clearly doesn’t know very much about Trump.
But watch what he says in this old interview.
A history lesson for every anti Semite out there.
Many people use the name “Palestine” as if it always referred to an ancient nation or a specific people. The historical story is actually different.
The word “Palestine” was originally a geographic name used by empires to describe a region in the Middle East, not the name of a nation or ethnic group.
After the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 CE, the Roman emperor Hadrian changed the name of the province of Judea to Syria Palaestina. Historians generally agree that the change was intended to weaken the Jewish connection to the land. The name itself was derived from the Philistines, an ancient people who lived mainly along the coastal area around what is today Gaza.
For many centuries after that, under the Byzantine Empire, early Islamic rule, the Ottoman Empire, and later the British, “Palestine” remained mainly a geographic term for the region. There was no independent state called Palestine during those periods.
During the time of the British Mandate in the early twentieth century, the term “Palestinian” was used for anyone living in the territory, including Jews, Christians, and Muslims. For example, Jewish institutions sometimes used the name as well, and passports issued by the British authorities were called Palestine passports.
The modern political use of the term Palestinian people as a distinct national identity developed mainly during the twentieth century.
The history of the Middle East is complex, but understanding how the name “Palestine” was used over time helps explain why the discussion about identity and history in this region is still debated today.
Why happened to Tucker Carlson?
There can only be one or two answers. Either he’s completely brainwashed and lost his way or he’s taking money from the opposition to spew nonsense. Smh
@jakeshieldsajj Jake: if I'm an "unknown Jew," why did you ask me to debate you on two separate occasions on the "truth of 9/11?"
Please explain like I'm just as brain damaged as you.